Book Review: Lily M. Hoffman and Barbara Schmitter Heisler, Airbnb, Short-Term Rentals and the Future of Housing

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY City & Community Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1177/15356841221076656
Alexandrea J. Ravenelle
{"title":"Book Review: Lily M. Hoffman and Barbara Schmitter Heisler, Airbnb, Short-Term Rentals and the Future of Housing","authors":"Alexandrea J. Ravenelle","doi":"10.1177/15356841221076656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have brought a collection of books examining the impact of the sharing economy on workers and on work, but much less attention has been paid to the impact on local communities. Airbnb, Short-Term Rentals and the Future of Housing focuses on the community impact, arguing that the most disruption from Airbnb and related short-term rental platforms has occurred in urban areas where housing markets are already stressed. Hoffman and Heisler utilize a case study approach with a focus on four American cities (New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Boston), compared to Australia (primarily Sydney and Melbourne) and Germany (Berlin and Munich). Although the authors note that homesharing is hardly new, Airbnb has “removed the rooming house stigma and made short-term rentals fashionable, even sexy, for potential travelers” (p. 11). In addition, the platform benefits from “the tech industry’s well-known freedom from regulation” (p. 13). But perhaps most of all, Airbnb has benefited from “financialization,” which the authors define as “the increasingly active role of financial institutions and processes” (p. 15). The securitization of mortgages and high-risk banking strategies, including subprime loans, contributed to the Great Recession, but the rise in foreclosures and the post-recession rise in housing prices also contributed to an increasing number of renters and increased demand for affordable housing. Meanwhile, rental housing has been a declining portion of the U.S. housing market, holding little attraction for private builders outside the high end of the market. Meanwhile, renters—the majority of households in most large cities—pay a larger share of their incomes for housing and are increasingly rent-burdened (spending more than 30 percent of their income on rent). Indeed, Hoffman and Heisler cite a 2020 Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University report noting that “in most metro areas at least 40 percent of renters are costburdened and in some locations the figure is as high as 56 percent” (p. 17). As the rental sector becomes more attractive for investors, “institutional and corporate ownership of rental property has increased as the percentage of individual owners has dramatically declined” (p. 18). Enter Airbnb as “an inexpensive way to travel . . . a solution to high rents and mortgages” and a product of “the neoliberal Zeitgeist that celebrated individual entrepreneurship and technological innovation” (p. 18). Chapter 2 is entitled “Cities, Data and Data Wars,” but that title could actually be applied to every chapter. With few exceptions, chapters generally follow a similar format of discussing the local housing stock, the rise of Airbnb locally, reports created by anti-Airbnb groups, the platform’s response, and various laws and legal challenges. While this may not actually be the goal of the book, it quickly becomes obvious that the challenges of Airbnb—and the reactions from locals—are often not unique. While some cities, such as Los Angeles, are seen as reluctant to take too much action in order to avoid 1076656 CTYXXX10.1177/15356841221076656City & CommunityBook Reviews book-review2022","PeriodicalId":47486,"journal":{"name":"City & Community","volume":"21 1","pages":"82 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City & Community","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15356841221076656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have brought a collection of books examining the impact of the sharing economy on workers and on work, but much less attention has been paid to the impact on local communities. Airbnb, Short-Term Rentals and the Future of Housing focuses on the community impact, arguing that the most disruption from Airbnb and related short-term rental platforms has occurred in urban areas where housing markets are already stressed. Hoffman and Heisler utilize a case study approach with a focus on four American cities (New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Boston), compared to Australia (primarily Sydney and Melbourne) and Germany (Berlin and Munich). Although the authors note that homesharing is hardly new, Airbnb has “removed the rooming house stigma and made short-term rentals fashionable, even sexy, for potential travelers” (p. 11). In addition, the platform benefits from “the tech industry’s well-known freedom from regulation” (p. 13). But perhaps most of all, Airbnb has benefited from “financialization,” which the authors define as “the increasingly active role of financial institutions and processes” (p. 15). The securitization of mortgages and high-risk banking strategies, including subprime loans, contributed to the Great Recession, but the rise in foreclosures and the post-recession rise in housing prices also contributed to an increasing number of renters and increased demand for affordable housing. Meanwhile, rental housing has been a declining portion of the U.S. housing market, holding little attraction for private builders outside the high end of the market. Meanwhile, renters—the majority of households in most large cities—pay a larger share of their incomes for housing and are increasingly rent-burdened (spending more than 30 percent of their income on rent). Indeed, Hoffman and Heisler cite a 2020 Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University report noting that “in most metro areas at least 40 percent of renters are costburdened and in some locations the figure is as high as 56 percent” (p. 17). As the rental sector becomes more attractive for investors, “institutional and corporate ownership of rental property has increased as the percentage of individual owners has dramatically declined” (p. 18). Enter Airbnb as “an inexpensive way to travel . . . a solution to high rents and mortgages” and a product of “the neoliberal Zeitgeist that celebrated individual entrepreneurship and technological innovation” (p. 18). Chapter 2 is entitled “Cities, Data and Data Wars,” but that title could actually be applied to every chapter. With few exceptions, chapters generally follow a similar format of discussing the local housing stock, the rise of Airbnb locally, reports created by anti-Airbnb groups, the platform’s response, and various laws and legal challenges. While this may not actually be the goal of the book, it quickly becomes obvious that the challenges of Airbnb—and the reactions from locals—are often not unique. While some cities, such as Los Angeles, are seen as reluctant to take too much action in order to avoid 1076656 CTYXXX10.1177/15356841221076656City & CommunityBook Reviews book-review2022
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:Lily M. Hoffman和Barbara Schmitter Heisler, Airbnb,短期租赁和住房的未来
近年来,人们收集了一系列书籍,研究共享经济对工人和工作的影响,但对当地社区的影响却很少关注。Airbnb、Short Term Rentals和the Future of Housing专注于社区影响,认为Airbnb和相关短期租赁平台的最大干扰发生在住房市场已经紧张的城市地区。Hoffman和Heisler采用案例研究方法,重点研究美国四个城市(纽约、旧金山、洛杉矶和波士顿),而澳大利亚(主要是悉尼和墨尔本)和德国(柏林和慕尼黑)。尽管作者指出,家庭共享并不是什么新鲜事,但爱彼迎已经“消除了租房的污名,让短期租房成为潜在旅行者的时尚,甚至性感”(第11页)。此外,该平台受益于“科技行业众所周知的免于监管的自由”(第13页)。但也许最重要的是,爱彼迎受益于“金融化”,作者将其定义为“金融机构和流程日益积极的作用”(第15页)。抵押贷款证券化和包括次级贷款在内的高风险银行策略导致了大衰退,但止赎权的增加和经济衰退后房价的上涨也导致了租房人数的增加和对经济适用房的需求增加。与此同时,租赁住房在美国住房市场中的份额一直在下降,对高端市场以外的私人建筑商几乎没有吸引力。与此同时,租房者——大多数大城市的大多数家庭——为住房支付了更大比例的收入,而且租金负担越来越重(将收入的30%以上用于租金)。事实上,Hoffman和Heisler引用了哈佛大学住房研究联合中心2020年的一份报告,指出“在大多数大都市地区,至少40%的租房者承担了成本负担,在一些地区,这一数字高达56%”(第17页)。随着租赁行业对投资者的吸引力越来越大,“随着个人业主比例的大幅下降,机构和公司对租赁物业的所有权有所增加”(第18页)。Airbnb是“一种廉价的旅行方式……解决高租金和抵押贷款的方案”,也是“庆祝个人创业和技术创新的新自由主义时代精神”的产物(第18页)。第二章的标题是“城市、数据和数据战争”,但这个标题实际上可以应用于每一章。除了少数例外,章节通常采用类似的形式讨论当地住房存量、Airbnb在当地的崛起、反Airbnb团体创建的报告、平台的回应以及各种法律和法律挑战。虽然这实际上可能不是这本书的目标,但很快就很明显,Airbnb的挑战——以及当地人的反应——往往不是独一无二的。虽然一些城市,如洛杉矶,被视为不愿意采取太多行动来避免1076656 CTYXX10.1177/155356841221076656城市与社区书评书评2022
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
City & Community
City & Community Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Environmentalizing Urban Sociology Origins of the Flint Water Crisis: Uneven Development, Urban Political Ecology, and Racial Capitalism Postscript: Environmentalize Urban Sociology? Spaces of Social Capital across Pandemic Time: COVID-19 Responses in Ho Chi Minh City’s High-rise and Low-rise Neighborhoods Cultural Policy Formation and State-Society Relations: Culture-led Urban Redevelopment of Enninglu in Guangzhou
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1