Evaluation of an In-house Indirect ELISA for Differential Detection of IgM and IgG anti-Brucella Antibodies in Human Brucellosis

IF 0.7 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.22207/jpam.17.3.27
Sudipta Patra, Muneera M. Sahib, G. Shanmugam, Somy Skariah, S. Shamshad, Nagalingam Mohandoss, B. Shome, R. Shome
{"title":"Evaluation of an In-house Indirect ELISA for Differential Detection of IgM and IgG anti-Brucella Antibodies in Human Brucellosis","authors":"Sudipta Patra, Muneera M. Sahib, G. Shanmugam, Somy Skariah, S. Shamshad, Nagalingam Mohandoss, B. Shome, R. Shome","doi":"10.22207/jpam.17.3.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brucellosis caused by various species of the genus Brucella is one of the most important zoonotic diseases of global importance with veterinary, public health, and economic concerns. The study aimed to standardize IgM and IgG-based iELISA to detect anti-Brucella antibodies for serodiagnosis of acute and chronic human brucellosis. The test was standardized using 1:320 dilution of smooth lipopolysaccharide (sLPS) antigen from B. abortus S99 strain, 1:80 serum dilution, 1:4000 anti-human IgM and IgG conjugates, respectively for both IgM and IgG iELISA. The cut-off using 50 each brucellosis positive and negative human sera panel samples was set at ≥ 42 for both IgM and IgG iELISA. A total of 700 human sera samples were evaluated (137 veterinary doctors, 157 artificial inseminators, and 406 veterinary assistants). Overall, the study detected 8.3%, 8.1%, 8%, and 6.1% positivity by in-house IgG iELISA, RBPT, IgM iELISA, and SAT tests, respectively. Considering commercial iELISA kit as a gold standard, the sensitivities of IgM and IgG iELISA were 90% and 97.9%, respectively, whereas, specificities were >99%. The study established >98% specificity and >90% sensitivity for differential detection of immunoglobulin classes in the standardized iELISA. The developed assay outperformed the other evaluated tests with a shorter assay time and can be implemented in both endemic and non-endemic regions for surveillance and diagnosis of human brucellosis.","PeriodicalId":16968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22207/jpam.17.3.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brucellosis caused by various species of the genus Brucella is one of the most important zoonotic diseases of global importance with veterinary, public health, and economic concerns. The study aimed to standardize IgM and IgG-based iELISA to detect anti-Brucella antibodies for serodiagnosis of acute and chronic human brucellosis. The test was standardized using 1:320 dilution of smooth lipopolysaccharide (sLPS) antigen from B. abortus S99 strain, 1:80 serum dilution, 1:4000 anti-human IgM and IgG conjugates, respectively for both IgM and IgG iELISA. The cut-off using 50 each brucellosis positive and negative human sera panel samples was set at ≥ 42 for both IgM and IgG iELISA. A total of 700 human sera samples were evaluated (137 veterinary doctors, 157 artificial inseminators, and 406 veterinary assistants). Overall, the study detected 8.3%, 8.1%, 8%, and 6.1% positivity by in-house IgG iELISA, RBPT, IgM iELISA, and SAT tests, respectively. Considering commercial iELISA kit as a gold standard, the sensitivities of IgM and IgG iELISA were 90% and 97.9%, respectively, whereas, specificities were >99%. The study established >98% specificity and >90% sensitivity for differential detection of immunoglobulin classes in the standardized iELISA. The developed assay outperformed the other evaluated tests with a shorter assay time and can be implemented in both endemic and non-endemic regions for surveillance and diagnosis of human brucellosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
室内间接ELISA鉴别检测布鲁氏菌病IgM和IgG抗体的评价
由布鲁氏菌属不同物种引起的布鲁氏菌病是最重要的人畜共患疾病之一,具有全球重要的兽医、公共卫生和经济意义。本研究旨在标准化基于IgM和IgG的iELISA检测抗布鲁氏菌抗体,用于急性和慢性人类布鲁氏菌病的血清学诊断。使用流产B.abortus S99菌株的光滑脂多糖(sLPS)抗原的1:320稀释液、1:80血清稀释液、1:4000抗人IgM和IgG偶联物分别进行IgM和IgG-iELISA标准化测试。IgM和IgG-iELISA使用50份布鲁氏菌病阳性和阴性人类血清样本的截止值均设置为≥42。共评估了700份人类血清样本(137名兽医、157名人工授精师和406名兽医助理)。总体而言,该研究通过内部IgG iELISA、RBPT、IgM iELISA和SAT测试分别检测到8.3%、8.1%、8%和6.1%的阳性率。以市售iELISA试剂盒为金标准,IgM和IgG-iELISA的敏感性分别为90%和97.9%,特异性>99%。该研究确定了标准化iELISA中免疫球蛋白类别差异检测的特异性>98%,敏感性>90%。所开发的检测方法以更短的检测时间优于其他评估的检测方法,可以在流行和非流行地区实施,用于监测和诊断人类布鲁氏菌病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
266
审稿时长
11 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology (JPAM) is a peer-reviewed, open access international journal of microbiology aims to advance and disseminate research among scientists, academics, clinicians and microbiologists around the world. JPAM publishes high-quality research in all aspects of microbiology in both online and print form on quarterly basis.
期刊最新文献
Screening of Group B Streptococcal and Candida Infections in Antenatal Women Visiting a Tertiary Care Hospital and the Neonatal Outcome The C. auris Epidemic: Understanding its Impact on ICU Patients Lactic Acid Bacteria as an Exopolysaccharides (EPS) Producing Starter from Pakoba Fruit (Syzygium sp.), Endemic Species at Minahasa, North Sulawesi GC-MS Characterization of Eupatorium odoratum (L.) Leaves Essential Oil and Evaluation of In vitro Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity An Account of Hygienic Practices and Street Food Safety Around the Medical Colleges of Kolkata, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1