The Freedom of Religion in the Post-Soviet Georgia

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Development Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.52340/jds.2022.02.27
Manana Darchashvili, Tina Tskhovrebadze
{"title":"The Freedom of Religion in the Post-Soviet Georgia","authors":"Manana Darchashvili, Tina Tskhovrebadze","doi":"10.52340/jds.2022.02.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After declaring the independence of the Georgian state at the end of the 20th century Georgia faced different kinds of challenges in internal politics and one of the most important issues among them was a peaceful coexistence of multi-ethnical and multi-religious groups in the new realities. Any governments of Georgia have always taken into consideration the issue.\n\nDepending on the actuality of the theme, we define the main aim of the paper, which is studying the quality of the freedom of religion in Post-Soviet Georgia. The work analysis the content of the research-based documents on freedom of beliefs and religions, prepared by different international organizations, and how the Georgian government reacts and answers to the dilemmas of freedom of religion. The empirical data such are – scientific works, research papers, official documents written by the state institutions discussed with the historicism method.\n\nThe paper suggests different angles of view over the religious freedom reality in Georgia - how effective are tools and steps made by the Georgian government for solving the controversy or similar flows in society. What kinds of arrangements do the government creates for implementing recommendations worked out by the international organizations and guaranteeing basement religious freedom, respect for them, and tolerance.\n\nModern Georgian policy on religion is oriented on peaceful examples shown by various counties political experience and nearest past, it relies on new trends in global politics and is looking for ways for creating a comprehensive environment for religious freedom and expression, at least all those measures serve and are meaningful pillars for creating democratic prosperity in Georgia","PeriodicalId":48295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52340/jds.2022.02.27","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After declaring the independence of the Georgian state at the end of the 20th century Georgia faced different kinds of challenges in internal politics and one of the most important issues among them was a peaceful coexistence of multi-ethnical and multi-religious groups in the new realities. Any governments of Georgia have always taken into consideration the issue. Depending on the actuality of the theme, we define the main aim of the paper, which is studying the quality of the freedom of religion in Post-Soviet Georgia. The work analysis the content of the research-based documents on freedom of beliefs and religions, prepared by different international organizations, and how the Georgian government reacts and answers to the dilemmas of freedom of religion. The empirical data such are – scientific works, research papers, official documents written by the state institutions discussed with the historicism method. The paper suggests different angles of view over the religious freedom reality in Georgia - how effective are tools and steps made by the Georgian government for solving the controversy or similar flows in society. What kinds of arrangements do the government creates for implementing recommendations worked out by the international organizations and guaranteeing basement religious freedom, respect for them, and tolerance. Modern Georgian policy on religion is oriented on peaceful examples shown by various counties political experience and nearest past, it relies on new trends in global politics and is looking for ways for creating a comprehensive environment for religious freedom and expression, at least all those measures serve and are meaningful pillars for creating democratic prosperity in Georgia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后苏联格鲁吉亚的宗教自由
格鲁吉亚在20世纪末宣布独立后,在国内政治上面临着各种各样的挑战,其中最重要的问题之一是在新的现实中多民族和多宗教群体的和平共处。格鲁吉亚历届政府一直在考虑这个问题。根据选题的现状,我们确定了本文的主要目的,即研究后苏联时期格鲁吉亚宗教自由的质量。本文分析了不同国际组织所准备的关于信仰和宗教自由的研究性文件的内容,以及格鲁吉亚政府如何应对宗教自由的困境。用历史决定论的方法对科学著作、研究论文、国家机关公文等实证资料进行了探讨。文章对格鲁吉亚的宗教自由现状提出了不同的观点——格鲁吉亚政府为解决社会上的争议或类似流动所采取的工具和步骤的效果如何。为落实国际组织制定的建议,保障基本宗教自由、尊重宗教自由和宗教宽容,政府作出了怎样的安排?现代格鲁吉亚的宗教政策以各国的政治经验和最近的过去所显示的和平例子为导向,它依赖于全球政治的新趋势,并正在寻找创造一个全面的宗教自由和言论环境的方法,至少所有这些措施都是在格鲁吉亚创造民主繁荣的有意义的支柱
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: The Journal of Development Studies was the first and is one of the best known international journals in the area of development studies. Since its foundation in 1964, it has published many seminal articles on development and opened up new areas of debate. Priority is given to papers which are: • relevant to important current research in development policy, theory and analysis • make a novel and significant contribution to the field • provide critical tests, based on empirical work, of alternative theories, perspectives or schools of thought We invite articles that are interdisciplinary or focused on particular disciplines (e.g. economics, politics, geography, sociology or anthropology), with an expectation that all work is accessible to readers across the social sciences. The editors also welcome surveys of the literature in important fields of development policy. All research articles in this journal undergo rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous peer review. Given the high level of submissions, a majority of submissions are rejected quickly with reasons.
期刊最新文献
Lawful Sins: Abortion Rights and Reproductive Governance in Mexico Second Bread: Potato Cultivation and Food Security in Kyrgyzstan Democracy in Hard Places Controlling the Capital: Political Dominance in the Urbanizing World Caste Inequality in Medical Crowdfunding in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1