The Impact of Mandatory Deleveraging on Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment in China

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Australian Accounting Review Pub Date : 2022-09-04 DOI:10.1111/auar.12383
Zihui Xu, Zifan Chen, Lixing Deng, Yan Yu
{"title":"The Impact of Mandatory Deleveraging on Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from a Quasi-experiment in China","authors":"Zihui Xu,&nbsp;Zifan Chen,&nbsp;Lixing Deng,&nbsp;Yan Yu","doi":"10.1111/auar.12383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Companies can use both debt and non-debt tax shields to accomplish tax avoidance. Using a quasi-experiment in China in which the government implemented deleveraging regulations in selected industries in 2015, this study provides novel evidence of the effect of mandatory deleveraging on corporate tax avoidance. The results show that implementing mandatory deleveraging leads to an increase in the degree of corporate tax avoidance. Mechanism analyses indicate that mandatory deleveraging curbs a company's inclination to take advantage of the tax benefits of debt, but increases its tendency of using non-debt tax shields, suggesting that companies will use non-debt tax shields as a substitute for debt tax shields. Supplementary analyses show that the effect of mandatory deleveraging is more pronounced for companies with more debt, higher financing constraints and weaker tax enforcement, as well as for companies that are state owned.</p>","PeriodicalId":51552,"journal":{"name":"Australian Accounting Review","volume":"32 3","pages":"352-366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/auar.12383","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/auar.12383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Companies can use both debt and non-debt tax shields to accomplish tax avoidance. Using a quasi-experiment in China in which the government implemented deleveraging regulations in selected industries in 2015, this study provides novel evidence of the effect of mandatory deleveraging on corporate tax avoidance. The results show that implementing mandatory deleveraging leads to an increase in the degree of corporate tax avoidance. Mechanism analyses indicate that mandatory deleveraging curbs a company's inclination to take advantage of the tax benefits of debt, but increases its tendency of using non-debt tax shields, suggesting that companies will use non-debt tax shields as a substitute for debt tax shields. Supplementary analyses show that the effect of mandatory deleveraging is more pronounced for companies with more debt, higher financing constraints and weaker tax enforcement, as well as for companies that are state owned.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制性去杠杆对企业避税的影响:来自中国准实验的证据
企业可以利用债务和非债务两种税收盾牌来实现避税。本研究利用2015年中国政府在选定行业实施去杠杆监管的准实验,为强制性去杠杆对企业避税的影响提供了新的证据。研究结果表明,实施强制性去杠杆导致企业避税程度上升。机制分析表明,强制性去杠杆抑制了企业利用债务税收优惠的倾向,但增加了企业使用非债务税盾的倾向,表明企业将使用非债务税盾来替代债务税盾。补充分析显示,强制性去杠杆化对债务更多、融资约束更严格、税收执法力度更弱的企业以及国有企业的影响更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Accounting Review
Australian Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Boundaries of Accounting The Shifting and Permeable Boundaries of Auditing: Evidence from Early Australian Examination Papers CEO Benevolence and Corporate Social Performance Integrated Reporting Impact on Core Organisational Practices: A Practice-Based Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1