Evaluating alcohol intoxication management services: the EDARA mixed-methods study

S. Moore, D. Allen, Yvette Amos, J. Blake, A. Brennan, Penny Buykx, S. Goodacre, L. A. Gray, A. Irving, A. O’Cathain, V. Sivarajasingam, T. Young
{"title":"Evaluating alcohol intoxication management services: the EDARA mixed-methods study","authors":"S. Moore, D. Allen, Yvette Amos, J. Blake, A. Brennan, Penny Buykx, S. Goodacre, L. A. Gray, A. Irving, A. O’Cathain, V. Sivarajasingam, T. Young","doi":"10.3310/hsdr08240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Front-line health-care services are under increased demand when acute alcohol intoxication is most common, which is in night-time environments. Cities have implemented alcohol intoxication management services to divert the intoxicated away from emergency care.\n \n \n \n To evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability to patients and staff of alcohol intoxication management services and undertake an ethnographic study capturing front-line staff’s views on the impact of acute alcohol intoxication on their professional lives.\n \n \n \n This was a controlled mixed-methods longitudinal observational study with an ethnographic evaluation in parallel. Six cities with alcohol intoxication management services were compared with six matched control cities to determine effects on key performance indicators (e.g. number of patients in the emergency department and ambulance response times). Surveys captured the impact of alcohol intoxication management services on the quality of care for patients in six alcohol intoxication management services, six emergency departments with local alcohol intoxication management services and six emergency departments without local alcohol intoxication management services. The ethnographic study considered front-line staff perceptions in two cities with alcohol intoxication management services and one city without alcohol intoxication management services.\n \n \n \n Alcohol intoxication management services typically operated in cities in which the incidence of acute alcohol intoxication was greatest. The per-session average number of attendances across all alcohol intoxication management services was low (mean 7.3, average minimum 2.8, average maximum 11.8) compared with the average number of emergency department attendances per alcohol intoxication management services session (mean 78.8), and the number of patients diverted away from emergency departments, per session, required for services to be considered cost-neutral was 8.7, falling to 3.5 when ambulance costs were included. Alcohol intoxication management services varied, from volunteer-led first aid to more clinically focused nurse practitioner services, with only the latter providing evidence for diversion from emergency departments. Qualitative and ethnographic data indicated that alcohol intoxication management services are acceptable to practitioners and patients and that they address unmet need. There was evidence that alcohol intoxication management services improve ambulance response times and reduce emergency department attendance. Effects are uncertain owing to the variation in service delivery.\n \n \n \n The evaluation focused on health service outcomes, yet evidence arose suggesting that alcohol intoxication management services provide broader societal benefits. There was no nationally agreed standard operating procedure for alcohol intoxication management services, undermining the evaluation. Routine health data outcomes exhibited considerable variance, undermining opportunities to provide an accurate appraisal of the heterogenous collection of alcohol intoxication management services.\n \n \n \n Alcohol intoxication management services are varied, multipartner endeavours and would benefit from agreed national standards. Alcohol intoxication management services are popular with and benefit front-line staff and serve as a hub facilitating partnership working. They are popular with alcohol intoxication management services patients and capture previously unmet need in night-time environments. However, acute alcohol intoxication in emergency departments remains an issue and opportunities for diversion have not been entirely realised. The nurse-led model was the most expensive service evaluated but was also the most likely to divert patients away from emergency departments, suggesting that greater clinical involvement and alignment with emergency departments is necessary. Alcohol intoxication management services should be regarded as fledgling services that require further work to realise benefit.\n \n \n \n Research could be undertaken to determine if a standardised model of alcohol intoxication management services, based on the nurse practitioner model, can be developed and implemented in different settings. Future evaluations should go beyond the health service and consider outcomes more generally, especially for the police. Future work on the management of acute alcohol intoxication in night-time environments could recognise the partnership between health-care, police and ambulance services and third-sector organisations in managing acute alcohol intoxication.\n \n \n \n Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN63096364.\n \n \n \n This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 24. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.\n","PeriodicalId":12880,"journal":{"name":"Health Services and Delivery Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services and Delivery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr08240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Front-line health-care services are under increased demand when acute alcohol intoxication is most common, which is in night-time environments. Cities have implemented alcohol intoxication management services to divert the intoxicated away from emergency care. To evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability to patients and staff of alcohol intoxication management services and undertake an ethnographic study capturing front-line staff’s views on the impact of acute alcohol intoxication on their professional lives. This was a controlled mixed-methods longitudinal observational study with an ethnographic evaluation in parallel. Six cities with alcohol intoxication management services were compared with six matched control cities to determine effects on key performance indicators (e.g. number of patients in the emergency department and ambulance response times). Surveys captured the impact of alcohol intoxication management services on the quality of care for patients in six alcohol intoxication management services, six emergency departments with local alcohol intoxication management services and six emergency departments without local alcohol intoxication management services. The ethnographic study considered front-line staff perceptions in two cities with alcohol intoxication management services and one city without alcohol intoxication management services. Alcohol intoxication management services typically operated in cities in which the incidence of acute alcohol intoxication was greatest. The per-session average number of attendances across all alcohol intoxication management services was low (mean 7.3, average minimum 2.8, average maximum 11.8) compared with the average number of emergency department attendances per alcohol intoxication management services session (mean 78.8), and the number of patients diverted away from emergency departments, per session, required for services to be considered cost-neutral was 8.7, falling to 3.5 when ambulance costs were included. Alcohol intoxication management services varied, from volunteer-led first aid to more clinically focused nurse practitioner services, with only the latter providing evidence for diversion from emergency departments. Qualitative and ethnographic data indicated that alcohol intoxication management services are acceptable to practitioners and patients and that they address unmet need. There was evidence that alcohol intoxication management services improve ambulance response times and reduce emergency department attendance. Effects are uncertain owing to the variation in service delivery. The evaluation focused on health service outcomes, yet evidence arose suggesting that alcohol intoxication management services provide broader societal benefits. There was no nationally agreed standard operating procedure for alcohol intoxication management services, undermining the evaluation. Routine health data outcomes exhibited considerable variance, undermining opportunities to provide an accurate appraisal of the heterogenous collection of alcohol intoxication management services. Alcohol intoxication management services are varied, multipartner endeavours and would benefit from agreed national standards. Alcohol intoxication management services are popular with and benefit front-line staff and serve as a hub facilitating partnership working. They are popular with alcohol intoxication management services patients and capture previously unmet need in night-time environments. However, acute alcohol intoxication in emergency departments remains an issue and opportunities for diversion have not been entirely realised. The nurse-led model was the most expensive service evaluated but was also the most likely to divert patients away from emergency departments, suggesting that greater clinical involvement and alignment with emergency departments is necessary. Alcohol intoxication management services should be regarded as fledgling services that require further work to realise benefit. Research could be undertaken to determine if a standardised model of alcohol intoxication management services, based on the nurse practitioner model, can be developed and implemented in different settings. Future evaluations should go beyond the health service and consider outcomes more generally, especially for the police. Future work on the management of acute alcohol intoxication in night-time environments could recognise the partnership between health-care, police and ambulance services and third-sector organisations in managing acute alcohol intoxication. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN63096364. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 24. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估酒精中毒管理服务:EDARA混合方法研究
在夜间环境中,急性酒精中毒最常见,因此对一线保健服务的需求增加。城市已经实施了酒精中毒管理服务,以转移醉酒的紧急护理。评估酒精中毒管理服务的有效性、成本效益和病人和工作人员的接受程度,并进行一项民族志研究,收集前线工作人员对急性酒精中毒对其职业生涯影响的看法。这是一项对照混合方法纵向观察研究,同时进行人种学评估。将6个提供酒精中毒管理服务的城市与6个匹配的对照城市进行比较,以确定对关键绩效指标(如急诊科患者人数和救护车响应时间)的影响。调查记录了6个酒精中毒管理服务机构、6个设有当地酒精中毒管理服务的急诊科和6个没有当地酒精中毒管理服务的急诊科的酒精中毒管理服务对患者护理质量的影响。民族志研究考虑了两个有酒精中毒管理服务的城市和一个没有酒精中毒管理服务的城市的一线工作人员的看法。酒精中毒管理服务通常在急性酒精中毒发病率最高的城市开展。所有酒精中毒管理服务的平均每次就诊人数较低(平均7.3人,平均最低2.8人,平均最高11.8人),而急诊部门每次酒精中毒管理服务的平均就诊人数(平均78.8人),并且每次从急诊部门转走的患者数量为8.7人,被认为是成本中立的服务,当包括救护车费用时,下降到3.5人。酒精中毒管理服务各不相同,从志愿者主导的急救到更注重临床的执业护士服务,只有后者提供了从急诊室转移的证据。定性和人种学数据表明,从业人员和患者可以接受酒精中毒管理服务,这些服务解决了未满足的需求。有证据表明,酒精中毒管理服务改善了救护车反应时间,减少了急诊室的出勤率。由于提供的服务各不相同,其效果尚不确定。评估侧重于卫生服务成果,但有证据表明,酒精中毒管理服务提供了更广泛的社会效益。没有国家商定的酒精中毒管理服务标准操作程序,影响了评价。常规健康数据结果显示出相当大的差异,破坏了对酒精中毒管理服务的异质性收集进行准确评估的机会。酒精中毒管理服务是多种多样的、多方合作的努力,将受益于商定的国家标准。酒精中毒管理服务广受前线员工欢迎,并令前线员工受惠,是促进伙伴合作的枢纽。它们在酒精中毒管理服务患者中很受欢迎,并满足了夜间环境中以前未满足的需求。然而,急性酒精中毒在急诊科仍然是一个问题,转移的机会还没有完全实现。护士主导模式是评估中最昂贵的服务,但也最有可能将患者从急诊科转移出去,这表明更多的临床参与和与急诊科的协调是必要的。酒精中毒管理服务应被视为刚刚起步的服务,需要进一步努力才能实现效益。可以进行研究,以确定是否可以在不同的环境中开发和实施基于护士执业模式的酒精中毒管理服务的标准化模式。今后的评价应超越保健服务,更广泛地考虑结果,特别是对警察的结果。今后在夜间环境中管理急性酒精中毒的工作可以认识到保健、警察和救护车服务以及第三部门组织在管理急性酒精中毒方面的伙伴关系。当前对照试验ISRCTN63096364。该项目由国家卫生研究所(NIHR)卫生服务和交付研究方案资助,将全文发表在《卫生服务和交付研究》上;第八卷,第24期请参阅NIHR期刊图书馆网站了解更多项目信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum: Impact of NHS 111 Online on the NHS 111 telephone service and urgent care system: a mixed-methods study Impact of NHS 111 Online on the NHS 111 telephone service and urgent care system: a mixed-methods study STOPP/START interventions to improve medicines management for people aged 65 years and over: a realist synthesis Large-scale implementation of stroke early supported discharge: the WISE realist mixed-methods study GPs’ involvement to improve care quality in care homes in the UK: a realist review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1