Right–side predominance of the central amygdala activation in trigeminal inflammatory pain model

Pain Research Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI:10.11154/pain.35.10
Yukari Takahashi, Yuta Miyazawa, Daigo Arimura, Y. Sugimura, F. Kato
{"title":"Right–side predominance of the central amygdala activation in trigeminal inflammatory pain model","authors":"Yukari Takahashi, Yuta Miyazawa, Daigo Arimura, Y. Sugimura, F. Kato","doi":"10.11154/pain.35.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The central amygdala (CeA), especially the capsular part (CeC), receives nociceptive information from the superficial layer of the spinal dorsal horn and the caudal subnucleus of the trigeminal nucleus via the lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPB). The synapse between LPB and CeC neurons, forming the final stage of this spino–(trigemino–)parabrachio–amygdaloid pathway, undergoes robust synaptic potentiation in various types of rodent pain models, thus contributing to the enhanced nociception–emotion link in persistent pain. A remarkable feature of the CeA activation in animals with inflammatory pain is the right–side predominance. Using a trigeminal pain model by injecting formalin to the upper lip unilaterally, we analyzed the right–left differences in LPB–CeC synaptic potentiation and c–Fos expression in the LPB and the amygdala to reveal what determines the right– predomi nance in CeA activation. Unilateral trigeminal inflammation induced 1 ) a significant bilateral increase in c–Fos–expression in the LPB, 2 ) a right–predominant LPB–CeC synaptic potentiation and 3 ) a right–predominant increase in c– Fos–expression in the CeA, regardless of the side of the inflammation. Though c– Fos expression in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) was not significantly increased in this model, the number of c–Fos positive cells between the BLA and CeA was cor-related compared to that between the LPB and CeA. Therefore, the right–side predominance of the CeA activation in the inflammatory pain models would not be a simple consequence of lateralized LPB activation but rather involves non–Hebbian plasticity inherent to the CeA neurons and inputs they receive.","PeriodicalId":41148,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11154/pain.35.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The central amygdala (CeA), especially the capsular part (CeC), receives nociceptive information from the superficial layer of the spinal dorsal horn and the caudal subnucleus of the trigeminal nucleus via the lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPB). The synapse between LPB and CeC neurons, forming the final stage of this spino–(trigemino–)parabrachio–amygdaloid pathway, undergoes robust synaptic potentiation in various types of rodent pain models, thus contributing to the enhanced nociception–emotion link in persistent pain. A remarkable feature of the CeA activation in animals with inflammatory pain is the right–side predominance. Using a trigeminal pain model by injecting formalin to the upper lip unilaterally, we analyzed the right–left differences in LPB–CeC synaptic potentiation and c–Fos expression in the LPB and the amygdala to reveal what determines the right– predomi nance in CeA activation. Unilateral trigeminal inflammation induced 1 ) a significant bilateral increase in c–Fos–expression in the LPB, 2 ) a right–predominant LPB–CeC synaptic potentiation and 3 ) a right–predominant increase in c– Fos–expression in the CeA, regardless of the side of the inflammation. Though c– Fos expression in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) was not significantly increased in this model, the number of c–Fos positive cells between the BLA and CeA was cor-related compared to that between the LPB and CeA. Therefore, the right–side predominance of the CeA activation in the inflammatory pain models would not be a simple consequence of lateralized LPB activation but rather involves non–Hebbian plasticity inherent to the CeA neurons and inputs they receive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三叉神经炎性疼痛模型中中央杏仁核激活的右侧优势
中央杏仁核(CeA),尤其是包膜部分(CeC),通过臂旁外侧核(LPB)接收来自脊髓背角浅层和三叉神经核尾侧亚核的伤害性信息。LPB和CeC神经元之间的突触形成了这种棘-(三叉神经-)臂旁-杏仁核通路的最后阶段,在各种类型的啮齿动物疼痛模型中经历了强大的突触增强,从而有助于增强持续疼痛中的伤害感受-情绪联系。炎症性疼痛动物的CeA激活的一个显著特征是右侧优势。使用单侧上唇注射福尔马林的三叉神经疼痛模型,我们分析了LPB和杏仁核中LPB–CeC突触增强和c–Fos表达的左右差异,以揭示是什么决定了CeA激活的右前效应。单侧三叉神经炎症诱导1)LPB中c–Fos–表达的双侧显著增加,2)右侧为主的LPB–CeC突触增强,3)无论炎症的哪一侧,CeA中c–Fos–表达都以右侧为主。尽管在该模型中,基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)中的c–Fos表达没有显著增加,但与LPB和CeA相比,BLA和CeA之间的c–Fos阳性细胞数量是相关的。因此,在炎性疼痛模型中,CeA激活的右侧优势不是LPB侧化激活的简单结果,而是涉及CeA神经元固有的非Hebbian可塑性及其接受的输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research
Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Interaction between dorsal horn neuron subsets operated by a neuropeptide Y and prodynorphin promoter and its contribution to Aβ fiber–induced allodynia–like behavior in rats Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Outcomes of 707 cervical selective nerve root blocks using a fluoroscopy–guided posterolateral oblique approach Exploratory study of factors affecting quality of life among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A cross–sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1