A Cross-sectional Study of the Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Use of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis

Emile Abimana, E. Ntabanganyimana, R. Ndahimana, Appolinaire Bizimana, E. Umutesi, R. O. Sebatunzi, F. Masaisa
{"title":"A Cross-sectional Study of the Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Use of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis","authors":"Emile Abimana, E. Ntabanganyimana, R. Ndahimana, Appolinaire Bizimana, E. Umutesi, R. O. Sebatunzi, F. Masaisa","doi":"10.28991/scimedj-2022-0401-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and preventable disease among non-surgical hospitalized patients. Its incidence is high and alarming. Acute medical patients have VTE risk during and after hospitalization. The Padua prediction score is a risk model created to identify high VTE risk patients among non-surgical hospitalized patients. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey of 107 patients admitted to Internal Medicine wards who were assessed as acutely ill patients at Emergency Department, in a period of 4 weeks. The demographic and clinical data were collected using a designed questionnaire. VTE risk was defined as having a Padua Prediction score of ≥4 points. A statistical analysis was done to determine prevalence. The patients at high VTE risk received thromboprophylaxis. Results: One hundred and seven eligible patients were included. 84% were found to be at high risk for VTE. Among physiologically unstable patients, 60% of the patients were classified in red color during the time of triage; this means they were severely sick and needed resuscitation. Among the leading diagnosis, severe pneumonia was predominant (29%). Severe pneumonia and uncontrolled DM showed a significant association with high VTE risk. 11.1% of high VTE risk patients were taking anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis prior to the recruitment. Conclusion:This study demonstrated a high prevalence of VTE risk among acute ill medical patients and underuse of anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis in potential patients at Kigali University Teaching Hospital, CHUK. The Padua prediction score should be implemented for early detection of patients at-risk of VTE in severely ill patients and to start anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis on time for reducing mortality and morbidity. Doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2022-0401-5 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":74776,"journal":{"name":"SciMedicine journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SciMedicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/scimedj-2022-0401-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and preventable disease among non-surgical hospitalized patients. Its incidence is high and alarming. Acute medical patients have VTE risk during and after hospitalization. The Padua prediction score is a risk model created to identify high VTE risk patients among non-surgical hospitalized patients. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey of 107 patients admitted to Internal Medicine wards who were assessed as acutely ill patients at Emergency Department, in a period of 4 weeks. The demographic and clinical data were collected using a designed questionnaire. VTE risk was defined as having a Padua Prediction score of ≥4 points. A statistical analysis was done to determine prevalence. The patients at high VTE risk received thromboprophylaxis. Results: One hundred and seven eligible patients were included. 84% were found to be at high risk for VTE. Among physiologically unstable patients, 60% of the patients were classified in red color during the time of triage; this means they were severely sick and needed resuscitation. Among the leading diagnosis, severe pneumonia was predominant (29%). Severe pneumonia and uncontrolled DM showed a significant association with high VTE risk. 11.1% of high VTE risk patients were taking anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis prior to the recruitment. Conclusion:This study demonstrated a high prevalence of VTE risk among acute ill medical patients and underuse of anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis in potential patients at Kigali University Teaching Hospital, CHUK. The Padua prediction score should be implemented for early detection of patients at-risk of VTE in severely ill patients and to start anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis on time for reducing mortality and morbidity. Doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2022-0401-5 Full Text: PDF
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉血栓栓塞风险评估和抗凝血栓预防应用的横断面研究
背景:静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是非手术住院患者中常见且可预防的疾病。它的发病率很高,令人担忧。急性医学患者在住院期间和住院后有VTE风险。Padua预测评分是一个风险模型,用于识别非手术住院患者中VTE高危患者。方法:我们对107名入住内科病房的患者进行了横断面调查,这些患者在4周内被评估为急诊科的急性病患者。使用设计的问卷收集人口统计学和临床数据。VTE风险定义为Padua预测得分≥4分。进行了统计分析以确定患病率。VTE高危患者接受血栓预防。结果:107名符合条件的患者被纳入。84%的患者有VTE的高风险。在生理不稳定的患者中,60%的患者在分诊期间被分类为红色;这意味着他们病情严重,需要复苏。在主要诊断中,严重肺炎占主导地位(29%)。严重肺炎和未控制的糖尿病与VTE高风险显著相关。11.1%的VTE高危患者在招募前进行了抗凝血栓预防。结论:这项研究表明,在基加利大学教学医院,CHUK的急性疾病患者中,VTE风险的发生率很高,而在潜在患者中,抗凝血剂用于血栓预防的使用不足。Padua预测评分应用于早期发现重症患者中有VTE风险的患者,并及时开始抗凝血栓预防,以降低死亡率和发病率。Doi:10.28991/SciMedJ-2022-0401-5全文:PDF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study on Prediction of Survival Event of Heart Failure Patients Using Machine Learning and Statistical Algorithms Systematic Review on the Effects of Food on Mental Health via Gut Microbiome Giant Fungating Borderline Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast Community Preparedness, Acceptability, and Uptake of UTT Services in PHC Facilities Effect of Season on Blood Transfusion Patterns: A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1