The prognostic significance of the discordance between right- and left-side filling pressures in advanced heart failure: Data from the right heart catheterization registry of rajaie heart center (RHC-RHC Registry)

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Research in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4103/rcm.rcm_56_21
S. Naeini, Ermia Tabandeh, S. Taghavi, A. Amin, M. Mirtajaddini, Razieh Omidvar, M. Maleki, H. Bakhshandeh, N. Naderi
{"title":"The prognostic significance of the discordance between right- and left-side filling pressures in advanced heart failure: Data from the right heart catheterization registry of rajaie heart center (RHC-RHC Registry)","authors":"S. Naeini, Ermia Tabandeh, S. Taghavi, A. Amin, M. Mirtajaddini, Razieh Omidvar, M. Maleki, H. Bakhshandeh, N. Naderi","doi":"10.4103/rcm.rcm_56_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The prognostic significance of filling pressures and the relationship between left and right heart filling pressures have been well characterized in patients with heart failure. In the present study, we sought to evaluate the prevalence of discordance between left- and right-sided filling pressures and their relationship with clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and outcome measures (mortality and heart transplantation) in patients who were registered in right heart catheterization registry of Rajaie Heart Center (RHC-RHC registry). Methods: The hospital information system was queried for all adult patients with diagnosis of chronic heart failure who had undergone right heart catheterization between July 2009 and July 2019 in heart failure and transplantation department. The following variables were measured for each patient: mean right atrial pressure; systolic and end-diastolic right ventricular pressures; systolic, diastolic, and mean pulmonary artery pressure; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP); mixed venous oxygen saturation; and cardiac output and cardiac index by Fick technique. The RAP/PCWP ratio was also calculated. The outcome of interest was all-cause mortality and heart transplantation after the index right heart catheterization. All of the patients were monitored for all-cause mortality or heart transplantation until July 2020. Results: Among 1941 patients, a total of 1078 patients (75% male) were selected. The mean (standard deviation) of age was 42.7 (15.7) years. Heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) was found in the majority of patients (85.1%), with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy being the most frequent etiologies. The concordance between right and left filling pressures is more noticeable in patients with HFREF and heart failure mildly reduced EF than in patients with heart failure preserved EF (HFPEF). The median (interquartile range) of follow-up duration was 24 (6–48) months. During the follow-up time, 676 (62.7%) patients met the study outcomes of interest within <5 days to 96 months following the index RHC. Conclusion: The results of this study show that right and left filling pressure may be discordant in up to one-third of patients with advanced heart failure. However, the right and left heart-filling pressures would be more concordance as the disease is more advanced.","PeriodicalId":21031,"journal":{"name":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"20 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/rcm.rcm_56_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The prognostic significance of filling pressures and the relationship between left and right heart filling pressures have been well characterized in patients with heart failure. In the present study, we sought to evaluate the prevalence of discordance between left- and right-sided filling pressures and their relationship with clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and outcome measures (mortality and heart transplantation) in patients who were registered in right heart catheterization registry of Rajaie Heart Center (RHC-RHC registry). Methods: The hospital information system was queried for all adult patients with diagnosis of chronic heart failure who had undergone right heart catheterization between July 2009 and July 2019 in heart failure and transplantation department. The following variables were measured for each patient: mean right atrial pressure; systolic and end-diastolic right ventricular pressures; systolic, diastolic, and mean pulmonary artery pressure; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP); mixed venous oxygen saturation; and cardiac output and cardiac index by Fick technique. The RAP/PCWP ratio was also calculated. The outcome of interest was all-cause mortality and heart transplantation after the index right heart catheterization. All of the patients were monitored for all-cause mortality or heart transplantation until July 2020. Results: Among 1941 patients, a total of 1078 patients (75% male) were selected. The mean (standard deviation) of age was 42.7 (15.7) years. Heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) was found in the majority of patients (85.1%), with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy being the most frequent etiologies. The concordance between right and left filling pressures is more noticeable in patients with HFREF and heart failure mildly reduced EF than in patients with heart failure preserved EF (HFPEF). The median (interquartile range) of follow-up duration was 24 (6–48) months. During the follow-up time, 676 (62.7%) patients met the study outcomes of interest within <5 days to 96 months following the index RHC. Conclusion: The results of this study show that right and left filling pressure may be discordant in up to one-third of patients with advanced heart failure. However, the right and left heart-filling pressures would be more concordance as the disease is more advanced.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期心力衰竭患者左右侧充血压力不一致的预后意义:来自rajaie心脏中心右心导管登记的数据(RHC-RHC registry)
导读:在心力衰竭患者中,充盈压力的预后意义以及左右心充盈压力之间的关系已经得到了很好的表征。在本研究中,我们试图评估在Rajaie心脏中心(RHC-RHC)右心导管登记的患者中,左右侧充盈压力不一致的普遍程度及其与临床特征、实验室数据和结果测量(死亡率和心脏移植)的关系。方法:查询2009年7月至2019年7月心力衰竭与移植科所有诊断为慢性心力衰竭的成年右心导管患者的医院信息系统。测量每位患者的以下变量:平均右心房压;收缩期和舒张末期右心室压力;收缩压、舒张压和平均肺动脉压;肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP);混合静脉氧饱和度;用菲克法测定心输出量和心指数。同时计算RAP/PCWP比值。结果感兴趣的是全因死亡率和心脏移植后的指数右心导管。直到2020年7月,所有患者都接受了全因死亡率或心脏移植监测。结果:1941例患者中,共入选1078例,其中男性占75%。年龄的平均值(标准差)为42.7(15.7)岁。大多数患者(85.1%)出现心力衰竭射血分数降低(HFREF),其中非缺血性扩张型心肌病和缺血性心肌病是最常见的病因。左、右充血压力的一致性在HFREF和心力衰竭轻度降低的EF患者中比在心力衰竭保留EF (HFPEF)患者中更为明显。随访时间中位数(四分位数间距)为24(6-48)个月。在随访期间,676例(62.7%)患者在指数RHC后<5天至96个月内达到了研究目的。结论:本研究结果表明,在多达三分之一的晚期心力衰竭患者中,左右心室充盈压力可能不一致。然而,随着病情的发展,左、右心脏充盈压力会更加一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
An unusual presentation of a rare case of rhabdomyosarcoma of the left atrium as severe rheumatic mitral stenosis with atrial fibrillation, fast ventricular rate, and left atrial failure Prognostic value of cardiac and noncardiac biomarkers in infective endocarditis: A prospective cross-sectional study Transcatheter closure of the aortopulmonary window with a multifunctional occluder device Predictions of adherence to treatment in patients referred to the heart failure clinic of Shahid Rajaee Hospital in Tehran The association between statin dosage and malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for ischemic cardiomyopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1