Religion versus Politics: An age-old question with continued importance to the U.S. nonprofit classification system

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research Pub Date : 2022-11-23 DOI:10.2308/jltr-2022-001
Julia M Camp, John J. Masselli, Amy J. N. Yurko
{"title":"Religion versus Politics: An age-old question with continued importance to the U.S. nonprofit classification system","authors":"Julia M Camp, John J. Masselli, Amy J. N. Yurko","doi":"10.2308/jltr-2022-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IRC §501(c)(3) grants federal tax exemption to nonprofit organizations, such as public charities, private foundations, and private operating foundations. Religious organizations classified as churches receive added preferential treatment, specifically exemption from certain filing requirements and statutory audit protection through §7611. Section 527 grants most political organizations tax-exempt status, though they are subject to tax on some income, not exempt from filing requirements and do not receive tax deductible donations. This extreme disparity in treatment may incentivize political organizations to reconfigure their missions and organizational structures to meet the litmus test for classification as a church. Following the awarding of church status to some seemingly politically charged organizations, we investigate this issue and propose that it is time for the U.S. Congress and the IRS to revisit, evaluate, and revamp the existing system to prevent political organizations from abusing the tax provisions intended to benefit churches.","PeriodicalId":40374,"journal":{"name":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jltr-2022-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IRC §501(c)(3) grants federal tax exemption to nonprofit organizations, such as public charities, private foundations, and private operating foundations. Religious organizations classified as churches receive added preferential treatment, specifically exemption from certain filing requirements and statutory audit protection through §7611. Section 527 grants most political organizations tax-exempt status, though they are subject to tax on some income, not exempt from filing requirements and do not receive tax deductible donations. This extreme disparity in treatment may incentivize political organizations to reconfigure their missions and organizational structures to meet the litmus test for classification as a church. Following the awarding of church status to some seemingly politically charged organizations, we investigate this issue and propose that it is time for the U.S. Congress and the IRS to revisit, evaluate, and revamp the existing system to prevent political organizations from abusing the tax provisions intended to benefit churches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教与政治:一个古老的问题,对美国非营利组织的分类系统仍然很重要
IRC§501(c)(3)向非营利组织(如公共慈善机构、私人基金会和私人运营基金会)提供联邦免税。被归类为教会的宗教组织获得了额外的优惠待遇,特别是通过§7611免于某些备案要求和法定审计保护。第527条赋予大多数政治组织免税地位,尽管他们的一些收入需要纳税,不免除申报要求,也不接受可减税的捐款。这种待遇上的极端差异可能会激励政治组织重新配置其使命和组织结构,以满足教堂分类的试金石。在将教会地位授予一些看似充满政治色彩的组织之后,我们对这一问题进行了调查,并建议美国国会和国税局是时候重新审视、评估和修改现有制度,以防止政治组织滥用旨在造福教会的税收规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Fill in the Blank? A Discussion of Prefilled Tax Returns in the U.S. Does Notice 2014-21 Need an Update? An Analysis of Potential Tax Classifications for Cryptocurrency Covers and Front Matter Editorial Policy Pathology of The Legal Gap in the Tax Collection and Payment Stage (A Comparative Study of The IRS and The United States)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1