Who is cooperative in negotiations? The impact of political skill on cooperation, reputation and outcomes

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION International Journal of Conflict Management Pub Date : 2023-05-17 DOI:10.1108/ijcma-11-2022-0197
K. Tasa, Mehran Bahmani
{"title":"Who is cooperative in negotiations? The impact of political skill on cooperation, reputation and outcomes","authors":"K. Tasa, Mehran Bahmani","doi":"10.1108/ijcma-11-2022-0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to predict cooperation in negotiation through the lens of individual differences. Specifically, this paper examines how a social competence variable called “political skill” relates to cooperation and subsequent effects on negotiation process, outcomes and negotiator reputation. The authors demonstrate how political skill fits in the evolving literature focusing on individual differences in negotiation by comparing political skill to a wide range of other individual difference measures.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study was conducted by assessing individual difference measures at the beginning of graduate-level negotiation courses and tracking negotiation behaviors and outcomes over several months. This approach was chosen to minimize the potential for short, time-limited interactions to mask existing relationships. It also allowed the authors to include multiple negotiation interactions, which takes a broader view of negotiation performance, and assess negotiator reputation by allowing it to emerge over time.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results of this study show that political skill, self-rated at the beginning of this study, is significantly related to a negotiator’s overall use of cooperative behavior as rated by peers. Political skill also showed a significant relationship with reputation for cooperativeness and aggregate outcomes in negotiations. These results control for other individual difference measures such as personality, implicit negotiation beliefs, social value orientation and negotiation self-efficacy.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nUsing a method that allows the effects of an individual difference to materialize over time, this study empirically establishes the connection between political skill and negotiation reputation, process and outcomes. The methodological contributions of this study explore the relations between self-rated individual difference variables, peer-rated cooperative behaviors and objective coded negotiation outcomes in evaluating political skill in negotiation.\n","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-11-2022-0197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to predict cooperation in negotiation through the lens of individual differences. Specifically, this paper examines how a social competence variable called “political skill” relates to cooperation and subsequent effects on negotiation process, outcomes and negotiator reputation. The authors demonstrate how political skill fits in the evolving literature focusing on individual differences in negotiation by comparing political skill to a wide range of other individual difference measures. Design/methodology/approach This study was conducted by assessing individual difference measures at the beginning of graduate-level negotiation courses and tracking negotiation behaviors and outcomes over several months. This approach was chosen to minimize the potential for short, time-limited interactions to mask existing relationships. It also allowed the authors to include multiple negotiation interactions, which takes a broader view of negotiation performance, and assess negotiator reputation by allowing it to emerge over time. Findings The results of this study show that political skill, self-rated at the beginning of this study, is significantly related to a negotiator’s overall use of cooperative behavior as rated by peers. Political skill also showed a significant relationship with reputation for cooperativeness and aggregate outcomes in negotiations. These results control for other individual difference measures such as personality, implicit negotiation beliefs, social value orientation and negotiation self-efficacy. Originality/value Using a method that allows the effects of an individual difference to materialize over time, this study empirically establishes the connection between political skill and negotiation reputation, process and outcomes. The methodological contributions of this study explore the relations between self-rated individual difference variables, peer-rated cooperative behaviors and objective coded negotiation outcomes in evaluating political skill in negotiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁在谈判中是合作的?政治技巧对合作、声誉和结果的影响
目的本研究的目的是通过个体差异的视角来预测谈判中的合作。具体而言,本文考察了一个被称为“政治技能”的社会能力变量与合作的关系,以及对谈判过程、结果和谈判声誉的后续影响。作者通过将政治技能与其他广泛的个人差异衡量标准进行比较,展示了政治技能如何适应不断发展的谈判中的个人差异文献。设计/方法/方法这项研究是通过在研究生级别的谈判课程开始时评估个人差异测量,并在几个月内跟踪谈判行为和结果来进行的。选择这种方法是为了最大限度地减少短期、有时间限制的互动掩盖现有关系的可能性。它还允许作者包括多个谈判互动,从更广泛的角度看待谈判绩效,并通过允许其随着时间的推移而出现来评估谈判人员的声誉。结果本研究的结果表明,在本研究开始时自我评价的政治技能与谈判者对同伴评价的合作行为的整体使用显著相关。政治技能也显示出与合作声誉和谈判总结果的显著关系。这些结果控制了其他个体差异指标,如个性、内隐谈判信念、社会价值取向和谈判自我效能。独创性/价值本研究采用一种允许个体差异的影响随着时间的推移而具体化的方法,实证地建立了政治技巧与谈判声誉之间的联系,过程和结果。本研究的方法学贡献探讨了自评个体差异变量、同伴评价合作行为和客观编码谈判结果在评估谈判政治技能方面的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Conflict management 101: how emotional intelligence can make or break a manager The relationship between management vs nonmanagement status and women employees’ dissent expression in US organizations Social strife at work: unravelling the link between workplace relationship conflict and employee ostracism behavior Does the conflict between work and family hinder thriving? Role of depersonalization and intrinsic motivation Workplace bullying and employee silence: the role of affect-based trust and climate for conflict management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1