Distribution patterns of planted-shrubs of different restoration ages in artificial sand-fixing regions in the southeastern Tengger Desert

IF 0.6 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions Pub Date : 2020-04-27 DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1226.2020.00119
Meiling Liu, Ning Chen, Ruiqing Zhu
{"title":"Distribution patterns of planted-shrubs of different restoration ages in artificial sand-fixing regions in the southeastern Tengger Desert","authors":"Meiling Liu, Ning Chen, Ruiqing Zhu","doi":"10.3724/SP.J.1226.2020.00119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plant density and spatial distribution in artificial vegetation is obviously initialized at the planting stage. Plant dynamics and spatial pattern may change over time as the result of interactions between individual plants and habitats, but whether it's applied for desert shrubs in artificial sand-fixing regions remains unknown. Here we examined changes in plant densi‐ ty and distribution patterns of three shrubs (Artemisia ordosica Krasch, Caragana korshinskii Kom, and Hedysarum sco‐ parium Fisch.) in different regions, which have been restored for 27, 32 and 50 years (R27, R32, R50), respectively. The vegetation analysis shows that A. ordosica was the dominated species across the 3 restoration regions. The density of A. or‐ dosica and H. scoparium show a significant increase from R27 to R32, then decreased in R50. The density of C. korshin‐ skii was low in R32 and R50, lower in R27. The variance-to-mean ratio (VMR) was used to characterize spatial distribu‐ tion patterns to fit the observed densities of the three shrubs by frequency. A. ordosica and C. korshinskii both show signifi‐ cantly clumped distributions in three restoration regions. H. scoparium show a uniform distribution in R27 and R50, but a clumped distribution in R32. These results show that A. ordosica seems to be more adaptable in revegetated desert areas compared to C. korshinskii and H. scoparium. Pattern analysis suggests a successive replacement of C. korshinskii, which had low proportions of survived shrubs, by the dominant A. ordosica. This study contributes to the understanding of the distribution patterns of shrubs plants in revegetation projects in arid desert areas.","PeriodicalId":45200,"journal":{"name":"Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1226.2020.00119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant density and spatial distribution in artificial vegetation is obviously initialized at the planting stage. Plant dynamics and spatial pattern may change over time as the result of interactions between individual plants and habitats, but whether it's applied for desert shrubs in artificial sand-fixing regions remains unknown. Here we examined changes in plant densi‐ ty and distribution patterns of three shrubs (Artemisia ordosica Krasch, Caragana korshinskii Kom, and Hedysarum sco‐ parium Fisch.) in different regions, which have been restored for 27, 32 and 50 years (R27, R32, R50), respectively. The vegetation analysis shows that A. ordosica was the dominated species across the 3 restoration regions. The density of A. or‐ dosica and H. scoparium show a significant increase from R27 to R32, then decreased in R50. The density of C. korshin‐ skii was low in R32 and R50, lower in R27. The variance-to-mean ratio (VMR) was used to characterize spatial distribu‐ tion patterns to fit the observed densities of the three shrubs by frequency. A. ordosica and C. korshinskii both show signifi‐ cantly clumped distributions in three restoration regions. H. scoparium show a uniform distribution in R27 and R50, but a clumped distribution in R32. These results show that A. ordosica seems to be more adaptable in revegetated desert areas compared to C. korshinskii and H. scoparium. Pattern analysis suggests a successive replacement of C. korshinskii, which had low proportions of survived shrubs, by the dominant A. ordosica. This study contributes to the understanding of the distribution patterns of shrubs plants in revegetation projects in arid desert areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腾格里沙漠东南部人工固沙区不同恢复年限灌木的分布格局
人工植被中的植物密度和空间分布在种植阶段明显初始化。植物动态和空间模式可能会随着时间的推移而变化,这是个体植物和栖息地之间相互作用的结果,但它是否适用于人工固沙区的沙漠灌木仍然未知。在这里,我们研究了三种灌木(Artemisia ordosica Krasch、Caragana korshinskii Kom和Hedysarum sco‐parium Fisch)在不同地区的植物密度和分布模式的变化,它们分别恢复了27年、32年和50年(R27、R32、R50)。植被分析表明,3个恢复区的优势种为奥氏A.ordosica。从R27到R32,A.or‐dosica和H.scoparium的密度显著增加,然后在R50降低。科尔申斯基的密度在R32和R50较低,在R27较低。方差平均比(VMR)用于表征空间分布模式,以按频率拟合观察到的三种灌木的密度。A.ordosica和C.korshinskii在三个恢复区均表现出显著的聚集分布。H.scopearium在R27和R50中表现出均匀分布,但在R32中表现出聚集分布。这些结果表明,与科尔辛斯基(C.korshinskii)和scoparium相比,奥陶木(A.ordosica)似乎更适合在重新植被的沙漠地区生长。模式分析表明,科尔辛斯基(C.korshinskii)的存活灌木比例较低,随后被占主导地位的奥氏a.ordosica所取代。本研究有助于了解干旱沙漠地区植被重建项目中灌木植物的分布模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions
Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
854
期刊最新文献
Application of geodetector in sensitivity analysis of reference crop evapotranspiration spatial changes in Northwest China The driving force of water resource stress change based on the STIRPAT model: take Zhangye City as a case study Ecophysiological responses to drought stress in Populus euphratica Progress, problems and prospects of palynology in reconstructing environmental change in inland arid areas of Asia 10Be exposure ages of Quaternary Glaciers in Antarctica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1