Kulturní a právní aspekty příčin a dopadů teze o technologické stagnaci

Q4 Social Sciences Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI:10.14712/23366478.2023.3
Jan Hořeňovský
{"title":"Kulturní a právní aspekty příčin a dopadů teze o technologické stagnaci","authors":"Jan Hořeňovský","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dominant narrative that prevails in Western society today is that we live in a time of unprecedented technological progress that is historically unparalleled. We have social media networks, smartphones, the internet, and we are moving towards advanced artificial intelligence. However, little is said or written about the fact that this is also a narrative successfully challenged by several prominent, mainly American, authors. Those point out that progress over the last 50 years or so has been limited mainly to information technology, while in other areas, such as energy, transport, and construction, we are experiencing stagnation, resulting in the decline of the middle class and worsening life prospects, particularly for young people. This article is based on these critical perspectives and has two objectives. The first is to introduce a reader to the technological stagnation thesis. The second is to analyse the causes of this phenomenon and what role law and regulation might play in it. The ambition of this article is not to solve this problem entirely but rather to bring it to the attention of the academic community. If future discussions will be more about the impact of our actions on the issue of innovation, I would consider the objective of this article to be met. At the same time, I believe that this article may open the door to further research in the field of law, including potential empirical analysis.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dominant narrative that prevails in Western society today is that we live in a time of unprecedented technological progress that is historically unparalleled. We have social media networks, smartphones, the internet, and we are moving towards advanced artificial intelligence. However, little is said or written about the fact that this is also a narrative successfully challenged by several prominent, mainly American, authors. Those point out that progress over the last 50 years or so has been limited mainly to information technology, while in other areas, such as energy, transport, and construction, we are experiencing stagnation, resulting in the decline of the middle class and worsening life prospects, particularly for young people. This article is based on these critical perspectives and has two objectives. The first is to introduce a reader to the technological stagnation thesis. The second is to analyse the causes of this phenomenon and what role law and regulation might play in it. The ambition of this article is not to solve this problem entirely but rather to bring it to the attention of the academic community. If future discussions will be more about the impact of our actions on the issue of innovation, I would consider the objective of this article to be met. At the same time, I believe that this article may open the door to further research in the field of law, including potential empirical analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化和法律方面的原因和影响的论文技术停滞
当今西方社会盛行的主流说法是,我们生活在一个前所未有的技术进步时代,这在历史上是无与伦比的。我们有社交媒体网络、智能手机、互联网,我们正在向先进的人工智能迈进。然而,很少有人说过或写过这样一个事实,即这也是几位杰出作家(主要是美国作家)成功挑战的叙述。他们指出,过去50年左右的进步主要局限于信息技术,而在能源、交通和建筑等其他领域,我们正在经历停滞,导致中产阶级的减少和生活前景的恶化,特别是对年轻人来说。本文基于这些批判性观点,有两个目标。第一部分是向读者介绍技术停滞理论。二是分析造成这一现象的原因,以及法律法规在其中可能发挥的作用。本文的目的不是要完全解决这个问题,而是要引起学术界的注意。如果未来的讨论更多地是关于我们的行动对创新问题的影响,我认为这篇文章的目标是可以实现的。同时,我相信本文可能为法学领域的进一步研究打开大门,包括潜在的实证分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Z vědeckého života: zpráva z mezinárodní vědecké konference Opravné systémy a opravné prostředky v trestním řízení Koncept kontradiktornosti v trestním řízení Problematické aspekty základních zásad v návrhu rekodifikace trestního procesu Využitelnost dohody o vině a trestu a prohlášení viny v jednotlivých stadiích trestního řízení Zajištění informací a věcí v návrhu nového trestního řádu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1