Quality of voluntary modern slavery disclosures: top Australian listed companies

IF 2.1 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Pacific Accounting Review Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1108/par-07-2021-0117
K. Rao, R. Burritt, K. Christ
{"title":"Quality of voluntary modern slavery disclosures: top Australian listed companies","authors":"K. Rao, R. Burritt, K. Christ","doi":"10.1108/par-07-2021-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere is a growing concern over the need for greater transparency of quality information by companies about modern slavery to contribute toward elimination of the practice. Hence, this paper aims to examine factors behind the quality of voluntary modern slavery disclosures and major sources of pressure on Australian company disclosures in a premodern slavery legislated environment.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nContent analysis and cross- sectional regression modeling are conducted to analyze factors determining the quality of voluntary modern slavery disclosures of the top 100 firms listed on the Australian Stock Exchange and their implications for institutional pressures.\n\n\nFindings\nResults indicate that size, assurance by Big-4 firms and publication of stand-alone modern slavery statements are significant drivers of disclosure quality in the sample. Profitability, listing status and the degree of internationalization are found to be unrelated to the quality of voluntary modern slavery disclosures. Industry classification is significant but only partly supports the prediction, and further investigation is recommended.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper provides a foundation for regulators and companies toward improving the quality of their modern slavery risk disclosures with a particular focus on prior experience, assurance and size. In practice, contrary to suggestions in the literature, results indicate that monetary penalties are unlikely to be an effective means for improving the quality of modern slavery disclosure. Results of the study provide evidence of poor quality of disclosures and the need for improvement, prior to introduction of modern slavery legislation in Australia in 2018. It also confirms that regulation to improve transparency, through the required publication of a modern slavery statement, is significant but not enough on its own to increase disclosure quality.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first research examining company level factors with an impact on voluntary modern slavery disclosure quality and the links to institutional pressures, prior to the introduction of the Commonwealth Modern Slavery Act 2018.\n","PeriodicalId":46088,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Accounting Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/par-07-2021-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose There is a growing concern over the need for greater transparency of quality information by companies about modern slavery to contribute toward elimination of the practice. Hence, this paper aims to examine factors behind the quality of voluntary modern slavery disclosures and major sources of pressure on Australian company disclosures in a premodern slavery legislated environment. Design/methodology/approach Content analysis and cross- sectional regression modeling are conducted to analyze factors determining the quality of voluntary modern slavery disclosures of the top 100 firms listed on the Australian Stock Exchange and their implications for institutional pressures. Findings Results indicate that size, assurance by Big-4 firms and publication of stand-alone modern slavery statements are significant drivers of disclosure quality in the sample. Profitability, listing status and the degree of internationalization are found to be unrelated to the quality of voluntary modern slavery disclosures. Industry classification is significant but only partly supports the prediction, and further investigation is recommended. Practical implications This paper provides a foundation for regulators and companies toward improving the quality of their modern slavery risk disclosures with a particular focus on prior experience, assurance and size. In practice, contrary to suggestions in the literature, results indicate that monetary penalties are unlikely to be an effective means for improving the quality of modern slavery disclosure. Results of the study provide evidence of poor quality of disclosures and the need for improvement, prior to introduction of modern slavery legislation in Australia in 2018. It also confirms that regulation to improve transparency, through the required publication of a modern slavery statement, is significant but not enough on its own to increase disclosure quality. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first research examining company level factors with an impact on voluntary modern slavery disclosure quality and the links to institutional pressures, prior to the introduction of the Commonwealth Modern Slavery Act 2018.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自愿披露现代奴役信息的质量:澳大利亚顶级上市公司
目的人们越来越担心,公司需要提高有关现代奴隶制的高质量信息的透明度,以帮助消除这种做法。因此,本文旨在研究现代奴隶制自愿披露质量背后的因素,以及在前现代奴隶制立法环境中澳大利亚公司披露压力的主要来源。设计/方法/方法进行内容分析和横断面回归建模,以分析决定澳大利亚证券交易所前100家上市公司自愿现代奴隶制披露质量的因素及其对制度压力的影响。调查结果表明,规模、四大公司的保证以及独立的现代奴隶制声明的发布是样本披露质量的重要驱动因素。盈利能力、上市状态和国际化程度被发现与现代奴隶制自愿披露的质量无关。行业分类意义重大,但仅部分支持预测,建议进行进一步调查。实际含义本文为监管机构和公司提高现代奴隶制风险披露的质量提供了基础,特别关注先前的经验、保证和规模。在实践中,与文献中的建议相反,研究结果表明,罚款不太可能成为提高现代奴隶制披露质量的有效手段。这项研究的结果提供了证据,证明在2018年澳大利亚引入现代奴隶制立法之前,披露的质量很差,需要改进。它还证实,通过要求发布现代奴隶制声明来提高透明度的监管意义重大,但其本身不足以提高披露质量。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是在2018年《英联邦现代奴隶制法案》出台之前,第一项研究公司层面的因素对自愿现代奴隶制披露质量的影响以及与制度压力的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific Accounting Review
Pacific Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Pacific Accounting Review is a quarterly journal publishing original research papers and book reviews. The journal is supported by all New Zealand Universities and has the backing of academics from many universities in the Pacific region. The journal publishes papers from both empirical and theoretical forms of research into current developments in accounting and finance and provides insight into how present practice is shaped and formed. Specific areas include but are not limited to: - Emerging Markets and Economies - Political/Social contexts - Financial Reporting - Auditing and Governance - Management Accounting.
期刊最新文献
Auditor mood and audit quality: evidence from music sentiment measure Dissatisfaction with professional accountant training: the role of learning styles CSR disclosure quantity to CSR disclosure quality – in pursuit of a disclosure quality index Social capital and business strategy Corporate tax performance and the COVID-19 pandemic: empirical evidence from Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1