User elicited gesture-based locomotion techniques for immersive VEs in a seated position: a comparative evaluation

IF 3.2 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Frontiers in virtual reality Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.3389/frvir.2023.1169654
P. Ganapathi, K. Sorathia
{"title":"User elicited gesture-based locomotion techniques for immersive VEs in a seated position: a comparative evaluation","authors":"P. Ganapathi, K. Sorathia","doi":"10.3389/frvir.2023.1169654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Locomotion is a fundamental task for exploring and interacting in virtual environments (VEs), and numerous locomotion techniques have been developed to improve the perceived realism and efficiency of movement in VEs. Gesture-based locomotion techniques have emerged as a more natural and intuitive mode of interaction than controller-based methods of travel in VEs. In this paper, we investigate the intuitiveness, comfort, ease of use, performance, presence, simulation sickness, and user preference of three user-elicited body-based gestures: the Calling gesture, Deictic Pointing gesture, and Mirror Leaning gesture. These gestures are intended to be used in three different seated multitasking scenarios involving virtual travel and various levels of hand engagement in selection. In the first study, participants compared the Calling gesture with the Tapping and Teleportation gestures for Scenario 1, which involved virtual travel only. The Calling gesture was found to be the most intuitive, with increased presence, while the Teleportation gesture was the preferred travel technique. The second study involved participants comparing the Deictic Pointing gesture with the Tapping and Teleportation gestures for Scenario 2, which involved virtual travel and one hand engaged in selection. The Deictic Pointing gesture was found to be more intuitive than the other gestures in terms of performance, comfort, ease of use, and presence. The third study introduced a new group of participants who compared the Mirror Leaning gesture with the Tapping and Teleportation gestures for Scenario 3, which involved virtual travel and both hands engaged in selection. The Mirror Leaning gesture was found to be the most intuitive, with increased presence and performance compared to the other gestures. We compared the gestures of the scenarios in three complementary search tasks: traveling in a straight-line path, moving in a directed path, and moving in an undirected path. We believe that the qualitative and quantitative measures obtained from our studies will help researchers and interaction design experts to design efficient and effective gesture-based locomotion techniques for traveling in a seated position in multitasking VEs.","PeriodicalId":73116,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in virtual reality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in virtual reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1169654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Locomotion is a fundamental task for exploring and interacting in virtual environments (VEs), and numerous locomotion techniques have been developed to improve the perceived realism and efficiency of movement in VEs. Gesture-based locomotion techniques have emerged as a more natural and intuitive mode of interaction than controller-based methods of travel in VEs. In this paper, we investigate the intuitiveness, comfort, ease of use, performance, presence, simulation sickness, and user preference of three user-elicited body-based gestures: the Calling gesture, Deictic Pointing gesture, and Mirror Leaning gesture. These gestures are intended to be used in three different seated multitasking scenarios involving virtual travel and various levels of hand engagement in selection. In the first study, participants compared the Calling gesture with the Tapping and Teleportation gestures for Scenario 1, which involved virtual travel only. The Calling gesture was found to be the most intuitive, with increased presence, while the Teleportation gesture was the preferred travel technique. The second study involved participants comparing the Deictic Pointing gesture with the Tapping and Teleportation gestures for Scenario 2, which involved virtual travel and one hand engaged in selection. The Deictic Pointing gesture was found to be more intuitive than the other gestures in terms of performance, comfort, ease of use, and presence. The third study introduced a new group of participants who compared the Mirror Leaning gesture with the Tapping and Teleportation gestures for Scenario 3, which involved virtual travel and both hands engaged in selection. The Mirror Leaning gesture was found to be the most intuitive, with increased presence and performance compared to the other gestures. We compared the gestures of the scenarios in three complementary search tasks: traveling in a straight-line path, moving in a directed path, and moving in an undirected path. We believe that the qualitative and quantitative measures obtained from our studies will help researchers and interaction design experts to design efficient and effective gesture-based locomotion techniques for traveling in a seated position in multitasking VEs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于用户手势的坐姿沉浸式视觉运动技术的比较评价
运动是在虚拟环境中探索和交互的一项基本任务,已经开发了许多运动技术来提高虚拟环境中运动的感知真实性和效率。与基于控制器的VEs旅行方法相比,基于手势的运动技术已经成为一种更自然、更直观的互动模式。在本文中,我们研究了三种用户引发的基于身体的手势的直观性、舒适性、易用性、性能、存在性、模拟病态和用户偏好:呼叫手势、指示指向手势和靠镜手势。这些手势旨在用于三种不同的坐姿多任务场景,包括虚拟旅行和不同级别的手参与选择。在第一项研究中,参与者将场景1中的“呼叫”手势与“轻敲”和“传送”手势进行了比较,场景1仅涉及虚拟旅行。呼叫手势被发现是最直观的,存在感更强,而远程传送手势是首选的旅行技巧。第二项研究涉及参与者将场景2的指示手势与轻拍和传送手势进行比较,场景2涉及虚拟旅行和一只手参与选择。在性能、舒适度、易用性和在场性方面,指示手势比其他手势更直观。第三项研究引入了一组新的参与者,他们将场景3中的“倚镜”手势与“轻拍”和“传送”手势进行了比较,场景3涉及虚拟旅行和双手参与选择。“倚镜”手势被认为是最直观的,与其他手势相比,它的存在感和性能都有所提高。我们比较了三个互补搜索任务中场景的手势:沿直线路径行进、沿有向路径移动和沿无向路径移动。我们相信,从我们的研究中获得的定性和定量测量将有助于研究人员和交互设计专家设计高效、有效的基于手势的移动技术,用于在多任务视觉中以坐姿行进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experiential disparities in social VR: uncovering power dynamics and inequality Predictive multiuser redirected walking using artificial potential fields Synergy and medial effects of multimodal cueing with auditory and electrostatic force stimuli on visual field guidance in 360° VR Virtual reality training for intraoperative imaging in orthopaedic surgery: an overview of current progress and future direction Editorial: Virtual agents in virtual reality: design and implications for VR users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1