Comparing the effects of education through compact disk and social media on knowledge and practice regarding the assessment of preterm infant behavior among nurses in neonatal intensive care units

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING Nursing and Midwifery Studies Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.4103/nms.nms_10_20
L. Valizadeh, Mohammad Jaffar Abadi, Parvaneh Jari, Parstoo Jalili
{"title":"Comparing the effects of education through compact disk and social media on knowledge and practice regarding the assessment of preterm infant behavior among nurses in neonatal intensive care units","authors":"L. Valizadeh, Mohammad Jaffar Abadi, Parvaneh Jari, Parstoo Jalili","doi":"10.4103/nms.nms_10_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nurses in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) need adequate professional knowledge and skills for providing quality developmental care to premature newborns. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of education through compact disk (CD) and social media (SM) on knowledge and practice regarding the assessment of preterm infant behavior (APIB) among nurses in NICUs. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on fifty NICU nurses. They were randomly allocated to a CD and a SM group. The intervention for both the groups was the same and consisted of education about APIB. Participants' APIB-related knowledge and practice were assessed before and after the intervention using a researcher-made knowledge questionnaire and the APIB checklist, respectively. Data were analyzed through the Chi-square, the independent-samples t, and the paired-samples t-tests as well as the analysis of covariance. Results: The pretest mean scores of knowledge and practice were, respectively, 9.72 ± 4.95 and 207.64 ± 109.49 in the SM group and 9.16 ± 5.94 and 209.88 ± 110.46 in the CD group. After the study intervention, these values significantly increased to 14.80 ± 1.80 and 361.96 ± 38.24 in the SM group (P < 0.05) and 12.46 ± 2.10 and 295.44 ± 53.30 in the CD group (P < 0.05). Although there were no significant differences between the groups regarding the pretest mean scores of knowledge and practice (P > 0.05), the posttest mean scores of knowledge and practice in the SM group were significantly greater than the CD group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: SM-based education is more effective than CD-based education in improving APIB-related knowledge and practice among NICU nurses.","PeriodicalId":45398,"journal":{"name":"Nursing and Midwifery Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing and Midwifery Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_10_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nurses in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) need adequate professional knowledge and skills for providing quality developmental care to premature newborns. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of education through compact disk (CD) and social media (SM) on knowledge and practice regarding the assessment of preterm infant behavior (APIB) among nurses in NICUs. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on fifty NICU nurses. They were randomly allocated to a CD and a SM group. The intervention for both the groups was the same and consisted of education about APIB. Participants' APIB-related knowledge and practice were assessed before and after the intervention using a researcher-made knowledge questionnaire and the APIB checklist, respectively. Data were analyzed through the Chi-square, the independent-samples t, and the paired-samples t-tests as well as the analysis of covariance. Results: The pretest mean scores of knowledge and practice were, respectively, 9.72 ± 4.95 and 207.64 ± 109.49 in the SM group and 9.16 ± 5.94 and 209.88 ± 110.46 in the CD group. After the study intervention, these values significantly increased to 14.80 ± 1.80 and 361.96 ± 38.24 in the SM group (P < 0.05) and 12.46 ± 2.10 and 295.44 ± 53.30 in the CD group (P < 0.05). Although there were no significant differences between the groups regarding the pretest mean scores of knowledge and practice (P > 0.05), the posttest mean scores of knowledge and practice in the SM group were significantly greater than the CD group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: SM-based education is more effective than CD-based education in improving APIB-related knowledge and practice among NICU nurses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较光盘教育和社交媒体教育对新生儿重症监护病房护士早产儿行为评估知识和实践的影响
背景:新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)的护士需要足够的专业知识和技能来为早产儿提供高质量的发育护理。目的:本研究旨在比较CD教育和社交媒体教育对新生儿重症监护病房护士早产儿行为评估知识和实践的影响。方法:对50名新生儿重症监护病房护士进行准实验研究。他们被随机分为CD组和SM组。两组的干预措施相同,包括APIB教育。在干预前和干预后分别使用研究者制作的知识问卷和APIB检查表对参与者的APIB相关知识和实践进行评估。通过卡方检验、独立样本t检验和成对样本t检验以及协方差分析对数据进行分析。结果:SM组知识和实践前测均分分别为9.72±4.95分和207.64±109.49分;CD组知识和实践前测均分分别为9.16±5.94分和209.88±110.46分。研究干预后,SM组为14.80±1.80、361.96±38.24 (P < 0.05), CD组为12.46±2.10、295.44±53.30 (P < 0.05)。两组间知识和实践的前测均分差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05),但SM组知识和实践的后测均分显著高于CD组(P < 0.05)。结论:在提高新生儿重症监护病房护士apib相关知识和实践方面,sm教育比cd教育更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived stress and social support in pregnant women during the COVID-19 Pandemic Physical resilience and its related factors in Iranian older adults with ischemic heart disease: A cross-sectional study Psychological well-being and coping strategies of midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A qualitative study The Effects of Nigella sativa and curcumin supplementation on oxidative stress biomarkers in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis or osteopenia: A triple-blind factorial randomized controlled trial Effects of ambulation during the first stage of labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1