Critical Perspective Analysis of Higher Education Studies in the Online Mode – Emerging Challenges and Solutions

Q3 Social Sciences IAFOR Journal of Education Pub Date : 2021-12-18 DOI:10.22492/ije.9.6.10
Harshil Sathwara, Archie Joshi, Geetali Saha
{"title":"Critical Perspective Analysis of Higher Education Studies in the Online Mode – Emerging Challenges and Solutions","authors":"Harshil Sathwara, Archie Joshi, Geetali Saha","doi":"10.22492/ije.9.6.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many academic institutions that had previously hesitated to modify their old pedagogical method had to opt for completely online modules due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. This paper provides insight into the perception of students of higher education concerning the online mode of learning. Data was collected from 310 students pursuing different courses. A questionnaire, divided into 7 sections was administered including: general information of students, time management, understanding of course content, view of students on assignments and submissions, ease and comfort of study, skill development and motivation, and course satisfaction. The data was analyzed quantitative analysis. Results showed that 72.4% of students do not prefer the online platform for learning and this view is contributed by parameters like net connectivity, time, overall development of the candidate and evaluation of the course outcomes. Various parameters such as internet connectivity, parallel data users, unwanted anxiety, extra time, comfort, understanding of the concepts, interaction, information absorption and retainment, course evaluation and assignments, expense comparison, skill development, lecture participation and extracurricular growth were mentioned. It is suggested that an alternative to classroom learning must be used to maintain one's academic progress.","PeriodicalId":52248,"journal":{"name":"IAFOR Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAFOR Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.6.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many academic institutions that had previously hesitated to modify their old pedagogical method had to opt for completely online modules due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. This paper provides insight into the perception of students of higher education concerning the online mode of learning. Data was collected from 310 students pursuing different courses. A questionnaire, divided into 7 sections was administered including: general information of students, time management, understanding of course content, view of students on assignments and submissions, ease and comfort of study, skill development and motivation, and course satisfaction. The data was analyzed quantitative analysis. Results showed that 72.4% of students do not prefer the online platform for learning and this view is contributed by parameters like net connectivity, time, overall development of the candidate and evaluation of the course outcomes. Various parameters such as internet connectivity, parallel data users, unwanted anxiety, extra time, comfort, understanding of the concepts, interaction, information absorption and retainment, course evaluation and assignments, expense comparison, skill development, lecture participation and extracurricular growth were mentioned. It is suggested that an alternative to classroom learning must be used to maintain one's academic progress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线模式下高等教育研究的批判视角分析——新出现的挑战与解决方案
由于新冠肺炎全球大流行,许多学术机构此前对修改其旧的教学方法犹豫不决,不得不选择完全在线的模块。本文深入了解了高等教育学生对在线学习模式的看法。数据来自310名修读不同课程的学生。问卷分为7个部分,包括:学生的一般信息、时间管理、对课程内容的理解、学生对作业和提交材料的看法、学习的轻松性和舒适性、技能发展和动机以及课程满意度。对数据进行了定量分析。结果显示,72.4%的学生不喜欢在线学习平台,这一观点是由网络连接、时间、候选人的整体发展和课程成绩评估等参数促成的。提到了各种参数,如互联网连接、平行数据用户、不必要的焦虑、额外时间、舒适度、对概念的理解、互动、信息吸收和保留、课程评估和作业、费用比较、技能发展、课堂参与和课外成长。有人建议,为了保持一个人的学术进步,必须使用课堂学习的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IAFOR Journal of Education
IAFOR Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intercultural Communication: The Perceptions of Lebanese High School Directors Adoption of Innovative ELT Strategies by English Language Teachers in Rural Laos Examining Students’ Perspectives on Pedagogical Translanguaging in the Multilingual Classroom Context Enriching Students’ Cross-Cultural and Multilingual Communication: The Serious Play Approach Utilizing Playmobil Pro Figures Language Attrition and Cultural Identity Dynamics in International Schools in Azerbaijan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1