{"title":"Semikarakory: The Tower on the North Wall and a Relative Chronology of the Lower Don Khazar Forts","authors":"Valerii S. Flërov","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2018.1513294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the synchronicity of the existence and destruction of the Semikarakory and Right-bank Tsimliansk Khazar forts. Evidence includes: the complete congruity of the two-chambered constructions with furnaces in both forts; the use of the same type of tile; the overall destruction of the two forts, reflected in interments of children and women who had perished. The forts were destroyed no later than the 830s–840s. Dating is based on materials of the Right-bank fort. Comparisons with the Sarkel archeological site are relevant: at Sarkel, the tile is different and it is negligible. Construction of fired brick appears on the Lower Don for the first time at the Semikarakory fort, but not at Sarkel. Although previously suggested, our excavations at Semikarakory fort indicate that the historical figure Petrona Kamatir [Petronas Kamateros] was not the initiator of brick fortification on the Lower Don. But was the Semikarakory fort the earliest? The entire left bank of the Lower Don is in need of more thorough research.","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611959.2018.1513294","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2018.1513294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article examines the synchronicity of the existence and destruction of the Semikarakory and Right-bank Tsimliansk Khazar forts. Evidence includes: the complete congruity of the two-chambered constructions with furnaces in both forts; the use of the same type of tile; the overall destruction of the two forts, reflected in interments of children and women who had perished. The forts were destroyed no later than the 830s–840s. Dating is based on materials of the Right-bank fort. Comparisons with the Sarkel archeological site are relevant: at Sarkel, the tile is different and it is negligible. Construction of fired brick appears on the Lower Don for the first time at the Semikarakory fort, but not at Sarkel. Although previously suggested, our excavations at Semikarakory fort indicate that the historical figure Petrona Kamatir [Petronas Kamateros] was not the initiator of brick fortification on the Lower Don. But was the Semikarakory fort the earliest? The entire left bank of the Lower Don is in need of more thorough research.
期刊介绍:
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia presents scholarship from Russia, Siberia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, the vast region that stretches from the Baltic to the Black Sea and from Lake Baikal to the Bering Strait. Each thematic issue, with a substantive introduction to the topic by the editor, features expertly translated and annotated manuscripts, articles, and book excerpts reporting fieldwork from every part of the region and theoretical studies on topics of special interest.