Impact of chief financial officer’s experience on the assurance of corporate social responsibility reports in China

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS Society and Business Review Pub Date : 2022-04-08 DOI:10.1108/sbr-10-2021-0190
Fahad Khalid, Khwaja Naveed, Xingxing He, Chenyun Ye
{"title":"Impact of chief financial officer’s experience on the assurance of corporate social responsibility reports in China","authors":"Fahad Khalid, Khwaja Naveed, Xingxing He, Chenyun Ye","doi":"10.1108/sbr-10-2021-0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nGiven the emerging importance of the chief financial officer’s (CFO) role, this study aims to probe into the prevalence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) assurance practices in China and to examine whether or not CFO foreign, professional or academic experience affects the likelihood of CSR assurance decision.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAll A-share listed Chinese companies during the year 2008–2017 with 5,144 firm-year observations have been investigated for this study.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study finds a positive effect of CFO foreign and professional experience on CSR assurance. No significant association has been found between the CFO’s academic experience and CSR assurance. Additional analysis for Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) sampled firms shows that the academic and professional experience of CFOs has a significant positive association with CSR assurance. However, the main findings are replicated in the case of firms under mandatory CSR reporting.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe limitations of this study are its generalizability, unidimensional measure of CSR assurance which is unable to capture its quality and explore the other traits of CFOs.\n\n\nPractical implications\nIt provides assurance practitioners with valuable longitudinal data on China’s CSR reporting and assurance services. Also, firms should recognize the importance of having competent CFOs to improve the credibility of their CSR reporting. The cross-sectional variation analysis (GRI and mandatory CSR) will help firms to assess the value of each CFO attribute for their nonfinancial reporting and auditing choices while considering internal and external stakeholder demands.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study not only updates the existing understanding of CSR assurance methods in China but also explains the significance of CFO-specific experience in enhancing the credibility of nonfinancial reporting.\n","PeriodicalId":44608,"journal":{"name":"Society and Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-10-2021-0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Given the emerging importance of the chief financial officer’s (CFO) role, this study aims to probe into the prevalence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) assurance practices in China and to examine whether or not CFO foreign, professional or academic experience affects the likelihood of CSR assurance decision. Design/methodology/approach All A-share listed Chinese companies during the year 2008–2017 with 5,144 firm-year observations have been investigated for this study. Findings This study finds a positive effect of CFO foreign and professional experience on CSR assurance. No significant association has been found between the CFO’s academic experience and CSR assurance. Additional analysis for Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) sampled firms shows that the academic and professional experience of CFOs has a significant positive association with CSR assurance. However, the main findings are replicated in the case of firms under mandatory CSR reporting. Research limitations/implications The limitations of this study are its generalizability, unidimensional measure of CSR assurance which is unable to capture its quality and explore the other traits of CFOs. Practical implications It provides assurance practitioners with valuable longitudinal data on China’s CSR reporting and assurance services. Also, firms should recognize the importance of having competent CFOs to improve the credibility of their CSR reporting. The cross-sectional variation analysis (GRI and mandatory CSR) will help firms to assess the value of each CFO attribute for their nonfinancial reporting and auditing choices while considering internal and external stakeholder demands. Originality/value This study not only updates the existing understanding of CSR assurance methods in China but also explains the significance of CFO-specific experience in enhancing the credibility of nonfinancial reporting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首席财务官经验对我国企业社会责任报告保障的影响
目的鉴于首席财务官(CFO)角色的重要性日益显现,本研究旨在探讨中国企业社会责任(CSR)担保实践的普遍性,并检验CFO的外国、专业或学术经验是否会影响企业社会责任担保决策的可能性。设计/方法/方法本研究对2008-2017年中国A股上市公司进行了5144个公司年度的调查。本研究发现,CFO的国外和专业经验对企业社会责任保证有积极影响。首席财务官的学术经验与企业社会责任保证之间没有发现显著的关联。对全球报告倡议(GRI)抽样公司的额外分析表明,首席财务官的学术和专业经验与企业社会责任保证有着显著的正相关。然而,主要研究结果在强制性企业社会责任报告下的企业中得到了复制。研究局限性/含义本研究的局限性在于其可推广性,即企业社会责任保证的一维度量,无法捕捉其质量并探索首席财务官的其他特征。实际含义它为保险从业人员提供了关于中国企业社会责任报告和保险服务的有价值的纵向数据。此外,企业应认识到拥有称职的首席财务官对提高企业社会责任报告可信度的重要性。横截面变化分析(GRI和强制性CSR)将帮助公司在考虑内部和外部利益相关者需求的同时,评估其非财务报告和审计选择的每个CFO属性的价值。原创性/价值本研究不仅更新了中国对企业社会责任保证方法的现有理解,还解释了首席财务官的具体经验在提高非财务报告可信度方面的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
The influence of workplace Confucian culture on employees’ organizational commitment through the modelling role of moral identities Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: the moderating role of economic freedom The impact of flexible work arrangements on an older grieving population Mandatory CSR regime strips the competitive advantage: a comparative study of pre-post CSR mandate using the Bandwagon-bias effect theory Back to the basics: is business ethics an oxymoron?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1