Can sustainability certification enhance the climate resilience of smallholder farmers? The case of Ghanaian cocoa

IF 3.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Land Use Science Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1747423X.2022.2097455
Thompson W.J, Blaser-Hart W.J, Joerin J, Krütli P, D. E, Kopainsky B, Chavez E., Garrett R.D, Six J
{"title":"Can sustainability certification enhance the climate resilience of smallholder farmers? The case of Ghanaian cocoa","authors":"Thompson W.J, Blaser-Hart W.J, Joerin J, Krütli P, D. E, Kopainsky B, Chavez E., Garrett R.D, Six J","doi":"10.1080/1747423X.2022.2097455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sustainability certification has been posited as a key governance mechanism to enhance the climate resilience of smallholder farmers. Whilst many certifications now include climate resilience in their standards, their ability to deliver this for smallholders remains untested. We take the case of the 2015–16 drought-shock to cocoa production in Ghana to examine whether certification can enhance smallholder climate resilience. We used a novel transdisciplinary methodology combining participatory outcome definition with household surveys, biophysical measurements, satellite data and counterfactual analysis. Utilising our climate resilience framework, we find that certification has a strong effect on the adoption of basic management, e.g. fertilization, but a weak influence on more complex resilience strategies, e.g. agroforest diversification. Beyond certification, we identify strong regional patterns in resilience. These findings suggest that certification has some potential to enhance climate resilience but greater focus on facilitating diversification and adapting to sub-national contexts is required for improved effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":56005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Land Use Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"407 - 428"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Land Use Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2022.2097455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sustainability certification has been posited as a key governance mechanism to enhance the climate resilience of smallholder farmers. Whilst many certifications now include climate resilience in their standards, their ability to deliver this for smallholders remains untested. We take the case of the 2015–16 drought-shock to cocoa production in Ghana to examine whether certification can enhance smallholder climate resilience. We used a novel transdisciplinary methodology combining participatory outcome definition with household surveys, biophysical measurements, satellite data and counterfactual analysis. Utilising our climate resilience framework, we find that certification has a strong effect on the adoption of basic management, e.g. fertilization, but a weak influence on more complex resilience strategies, e.g. agroforest diversification. Beyond certification, we identify strong regional patterns in resilience. These findings suggest that certification has some potential to enhance climate resilience but greater focus on facilitating diversification and adapting to sub-national contexts is required for improved effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续发展认证能否增强小农的气候适应能力?加纳可可的案例
可持续性认证被认为是提高小农气候适应能力的关键治理机制。虽然许多认证现在将气候适应能力纳入其标准,但它们为小农提供气候适应能力的能力仍未经检验。我们以2015-16年加纳的干旱冲击对可可生产的影响为例,研究认证是否可以提高小农的气候适应能力。我们使用了一种新的跨学科方法,将参与性结果定义与家庭调查、生物物理测量、卫星数据和反事实分析相结合。利用我们的气候适应能力框架,我们发现认证对采用基本管理(如施肥)有很强的影响,但对更复杂的适应能力策略(如农林业多样化)的影响较弱。除了认证之外,我们还确定了韧性方面的强大区域模式。这些发现表明,认证在增强气候适应能力方面具有一定的潜力,但要提高有效性,需要更加注重促进多样化和适应地方情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Land Use Science
Journal of Land Use Science Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Land Use Science provides a central outlet for high-quality articles on theoretical and empirical aspects of land-use science at the interface of social and environmental systems. The Journal brings together an array of research perspectives at multiple temporal, spatial and social scales that contribute a better understanding of land-system dynamics and communicate scientific advances towards attaining land-system sustainability.
期刊最新文献
How does the effect of urban growth management change over time and across urban land uses? Evidence from China’s construction land quotas Decision-making factors influencing land use transformation and its implication on forest landscape restoration in Ethiopia Critical overview of the expansion of Hass avocado plantations in Salamina, northern Caldas, Colombia Exploring land use conflicts arising from economic activities and their impacts on local communities in the European Arctic Industry-specific impacts of global drivers in the European Arctic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1