Predictors of mortality for blunt trauma patients in intensive care: A retrospective cohort study.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics F1000Research Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.138364.1
Michael Jennings, James Booker, Amy Addison, Rebecca Egglestone, Ahilanandan Dushianthan
{"title":"Predictors of mortality for blunt trauma patients in intensive care: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Michael Jennings, James Booker, Amy Addison, Rebecca Egglestone, Ahilanandan Dushianthan","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.138364.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major trauma places substantial demand on critical care services, is a leading cause of death in under 40-year-olds and causes significant morbidity and mortality across all age groups. Various factors influence patient outcome and predefining these could allow prognostication. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of mortality from major trauma in intensive care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of adult trauma patients admitted to general intensive care between January 2018 and December 2019. We assessed the impact on mortality of patient demographics, patterns of injury, injury scores (Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI), Acute Physiology and Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Probability of Survival Score (Ps19)), number of surgeries and mechanism of injury using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 414 patients were included with a median age of 54 years (IQR 34-72). Overall mortality was 18.6%. The most common mechanism of injury was traffic collision (46%). Non-survivors were older, had higher ISS scores with lower GCS on admission and lower probability of survival scores. Factors independently predictive of mortality were age 70-80 (OR 3.267, p = 0.029), age >80 (OR 27.043, p < 0.001) and GCS < 15 (OR 8.728, p < 0.001). Ps19 was the best predictor of mortality (p <0.001 for each score category), with an AUROC of 0.90.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The significant mortality predictors were age, fall from <2 metres, injury of head or limbs, GCS <15 and Ps19. Contrary to previous studies, CCI and APACHE II did not significantly predict mortality. Although Ps19 was found to be the best current prognostic score, trauma prognostication would benefit from a single validated scoring system incorporating both physiological variables and injury patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":" ","pages":"974"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.138364.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major trauma places substantial demand on critical care services, is a leading cause of death in under 40-year-olds and causes significant morbidity and mortality across all age groups. Various factors influence patient outcome and predefining these could allow prognostication. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of mortality from major trauma in intensive care.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult trauma patients admitted to general intensive care between January 2018 and December 2019. We assessed the impact on mortality of patient demographics, patterns of injury, injury scores (Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI), Acute Physiology and Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Probability of Survival Score (Ps19)), number of surgeries and mechanism of injury using logistic regression.

Results: A total of 414 patients were included with a median age of 54 years (IQR 34-72). Overall mortality was 18.6%. The most common mechanism of injury was traffic collision (46%). Non-survivors were older, had higher ISS scores with lower GCS on admission and lower probability of survival scores. Factors independently predictive of mortality were age 70-80 (OR 3.267, p = 0.029), age >80 (OR 27.043, p < 0.001) and GCS < 15 (OR 8.728, p < 0.001). Ps19 was the best predictor of mortality (p <0.001 for each score category), with an AUROC of 0.90.

Conclusions: The significant mortality predictors were age, fall from <2 metres, injury of head or limbs, GCS <15 and Ps19. Contrary to previous studies, CCI and APACHE II did not significantly predict mortality. Although Ps19 was found to be the best current prognostic score, trauma prognostication would benefit from a single validated scoring system incorporating both physiological variables and injury patterns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护中严重创伤患者死亡率的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:严重创伤对重症监护服务提出了巨大的需求,是40岁以下人群死亡的主要原因,并在所有年龄组中造成显著的发病率和死亡率。各种因素会影响患者的预后,预先定义这些因素可以进行预测。本研究的目的是确定重症监护中重大创伤死亡率的预测因素。方法:这是一项对2018年1月至2019年12月期间接受普通重症监护的成年创伤患者的回顾性研究。我们使用逻辑回归评估了患者人口统计学、损伤模式、损伤评分(格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、查尔森共病指数(CCI)、急性生理和健康评估II(APACHE II)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和生存概率评分(Ps19))、手术次数和损伤机制对死亡率的影响。结果:共纳入414名患者,中位年龄为54岁(IQR 34-72)。总死亡率为18.6%。最常见的损伤机制是交通碰撞(46%)。非幸存者年龄较大,ISS评分较高,入院GCS评分和生存概率评分较低。独立预测死亡率的因素是年龄增加(OR 1.06,p<0.001)和入院时GCS<15(OR 7.21,p<001)。Ps19是死亡率的最佳预测因子(每个评分类别p<0.001,AUROC为0.90)。结论:重要的死亡率预测因素是年龄、从<2米处坠落、头部或四肢损伤、GCS<15和Ps19。与之前的研究相反,CCI和APACHE II并没有显著预测死亡率。尽管Ps19被发现是目前最好的预后评分,但创伤预后将受益于一个综合了生理变量和损伤模式的单一验证评分系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
期刊最新文献
Biological properties of Moringa oleifera: A systematic review of the last decade. Experiences Using Media Health Claims to Teach Evidence-Based Practice to Healthcare Students: A Mixed Methods Study. Impact of distress and anxiety due to COVID-19 on digital addictions in university students in the third wave period . A reference genome for the eastern bettong ( Bettongia gaimardi). A systematic review of Streptococcus Mutans and Veillonellae species interactions in dental caries progression: Positive or Negative impact?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1