Strategy use in a spoken dialog system–delivered paired discussion task: A stimulated recall study

IF 2.2 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Testing Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1177/02655322231152620
Nazlinur Gokturk, E. Chukharev-Hudilainen
{"title":"Strategy use in a spoken dialog system–delivered paired discussion task: A stimulated recall study","authors":"Nazlinur Gokturk, E. Chukharev-Hudilainen","doi":"10.1177/02655322231152620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With recent technological advances, researchers have begun to explore the potential use of spoken dialog systems (SDSs) for L2 oral communication assessment. While several studies support the feasibility of building these systems for various types of oral tasks, research on the construct validity of SDS-delivered tasks is still limited. Thus, this study examines the cognitive processes engaged by an SDS-delivered paired discussion task, focusing on strategic competence, an essential component of L2 oral communication ability. Thirty adult test-takers completed a paired discussion task with an SDS acting as an interlocutor and provided stimulated recalls about their strategy use in the task. Three trained raters independently evaluated the test-takers’ oral task responses using a holistic rating scale devised for the task. Findings revealed the use of six categories of construct-relevant strategies during task performance. While no statistically significant differences were found in the use of these categories between high- and low-ability test-takers, marked differences were observed in the use of individual strategies within the categories between the test-takers at the two levels. These findings provide insight into how test-takers at different ability levels cognitively interact with SDS-delivered paired discussion tasks and offer implications for the design and validation of such tasks.","PeriodicalId":17928,"journal":{"name":"Language Testing","volume":"40 1","pages":"630 - 657"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Testing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231152620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With recent technological advances, researchers have begun to explore the potential use of spoken dialog systems (SDSs) for L2 oral communication assessment. While several studies support the feasibility of building these systems for various types of oral tasks, research on the construct validity of SDS-delivered tasks is still limited. Thus, this study examines the cognitive processes engaged by an SDS-delivered paired discussion task, focusing on strategic competence, an essential component of L2 oral communication ability. Thirty adult test-takers completed a paired discussion task with an SDS acting as an interlocutor and provided stimulated recalls about their strategy use in the task. Three trained raters independently evaluated the test-takers’ oral task responses using a holistic rating scale devised for the task. Findings revealed the use of six categories of construct-relevant strategies during task performance. While no statistically significant differences were found in the use of these categories between high- and low-ability test-takers, marked differences were observed in the use of individual strategies within the categories between the test-takers at the two levels. These findings provide insight into how test-takers at different ability levels cognitively interact with SDS-delivered paired discussion tasks and offer implications for the design and validation of such tasks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在口语对话系统提供的配对讨论任务中的策略使用:刺激回忆研究
随着最近的技术进步,研究人员已经开始探索口语对话系统(SDS)在二语口语交际评估中的潜在用途。虽然一些研究支持为各种类型的口头任务构建这些系统的可行性,但对SDS交付任务的结构有效性的研究仍然有限。因此,本研究考察了SDS提供的配对讨论任务所涉及的认知过程,重点关注策略能力,这是二语口语交际能力的重要组成部分。30名成年考生完成了一项由SDS作为对话者的配对讨论任务,并对他们在任务中的策略使用进行了刺激性回忆。三名经过培训的评分员使用为任务设计的整体评分量表独立评估了考生的口头任务反应。研究结果显示,在任务执行过程中使用了六类结构相关策略。虽然高能力和低能力考生在使用这些类别方面没有发现统计学上的显著差异,但在两个级别的考生之间,在使用类别内的个人策略方面观察到了显著差异。这些发现深入了解了不同能力水平的考生如何与SDS提供的配对讨论任务进行认知互动,并为这些任务的设计和验证提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Testing
Language Testing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Language Testing is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language testing and assessment. It provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and information between people working in the fields of first and second language testing and assessment. This includes researchers and practitioners in EFL and ESL testing, and assessment in child language acquisition and language pathology. In addition, special attention is focused on issues of testing theory, experimental investigations, and the following up of practical implications.
期刊最新文献
Can language test providers do more to support open science? A response to Winke Considerations to promote and accelerate Open Science: A response to Winke Evaluating the impact of nonverbal behavior on language ability ratings Sharing, collaborating, and building trust: How Open Science advances language testing Open Science in language assessment research contexts: A reply to Winke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1