{"title":"On a Psychology of Shame","authors":"G. Simmel, A. M. Soto","doi":"10.7238/D.V0I21.3116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Zur Psychologie der Scham”, which translates as “On the Psychology of Shame”, was written by Simmel in 1901 for the Vienna newspaper Die Zeit. Unlike other articles by the German philosopher, in this one he reviews and explicitly questions the work and research of one his contemporaries: Havelock Ellis (1859-1939), the physician and sexologist whose explanations of the origin of the feeling of shame and embarrassment gave rise – at the time – to debate on the matter. It is, in turn, Simmel’s response and contribution to this debate, from a perspective that draws on both psychological and sociological elements. It is thus not confined to a merely critical review, making it Simmel’s own contribution to the specific issue of shame; a contribution which, incidentally, is closely related to the part of his work concerned with emotions, feelings and attachments between humans.","PeriodicalId":51964,"journal":{"name":"Digithum","volume":"1 1","pages":"67-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digithum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7238/D.V0I21.3116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47
Abstract
“Zur Psychologie der Scham”, which translates as “On the Psychology of Shame”, was written by Simmel in 1901 for the Vienna newspaper Die Zeit. Unlike other articles by the German philosopher, in this one he reviews and explicitly questions the work and research of one his contemporaries: Havelock Ellis (1859-1939), the physician and sexologist whose explanations of the origin of the feeling of shame and embarrassment gave rise – at the time – to debate on the matter. It is, in turn, Simmel’s response and contribution to this debate, from a perspective that draws on both psychological and sociological elements. It is thus not confined to a merely critical review, making it Simmel’s own contribution to the specific issue of shame; a contribution which, incidentally, is closely related to the part of his work concerned with emotions, feelings and attachments between humans.
“Zur Psychologie der Scham”,翻译为“论羞耻心理”,西梅尔于1901年为维也纳报纸《时代周报》撰写。与这位德国哲学家的其他文章不同,在这篇文章中,他回顾并明确质疑了同时代人哈维洛克·埃利斯(1859-1939)的工作和研究,他是一位医生和性学家,对羞耻感和尴尬感起源的解释在当时引发了对此事的辩论。这反过来又是西梅尔对这场辩论的回应和贡献,从心理学和社会学的角度来看。因此,它不仅仅局限于批判性的审查,使其成为西梅尔自己对具体的羞耻问题的贡献;顺便说一句,这一贡献与他的作品中涉及人类之间的情感、感受和依恋的部分密切相关。
期刊介绍:
Digithum applies a relational perspective in the analysis of processes of inclusion and social exclusion, subjective experiences, social ties, cultural heritage and cultural production and consumption.