Safeguarding the South African public broadcaster: governance, civil society and the SABC

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17577632.2018.1592284
V. Bronstein, Judith Katzew
{"title":"Safeguarding the South African public broadcaster: governance, civil society and the SABC","authors":"V. Bronstein, Judith Katzew","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2018.1592284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The South African public broadcaster, the SABC has faced serious threats to its independence. The ruling African National Congress has been the dominant political party since South Africa’s first democratic elections and factional battles have played out in the SABC from time to time. President Zuma and the Minister of Communications visibly took control of the SABC through Hlaudi Motsoeneng, the Chief Operations Officer between 2011 and 2017. This article examines the mechanisms and processes that allowed institutional safeguards intended to guard the autonomy and independence of the SABC to be subverted. The incorporation of the SABC as a company accounts for some of its vulnerability. Although good institutional and governance structures are important for any public broadcaster, they cannot protect the institution on their own. Vocal political support for independent public broadcasting crossed frontiers of race, class and politics. This support accounts for the resilience of the SABC.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2018.1592284","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2018.1592284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The South African public broadcaster, the SABC has faced serious threats to its independence. The ruling African National Congress has been the dominant political party since South Africa’s first democratic elections and factional battles have played out in the SABC from time to time. President Zuma and the Minister of Communications visibly took control of the SABC through Hlaudi Motsoeneng, the Chief Operations Officer between 2011 and 2017. This article examines the mechanisms and processes that allowed institutional safeguards intended to guard the autonomy and independence of the SABC to be subverted. The incorporation of the SABC as a company accounts for some of its vulnerability. Although good institutional and governance structures are important for any public broadcaster, they cannot protect the institution on their own. Vocal political support for independent public broadcasting crossed frontiers of race, class and politics. This support accounts for the resilience of the SABC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维护南非公共广播公司:治理、民间社会和南非广播公司
南非广播公司作为南非的公共广播公司,其独立性面临严重威胁。自南非第一次民主选举以来,执政的非洲人国民大会一直是占主导地位的政党,南非基础设施委员会不时爆发派系斗争。2011年至2017年间,祖马总统和通信部长通过首席运营官Hlaudi Motsoeneng明显控制了南非广播公司。这篇文章探讨了允许旨在保护SABC自主性和独立性的制度保障被颠覆的机制和过程。SABC作为一家公司的合并说明了它的一些弱点。尽管良好的体制和治理结构对任何公共广播机构都很重要,但它们无法单独保护该机构。对独立公共广播的政治支持跨越了种族、阶级和政治的边界。这种支持说明了SABC的弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Media Law
Journal of Media Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The only platform for focused, rigorous analysis of global developments in media law, this peer-reviewed journal, launched in Summer 2009, is: essential for teaching and research, essential for practice, essential for policy-making. It turns the spotlight on all those aspects of law which impinge on and shape modern media practices - from regulation and ownership, to libel law and constitutional aspects of broadcasting such as free speech and privacy, obscenity laws, copyright, piracy, and other aspects of IT law. The result is the first journal to take a serious view of law through the lens. The first issues feature articles on a wide range of topics such as: Developments in Defamation · Balancing Freedom of Expression and Privacy in the European Court of Human Rights · The Future of Public Television · Cameras in the Courtroom - Media Access to Classified Documents · Advertising Revenue v Editorial Independence · Gordon Ramsay: Obscenity Regulation Pioneer?
期刊最新文献
The Bypass Strategy: platforms, the Online Safety Act and future of online speech Freedom of expression after disinformation: Towards a new paradigm for the right to receive information The Digital Services Act’s red line: what the Commission can and cannot do about disinformation The regulation of disinformation: a critical appraisal The EU policy on disinformation: aims and legal basis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1