Repeat Users of Chat Reference: An Exploratory Study

Q2 Social Sciences Reference Librarian Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02763877.2021.1986875
David A. Hurley
{"title":"Repeat Users of Chat Reference: An Exploratory Study","authors":"David A. Hurley","doi":"10.1080/02763877.2021.1986875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Libraries have long used patrons’ willingness to return as a metric for assessing reference services, but have not measured actual return rates for this service. Knowing if our user base is a small number of highly engaged patrons, or many patrons who visit only once, has implications for service improvements, marketing, and assessment. This study establishes 28% as the baseline return rate for chat reference at one research university, with 62% of all sessions coming from repeat users. Predictors of whether a patron would return after their first session are affiliation (e.g., whether they are faculty, graduate student, undergraduate, staff, or not affiliated with the university), the duration of the session, and where on the library website the chat was initiated. The librarian assisting, wait time, and the patron’s own rating of the chat are among the factors that are not predictive. Further research into why patrons do or do not return, and what constitutes a good return rate, is recommended.","PeriodicalId":35386,"journal":{"name":"Reference Librarian","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reference Librarian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2021.1986875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Libraries have long used patrons’ willingness to return as a metric for assessing reference services, but have not measured actual return rates for this service. Knowing if our user base is a small number of highly engaged patrons, or many patrons who visit only once, has implications for service improvements, marketing, and assessment. This study establishes 28% as the baseline return rate for chat reference at one research university, with 62% of all sessions coming from repeat users. Predictors of whether a patron would return after their first session are affiliation (e.g., whether they are faculty, graduate student, undergraduate, staff, or not affiliated with the university), the duration of the session, and where on the library website the chat was initiated. The librarian assisting, wait time, and the patron’s own rating of the chat are among the factors that are not predictive. Further research into why patrons do or do not return, and what constitutes a good return rate, is recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聊天参考的重复用户:一项探索性研究
长期以来,图书馆一直将读者的回访意愿作为评估参考咨询服务的指标,但并没有衡量这种服务的实际回访率。了解我们的用户群是少数高度参与的顾客,还是许多只访问一次的顾客,对服务改进、营销和评估都有意义。该研究在一所研究型大学建立了28%的聊天参考基准回报率,其中62%的会话来自重复用户。预测用户是否会在第一次会话后返回的因素是从属关系(例如,他们是教师、研究生、本科生、职员还是不属于大学)、会话的持续时间以及聊天是在图书馆网站上发起的。图书管理员的协助、等待时间和读者自己对聊天的评价都是不可预测的因素。建议进一步研究顾客为什么会或不会回来,以及什么构成了良好的回头率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reference Librarian
Reference Librarian Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The Reference Librarian aims to be a standard resource for everyone interested in the practice of reference work, from library and information science students to practicing reference librarians and full-time researchers. It enables readers to keep up with the changing face of reference, presenting new ideas for consideration. The Reference Librarian publishes articles about all aspects of the reference process, some research-based and some applied. Current trends and traditional questions are equally welcome. Many articles concern new electronic tools and resources, best practices in instruction and reference service, analysis of marketing of services, and effectiveness studies.
期刊最新文献
PAUSE for Your Health: A New End-User Tool for Evaluating Consumer Health News and Online Resources The Future of Libraries Did Not Happen–But Don’t Let History Repeat Itself At What Cost? : Missouri Librarians and the Struggle for Intellectual Freedom Robots and Human Librarians for Delivering Library Services to Patrons Improving a Library FAQ: Assessment and Reflection of the First Year’s Use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1