Commentary on Community-Based Participatory Research and Community Engaged Research in Health for Journal of Participatory Research Methods

N. Wallerstein
{"title":"Commentary on Community-Based Participatory Research and Community Engaged Research in Health for Journal of Participatory Research Methods","authors":"N. Wallerstein","doi":"10.35844/001c.13274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Launching a new journal on participatory research methods provides a wonderful opportunity to both acknowledge and deepen contributions to the vibrant fields of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and community-engaged research (CEnR) in the health fields. Many other disciplines, such as education, sociology, community and regional planning, communication, etc., share overlapping terms with similar commitments to shared power in research, including participatory action research, action research, participatory research, youth participatory action research, public involvement, practitioner research, collaborative research, citizen science, street science, and, a newer term in health, participatory health research, from the International Collaborative of Participatory Health Research. Within health, CBPR has been the most well-recognized form of community-engaged research for over thirty years (Wallerstein et al., 2018). Since 1998, it has operated with principles well-defined by Israel et al. (2013), and a widelydistributed definition launched in 2001 by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. The principles and definition ground research practitioners in long-term commitments to co-develop research with community partners, and to build from community strengths and priorities for the purposes of translating research results into policy, practice, or system-change actions towards improving health and health equity. Minkler et al. (2012) added the principles of cultural humility and importance of addressing racism, sexism, homophobia, and other inequities of power hierarchies within academiccommunity partnerships and in society. While CBPR has often been seen as calling for involvement of grassroots people from communities, neighborhood associations, or social movements, community partners in CBPR can extend to other stakeholders, such as staff from community-based organizations, public agencies or private-sector settings, and policy makers.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of participatory research methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.13274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Launching a new journal on participatory research methods provides a wonderful opportunity to both acknowledge and deepen contributions to the vibrant fields of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and community-engaged research (CEnR) in the health fields. Many other disciplines, such as education, sociology, community and regional planning, communication, etc., share overlapping terms with similar commitments to shared power in research, including participatory action research, action research, participatory research, youth participatory action research, public involvement, practitioner research, collaborative research, citizen science, street science, and, a newer term in health, participatory health research, from the International Collaborative of Participatory Health Research. Within health, CBPR has been the most well-recognized form of community-engaged research for over thirty years (Wallerstein et al., 2018). Since 1998, it has operated with principles well-defined by Israel et al. (2013), and a widelydistributed definition launched in 2001 by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. The principles and definition ground research practitioners in long-term commitments to co-develop research with community partners, and to build from community strengths and priorities for the purposes of translating research results into policy, practice, or system-change actions towards improving health and health equity. Minkler et al. (2012) added the principles of cultural humility and importance of addressing racism, sexism, homophobia, and other inequities of power hierarchies within academiccommunity partnerships and in society. While CBPR has often been seen as calling for involvement of grassroots people from communities, neighborhood associations, or social movements, community partners in CBPR can extend to other stakeholders, such as staff from community-based organizations, public agencies or private-sector settings, and policy makers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《参与性研究方法杂志》社区参与性研究与社区参与性健康研究述评
发起一份关于参与性研究方法的新期刊提供了一个极好的机会,可以承认并深化对卫生领域中充满活力的社区参与性研究(CBPR)和社区参与研究(CEnR)领域的贡献。许多其他学科,如教育、社会学、社区和区域规划、传播学等,都有重叠的术语,对研究中的共享权力有着类似的承诺,包括参与性行动研究、行动研究、参与性研究、青年参与性行动研究、公众参与、实践者研究、合作研究、公民科学、街头科学,以及卫生领域的一个新术语——参与性健康研究。来自国际参与卫生研究合作组织。在健康领域,30多年来,CBPR一直是社区参与研究中最受认可的形式(Wallerstein等人,2018)。自1998年以来,它一直遵循Israel等人(2013年)定义的原则,以及W.K. Kellogg基金会于2001年推出的广泛分布的定义。这些原则和定义为研究从业人员提供了长期承诺的基础,即与社区伙伴共同开展研究,并利用社区优势和优先事项,将研究成果转化为政策、实践或系统变革行动,以改善健康和卫生公平。Minkler等人(2012)补充了文化谦逊的原则,以及在学术界、社区伙伴关系和社会中解决种族主义、性别歧视、同性恋恐惧症和其他权力等级不平等问题的重要性。虽然CBPR通常被视为需要社区基层人民、邻里协会或社会运动的参与,但CBPR的社区合作伙伴可以扩展到其他利益相关者,如社区组织、公共机构或私营部门的工作人员以及政策制定者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: ”How Communities and Research Institutions Work Together to Dismantle Structural Racism and Advance Health Equity” Program Evaluation and Improvement by a Homeless Community Using a Human Centered Design Approach The RESPCCT Study: Community-led Development of a Person-Centered Instrument to Measure Health Equity in Perinatal Services The Equity-Centered Participatory Compensation Model (EPCM): A Tutorial for This Emergent Methodology Amplifying Youth Voices Using Digital Technology: A Case Study in Collaborative Research With Youth Service Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1