Economic potential of milk production strategies with restrictive use of concentrated feed—An experiment on 36 family farms in the pre-alpine region

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Grassland Science Pub Date : 2021-07-21 DOI:10.1111/grs.12325
Christian Gazzarin, Bruno Häller, Pius Hofstetter
{"title":"Economic potential of milk production strategies with restrictive use of concentrated feed—An experiment on 36 family farms in the pre-alpine region","authors":"Christian Gazzarin,&nbsp;Bruno Häller,&nbsp;Pius Hofstetter","doi":"10.1111/grs.12325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study was to quantify the economic potential of grass-based milk production strategies with limited use of concentrated feed in the pre-alpine region. We monitored 36 family dairy farms from the pre-alpine region of Switzerland divided in three study groups following one of three defined, voluntarily adopted production strategies: Partial grazing and barn feeding with freshly cut forages, supplementing &lt;500 kg (GBF) and 1,200 kg (GBFplus) of concentrated feed, respectively, and practicing full grazing (FG), supplementing &lt;100 kg of concentrated feed per cow per year. For three years (2014–2016), data were collected on the farms, and experience and ideas were exchanged and evaluated in a participatory process together with local extension services and researchers. Economic success indicators such as cost price and return to labor from each study group were compared with structurally similar control groups derived from the Swiss Farm Accountancy Data Network after completing an interactive standardization process, which largely balanced farm-specific features in the study groups. Compared with the control groups, the cost price (Swiss francs [CHF] per 100 kg milk) of GBF, GBFplus, and FG was significantly reduced by 20%, 20%, and 26%, respectively. Return to labor (CHF per hour) was significantly higher than in the control group for GBF (20.60 versus. 13.80), GBFplus (19.70 versus. 10.20), and FG (29.30 versus. 19.20). The comparison between the study groups also showed that lower milk revenues due to a lower use of concentrate could be economically compensated by a better input efficiency. A consistent implementation of the production strategy as well as personal qualities in terms of cost management seems to play a decisive role.</p>","PeriodicalId":56078,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Science","volume":"67 4","pages":"343-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/grs.12325","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.12325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this study was to quantify the economic potential of grass-based milk production strategies with limited use of concentrated feed in the pre-alpine region. We monitored 36 family dairy farms from the pre-alpine region of Switzerland divided in three study groups following one of three defined, voluntarily adopted production strategies: Partial grazing and barn feeding with freshly cut forages, supplementing <500 kg (GBF) and 1,200 kg (GBFplus) of concentrated feed, respectively, and practicing full grazing (FG), supplementing <100 kg of concentrated feed per cow per year. For three years (2014–2016), data were collected on the farms, and experience and ideas were exchanged and evaluated in a participatory process together with local extension services and researchers. Economic success indicators such as cost price and return to labor from each study group were compared with structurally similar control groups derived from the Swiss Farm Accountancy Data Network after completing an interactive standardization process, which largely balanced farm-specific features in the study groups. Compared with the control groups, the cost price (Swiss francs [CHF] per 100 kg milk) of GBF, GBFplus, and FG was significantly reduced by 20%, 20%, and 26%, respectively. Return to labor (CHF per hour) was significantly higher than in the control group for GBF (20.60 versus. 13.80), GBFplus (19.70 versus. 10.20), and FG (29.30 versus. 19.20). The comparison between the study groups also showed that lower milk revenues due to a lower use of concentrate could be economically compensated by a better input efficiency. A consistent implementation of the production strategy as well as personal qualities in terms of cost management seems to play a decisive role.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
限制使用浓缩饲料的牛奶生产策略的经济潜力——在前高山地区36个家庭农场的试验
本研究的目的是量化高山前地区有限使用浓缩饲料的草基奶生产战略的经济潜力。我们对来自瑞士前高山地区的36个家庭奶牛场进行了监测,将其分为三个研究组,遵循三种明确的、自愿采用的生产策略之一:部分放牧和用新割的饲料饲喂谷仓,分别补充500公斤(GBF)和1200公斤(GBF +)的浓缩饲料,以及实行完全放牧(FG),每头奶牛每年补充100公斤浓缩饲料。为期三年(2014-2016年),在农场收集数据,与当地推广服务机构和研究人员一起,在参与式过程中交流和评估经验和想法。在完成交互式标准化过程后,将每个研究组的经济成功指标(如成本价格和劳动力回报)与来自瑞士农场会计数据网络的结构相似的对照组进行比较,该过程在很大程度上平衡了研究组的农场特征。与对照组相比,GBF、GBF +和FG的成本价(每100 kg牛奶瑞士法郎)分别显著降低20%、20%和26%。GBF的返回劳动时间(每小时瑞士法郎)明显高于对照组(20.60瑞士法郎对每小时瑞士法郎)。13.80), GBFplus(19.70对。10.20), FG (29.30 vs。19.20)。研究小组之间的比较还表明,由于精料使用减少而导致的牛奶收入减少可以通过更好的投入效率在经济上得到补偿。在成本管理方面,始终如一地执行生产战略和个人素质似乎起着决定性的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Grassland Science
Grassland Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Grassland Science is the official English language journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science. It publishes original research papers, review articles and short reports in all aspects of grassland science, with an aim of presenting and sharing knowledge, ideas and philosophies on better management and use of grasslands, forage crops and turf plants for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes across the world. Contributions from anyone, non-members as well as members, are welcome in any of the following fields: grassland environment, landscape, ecology and systems analysis; pasture and lawn establishment, management and cultivation; grassland utilization, animal management, behavior, nutrition and production; forage conservation, processing, storage, utilization and nutritive value; physiology, morphology, pathology and entomology of plants; breeding and genetics; physicochemical property of soil, soil animals and microorganisms and plant nutrition; economics in grassland systems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cattle dung detection in pastures from drone images using YOLOv5 Potassium fertilization and defoliation intensity effects on forage characteristics of “BRS Zuri” guineagrass Phylogenomic identification and overexpression of plant size–related genes in Setaria viridis and rice Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1