The Mental Toughness Questionniare-48: A Re-examination of Factorial Validity

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sport Psychology Pub Date : 2017-06-30 DOI:10.7352/IJSP.2017.48.331
Philip Birch, Simon Crampton, I. Greenlees, R. Lowry, P. Coffee
{"title":"The Mental Toughness Questionniare-48: A Re-examination of Factorial Validity","authors":"Philip Birch, Simon Crampton, I. Greenlees, R. Lowry, P. Coffee","doi":"10.7352/IJSP.2017.48.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Mental Toughness Questionnaire-48 (MTQ48; Clough, Earle, & Sewell, 2002) is the most utilised instrument to measure Mental Toughness in sport (Gucciardi, Hanton, & Mallett, 2012). To date, preliminary research (Gucciardi et al., 2012; Perry et al., 2013) examining the factorial validity of the MTQ48 in athlete samples has yielded equivocal findings. The aim of this paper was to re-examine the factorial validity of the four- and six-factor models of the MTQ48 in moderate (n = 480) and large (n = 1206) independent student athlete samples. Using confirmatory factor analyses, findings revealed little support for the hypothesised models of the MTQ48 in both samples. The results support those found by Gucciardi et al. and Perry et al. and suggest that, in its current form, the MTQ48 may not be a valid measure of the 4/6Cs model of mental toughness when using student athletes.","PeriodicalId":54940,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Psychology","volume":"48 1","pages":"331-355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7352/IJSP.2017.48.331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The Mental Toughness Questionnaire-48 (MTQ48; Clough, Earle, & Sewell, 2002) is the most utilised instrument to measure Mental Toughness in sport (Gucciardi, Hanton, & Mallett, 2012). To date, preliminary research (Gucciardi et al., 2012; Perry et al., 2013) examining the factorial validity of the MTQ48 in athlete samples has yielded equivocal findings. The aim of this paper was to re-examine the factorial validity of the four- and six-factor models of the MTQ48 in moderate (n = 480) and large (n = 1206) independent student athlete samples. Using confirmatory factor analyses, findings revealed little support for the hypothesised models of the MTQ48 in both samples. The results support those found by Gucciardi et al. and Perry et al. and suggest that, in its current form, the MTQ48 may not be a valid measure of the 4/6Cs model of mental toughness when using student athletes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理韧性问卷-48:因子效度的再检验
心理韧性问卷-48 (MTQ48;Clough, Earle, & Sewell, 2002)是测量运动中心理韧性最常用的工具(Gucciardi, Hanton, & Mallett, 2012)。迄今为止,初步研究(guucciardi et al., 2012;Perry et al., 2013)在运动员样本中检验MTQ48的析因效度得出了模棱两可的结果。本文的目的是重新检验MTQ48的四因子和六因子模型在中等(n = 480)和大型(n = 1206)独立学生运动员样本中的析因效度。使用验证性因子分析,发现在两个样本中几乎不支持MTQ48的假设模型。结果支持guucciardi等人和Perry等人的发现,并表明,在目前的形式下,当使用学生运动员时,MTQ48可能不是对4/ 6c心理韧性模型的有效测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sport Psychology publishes empirical and theoretical contributions in the human movement sciences from all over the world. Manuscripts related to psychology, sport pedagogy, exercise and sport performance are suited to the Journal''s scope. IJSP''s aims are to disseminate results of rigorous and relevant studies, to expose positions and commentaries regarding the development of theory and confirmation or contradiction of previous findings. IJSP entertains various methodologies encompassing coherence among epistemology, research questions, tools, statistical or clinical analyses and discussion or potential applications. Qualitative and quantitative analyses as well as case studies are of interest when appropriately used. IJSP is comprised of the following sections related to human movement sciences: -Motor learning and control -Cognition -Health and exercise -Social psychology -Intervention / Clinical / counseling psychology
期刊最新文献
Arousal, Stress, Anxiety, and Performance Self-Confidence Competition and Audience Effects Motivation Physical Skill Acquisition and Behaviour Modification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1