"Stuck in this wheel": The use of design thinking for change in educational organizations.

IF 2.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Educational Change Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s10833-022-09462-6
Bryan A VanGronigen, Lauren P Bailes, Michael L Saylor
{"title":"\"Stuck in this wheel\": The use of design thinking for change in educational organizations.","authors":"Bryan A VanGronigen, Lauren P Bailes, Michael L Saylor","doi":"10.1007/s10833-022-09462-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many of today's educational organizations around the world contend with complex challenges. Yet, longstanding practices and norms in educational systems can hamper educators' abilities to identify and address these challenges, such as only principals leading change efforts or the use of misaligned \"quick fixes\" for ill-defined challenges. A design-based approach to organizational change, on the other hand, holds promise to reframe change in local educational agencies like schools. Design thinking is one way to enact a design-based approach, but little research has investigated the process's use to help educators conceptualize and implement change. Drawing upon transformational learning theory, this United States-based mixed-methods study examined a year-long professional learning workshop sponsored by a state education agency that used design thinking to reframe how participants orchestrated change in their contexts. Results indicated that design thinking helped participants devise more nuanced understandings of themselves and the change process in their contexts, yet, most participants' actions continued to be influenced by longstanding practices and norms of the U.S. educational system. We close by discussing implications for practice and policy, particularly the need for professional learning experiences that prompt educators to critically reflect upon their mindsets and how their actions may differ from those mindsets. This greater understanding can better position educators to engage in change efforts that address increasingly complex challenges in education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Change","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9360732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Change","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09462-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many of today's educational organizations around the world contend with complex challenges. Yet, longstanding practices and norms in educational systems can hamper educators' abilities to identify and address these challenges, such as only principals leading change efforts or the use of misaligned "quick fixes" for ill-defined challenges. A design-based approach to organizational change, on the other hand, holds promise to reframe change in local educational agencies like schools. Design thinking is one way to enact a design-based approach, but little research has investigated the process's use to help educators conceptualize and implement change. Drawing upon transformational learning theory, this United States-based mixed-methods study examined a year-long professional learning workshop sponsored by a state education agency that used design thinking to reframe how participants orchestrated change in their contexts. Results indicated that design thinking helped participants devise more nuanced understandings of themselves and the change process in their contexts, yet, most participants' actions continued to be influenced by longstanding practices and norms of the U.S. educational system. We close by discussing implications for practice and policy, particularly the need for professional learning experiences that prompt educators to critically reflect upon their mindsets and how their actions may differ from those mindsets. This greater understanding can better position educators to engage in change efforts that address increasingly complex challenges in education.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“困在这个轮子里”:设计思维在教育组织变革中的应用
当今世界上许多教育机构都面临着复杂的挑战。然而,教育系统中长期存在的实践和规范可能会阻碍教育者识别和应对这些挑战的能力,例如,只有校长领导变革工作,或者对定义不明确的挑战使用不一致的“权宜之计”。另一方面,一种以设计为基础的组织变革方法有望重塑当地教育机构(如学校)的变革。设计思维是制定基于设计的方法的一种方法,但很少有研究调查该过程的使用,以帮助教育者概念化和实施变化。根据转型学习理论,这项基于美国的混合方法研究考察了一个为期一年的专业学习研讨会,该研讨会由一个州教育机构赞助,使用设计思维来重新定义参与者如何在他们的环境中协调变化。结果表明,设计思维帮助参与者对自己和环境中的变化过程有了更细致的理解,然而,大多数参与者的行为继续受到美国教育系统长期以来的实践和规范的影响。最后,我们讨论了对实践和政策的影响,特别是对专业学习经验的需求,这些经验促使教育工作者批判性地反思他们的思维方式,以及他们的行为与这些思维方式有何不同。这种更好的理解可以使教育者更好地参与到解决教育中日益复杂的挑战的变革努力中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Change
Journal of Educational Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Educational Change is an international, professionally refereed, state-of-the-art scholarly journal, reflecting the most important ideas and evidence of educational change. The journal brings together some of the most influential thinkers and writers as well as emerging scholars on educational change. It deals with issues like educational innovation, reform and restructuring, school improvement and effectiveness, culture-building, inspection, school-review, and change management. It examines why some people resist change and what their resistance means. It looks at how men and women, older teachers and younger teachers, students, parents and others experience change differently. It looks at the positive aspects of change but does not hesitate to raise uncomfortable questions about many aspects of educational change either. It looks critically and controversially at the social, economic, cultural and political forces that are driving educational change. The Journal of Educational Change welcomes and supports contributions from a range of disciplines, including history, psychology, political science, sociology, anthropology, philosophy and administrative and organizational theory, and from a broad spectrum of methodologies including quantitative and qualitative approaches, documentary study, action research and conceptual development. School leaders, system administrators, teacher leaders, consultants, facilitators, educational researchers, staff developers and change agents of all kinds will find this journal an indispensable resource for guiding them to both classic and cutting-edge understandings of educational change. No other journal provides such comprehensive coverage of the field of educational change.
期刊最新文献
Coach and teacher alignment in the context of educational change. Promoting student voice by involving vocational education students and staff in citizenship education development: a participatory action research study. A mixed methods study of education researchers’ knowledge mobilization approaches “Embracing the essence of student voice…then doing something with the data”: One district’s critical use of evidence External facilitators’ practical work for school improvement: de-professionalising or developing improvement capacity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1