Harmful Practices: An Obstacle in the Realisation of Women’s Rights in Tanzania

N. Msuya
{"title":"Harmful Practices: An Obstacle in the Realisation of Women’s Rights in Tanzania","authors":"N. Msuya","doi":"10.25159/2522-3062/7284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers harmful practices in Tanzania that violate women’s rights. Most provisions of international human rights treaties that focus primarily on women in Tanzania have not been adequately incorporated into national legislation. Efforts to implement such international treaties are often met with suspicion or hostility from the communities owing to a prevalent patriarchal system and its accompanying customs. Women are systematically being denied their rights to autonomy, health and education with the excuse of ‘harmful practices.’ Although the universality of human rights norms and the right to enjoy one’s own culture and respect for cultural diversity have been challenged, it is undeniable that, whenever a state enters into an agreement with the intention of being governed by international law, that state has a legal obligation to comply with such international law or treaty. This article seeks to explore aspects of existing cultural practices and traditions that need to be abolished to conform to the provisions of international law. It is argued that traditional and cultural practices should adhere to the values of equality and women’s rights and that a strong legal framework is essential for addressing harmful practices.","PeriodicalId":29899,"journal":{"name":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/7284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers harmful practices in Tanzania that violate women’s rights. Most provisions of international human rights treaties that focus primarily on women in Tanzania have not been adequately incorporated into national legislation. Efforts to implement such international treaties are often met with suspicion or hostility from the communities owing to a prevalent patriarchal system and its accompanying customs. Women are systematically being denied their rights to autonomy, health and education with the excuse of ‘harmful practices.’ Although the universality of human rights norms and the right to enjoy one’s own culture and respect for cultural diversity have been challenged, it is undeniable that, whenever a state enters into an agreement with the intention of being governed by international law, that state has a legal obligation to comply with such international law or treaty. This article seeks to explore aspects of existing cultural practices and traditions that need to be abolished to conform to the provisions of international law. It is argued that traditional and cultural practices should adhere to the values of equality and women’s rights and that a strong legal framework is essential for addressing harmful practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有害做法:坦桑尼亚实现妇女权利的障碍
这篇文章讨论了坦桑尼亚侵犯妇女权利的有害做法。主要以坦桑尼亚妇女为重点的国际人权条约的大多数规定尚未充分纳入国家立法。由于普遍存在的宗法制度及其伴随的习俗,执行这些国际条约的努力经常受到社区的怀疑或敌意。以“有害做法”为借口,有系统地剥夺了妇女的自主权、健康权和受教育权。“尽管人权准则的普遍性以及享受本国文化和尊重文化多样性的权利受到了挑战,但不可否认的是,每当一个国家以受国际法管辖为目的签订协议时,该国就有遵守此类国际法或条约的法律义务。本文旨在探讨为符合国际法的规定而需要废除的现有文化习俗和传统的各个方面。有人认为,传统和文化习俗应坚持平等和妇女权利的价值观,强有力的法律框架对于解决有害习俗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Corporate Social Responsibility as an Enabler of Socio-economic Restoration in Post-COVID-19 Business Environment in South Africa and Nigeria International Law’s Specialised Regime and Normative Conflict: A Reflection on International Criminal Law Accommodating New Modes of Work in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in Ghana: Some Comparative Lessons from the United Kingdom and South Africa A Flexible Approach to Enabling the Free Movement of People in Southern Africa Evaluating the Individual Criminal Responsibility of Gukurahundi Perpetrators under International Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1