No benefit of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine in reducing mortality in adult sepsis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Qing Zhao, Jian-guo Xiao, Huiyong Liu
{"title":"No benefit of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine in reducing mortality in adult sepsis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Qing Zhao, Jian-guo Xiao, Huiyong Liu","doi":"10.1097/EC9.0000000000000036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Supplementation of corticosteroid, ascorbic acid and thiamine in adult septic patients remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid and thiamine (HAT) in adult septic patients. Methods Data search included Pumbed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to Sep, 2021. Only studies with classifications of sepsis and intravenous HAT treatment were included. Adult patients with sepsis (aged ≥18 years) were divided into 2 groups. The treatment group received HAT therapy, whereas the control group received standard care and/or intravenous hydrocortisone. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Results Eleven studies including 4579 patients who fulfilled the predefined criteria were analyzed (6 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 5 clinical cohort studies). No hospital mortality reduction was demonstrated in patients treated with HAT when compared to the reference (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.27; I2 = 39%) group. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score decrement at 72hours was more significant in HAT-treated patients (mean difference [MD]: –1.23; 95% CI: –1.94 to –0.53; I2 = 81%). There was no difference in the duration of vasopressor use between HAT-treated patients and controls (MD: –4.92; 95% CI: –24.38 to 14.53; I2 = 97%). Statistical heterogeneity was noted with no sign of significant publication bias. Conclusion In adult sepsis and septic shock patients, HAT treatment failed to reduce mortality or shorten vasopressor duration, but reduced SOFA scores.","PeriodicalId":72895,"journal":{"name":"Emergency and critical care medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Supplementation of corticosteroid, ascorbic acid and thiamine in adult septic patients remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid and thiamine (HAT) in adult septic patients. Methods Data search included Pumbed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to Sep, 2021. Only studies with classifications of sepsis and intravenous HAT treatment were included. Adult patients with sepsis (aged ≥18 years) were divided into 2 groups. The treatment group received HAT therapy, whereas the control group received standard care and/or intravenous hydrocortisone. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Results Eleven studies including 4579 patients who fulfilled the predefined criteria were analyzed (6 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 5 clinical cohort studies). No hospital mortality reduction was demonstrated in patients treated with HAT when compared to the reference (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.27; I2 = 39%) group. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score decrement at 72hours was more significant in HAT-treated patients (mean difference [MD]: –1.23; 95% CI: –1.94 to –0.53; I2 = 81%). There was no difference in the duration of vasopressor use between HAT-treated patients and controls (MD: –4.92; 95% CI: –24.38 to 14.53; I2 = 97%). Statistical heterogeneity was noted with no sign of significant publication bias. Conclusion In adult sepsis and septic shock patients, HAT treatment failed to reduce mortality or shorten vasopressor duration, but reduced SOFA scores.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氢化可的松、抗坏血酸和硫胺素在降低成人败血症患者死亡率方面没有益处:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
摘要背景在成人脓毒症患者中补充皮质类固醇、抗坏血酸和硫胺素仍然存在争议。我们旨在评估氢化可的松、抗坏血酸和硫胺素(HAT)治疗成人败血症患者的疗效和安全性。方法从成立到2021年9月,数据检索包括Pumbed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆。仅包括败血症分类和静脉注射HAT治疗的研究。成年败血症患者(年龄≥18岁)分为2组。治疗组接受HAT治疗,而对照组接受标准护理和/或静脉注射氢化可的松。主要结果是住院死亡率。结果分析了11项研究,包括4579名符合预定义标准的患者(6项随机对照试验和5项临床队列研究)。与对照组相比,接受HAT治疗的患者的住院死亡率没有降低(OR:0.99;95%CI:0.77至1.27;I2=39%)。HAT治疗患者在72小时时的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分下降更为显著(平均差异[MD]:-1.23;95%置信区间:-1.94至-0.53;I2=81%)。HAT治疗的患者和对照组使用血管升压药的持续时间没有差异(MD:–4.92;95%CI:–24.38至14.53;I2=97%)。统计异质性被注意到,没有显著的发表偏倚的迹象。结论在成人败血症和感染性休克患者中,HAT治疗未能降低死亡率或缩短血管升压药持续时间,但降低了SOFA评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical analysis of patients with deep sternal wound infection-induced sepsis: a retrospective cohort study Exploring the effects of coronary artery disease as a preexisting comorbidity on mortality in hospitalized septic patients: a retrospective observation study An unusual anterior mitral leaflet perforation in a patient with no infective endocarditis: a case report Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia in critically ill patients: does bedside laparoscopy offer any real benefit? Congestive heart failure and sepsis a retrospective study of hospitalization outcomes from a rural hospital in Southwest Missouri: Erratum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1