Transnational Relations and Activism in International Relations: Debates and Consensus in Literature

A. Soetjipto, A. Yuliestiana
{"title":"Transnational Relations and Activism in International Relations: Debates and Consensus in Literature","authors":"A. Soetjipto, A. Yuliestiana","doi":"10.7454/global.v22i1.479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the concepts of transnational relations and activism in the study of International Relations, specifically the role of civil society in transnational advocacy. It is fascinating to discuss the role of civil society when state actors are no longer the most prominent actors in International Relations studies in the midst of globalisation. Some articles related to transnational relations have been written by the scholars of International Relations such as Thomas Risse-Kappen (1995). Even so, one of the most sophisticated concepts of transnational activism was introduced by Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink (1998), in Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. In order to fully understand transnational activism in the study of International Relations, a divergent perspective can be applied. In this article, the authors aim to examine the recent debates and its counternarratives in International Relations through critical and constructivism lenses. Firstly, this article would describe the concepts of transnationalism and transnational activism in the study of International Relations (state of the art). Secondly, it would be a discussion in the literature on transnationalism and transnational activism which cover themes about norm diffusion, the ‘boomerang pattern’, political opportunity structures and accountability and effectiveness. The last part is conclusion that can be drawn from this consensus and debates in the concept of transnational activism.","PeriodicalId":32472,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v22i1.479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article explores the concepts of transnational relations and activism in the study of International Relations, specifically the role of civil society in transnational advocacy. It is fascinating to discuss the role of civil society when state actors are no longer the most prominent actors in International Relations studies in the midst of globalisation. Some articles related to transnational relations have been written by the scholars of International Relations such as Thomas Risse-Kappen (1995). Even so, one of the most sophisticated concepts of transnational activism was introduced by Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink (1998), in Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. In order to fully understand transnational activism in the study of International Relations, a divergent perspective can be applied. In this article, the authors aim to examine the recent debates and its counternarratives in International Relations through critical and constructivism lenses. Firstly, this article would describe the concepts of transnationalism and transnational activism in the study of International Relations (state of the art). Secondly, it would be a discussion in the literature on transnationalism and transnational activism which cover themes about norm diffusion, the ‘boomerang pattern’, political opportunity structures and accountability and effectiveness. The last part is conclusion that can be drawn from this consensus and debates in the concept of transnational activism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨国关系与国际关系中的激进主义:文学中的争论与共识
本文探讨了国际关系研究中的跨国关系和激进主义概念,特别是民间社会在跨国宣传中的作用。当国家行动者不再是全球化背景下国际关系研究中最突出的行动者时,讨论民间社会的作用是很有趣的。托马斯·里斯·卡彭(Thomas Risse Kappen,1995)等国际关系学者撰写了一些与跨国关系有关的文章。即便如此,Margaret Keck和Kathryn Sikink(1998)在《超越国界的活动家:国际政治中的倡导网络》一书中提出了跨国激进主义最复杂的概念之一。为了充分理解国际关系研究中的跨国激进主义,可以采用不同的视角。在这篇文章中,作者旨在通过批判性和建构主义的视角来审视国际关系中最近的辩论及其反叙事。本文首先介绍了国际关系研究中的跨国主义和跨国激进主义的概念。其次,这将是关于跨国主义和跨国激进主义的文献讨论,涵盖规范扩散、“回旋镖模式”、政治机会结构以及问责制和有效性等主题。最后一部分是从跨国激进主义概念的共识和争论中得出的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
TURNING UBUD INTO UNWTO'S PROTOTYPE FOR A WORLD GASTRONOMIC DESTINATION THROUGH GASTRODIPLOMACY ASEAN’S ROLE IN THE REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP) FORMATION TO ENHANCE REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION A CONSTRUCTIVIST ANALYSIS OF CHINA’S GEOPOLITICAL ECONOMIC STRATEGY TOWARD AFRICA: A CASE OF SINO-TANZANIAN SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION MIDDLE POWER AND SYMBOLIC POWER IN CLIMATE CHANGE NEGOTIATIONS: THE CASE OF INDONESIA’S STRATEGY IN THE KATOWICE CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE FROM RIVALS TO PARTNERS: THE EVOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION AMONG CHINA, JAPAN, AND KOREA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1