“The Spirit of Martyrdom is Over”: Irony, Communication, and Indifference in Daniel Defoe’s The Shortest Way with the Dissenters (1702)

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10436928.2022.2019507
J. Galbraith
{"title":"“The Spirit of Martyrdom is Over”: Irony, Communication, and Indifference in Daniel Defoe’s The Shortest Way with the Dissenters (1702)","authors":"J. Galbraith","doi":"10.1080/10436928.2022.2019507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Questions of interpretation have dominated the reading of The Shortest Way with the Dissenters since its initial publication in 1702. Claiming to be the work of an extremist Anglican clergyman, the prose satire called for persecuting those who did not conform to the established Church of England. Because it was printed anonymously, many of Daniel Defoe’s initial readers failed to realize that the pamphlet’s author, a Dissenter, did not actually espouse its incendiary argument. When it was revealed that he was the author, Defoe insisted that the pamphlet was not meant to be taken straight. It was a work of irony. As is well known, the authorities read the text much differently, charging Defoe with seditious libel and sentencing him to the pillory. Although interpretive differences no longer bear such high stakes, literary scholars continue to disagree concerning how best to interpret The Shortest Way. For some scholars, the issue is how, or to what extent, irony operates in the satire, whereas others remain skeptical whether irony can be found in the satire at all. Scholars who would otherwise disagree tend to find common ground in the assumption that Defoe had little in common with the bombastic priest he aimed to expose. The present essay reframes the conversation surrounding The Shortest Way by challenging this traditional assumption. It does so by examining the satire in light of the changes taking place in the discourse of religion, particularly as these changes appeared in the controversy surrounding occasional conformity. During the Restoration period, the practice of occasional conformity developed as a work-around to the Test Act requiring officeholders to prove their conformity to the established church. Provided that the Dissenter could attest to have taken the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper in a parish church, it did not matter that he continued to attend his nonconformist meeting house. This practice of communicating, or receiving communion, in different churches raised serious issues for both Defoe and the high churchmen he sought to expose. The problem of communication, of negating the distinction between the parish church and the meeting-house, becomes evident in Defoe’s speaker’s remark that “the Spirit of Martyrdom is over” (The Shortest Way 106). According to Defoe’s high-church Anglican","PeriodicalId":42717,"journal":{"name":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","volume":"33 1","pages":"22 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2022.2019507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions of interpretation have dominated the reading of The Shortest Way with the Dissenters since its initial publication in 1702. Claiming to be the work of an extremist Anglican clergyman, the prose satire called for persecuting those who did not conform to the established Church of England. Because it was printed anonymously, many of Daniel Defoe’s initial readers failed to realize that the pamphlet’s author, a Dissenter, did not actually espouse its incendiary argument. When it was revealed that he was the author, Defoe insisted that the pamphlet was not meant to be taken straight. It was a work of irony. As is well known, the authorities read the text much differently, charging Defoe with seditious libel and sentencing him to the pillory. Although interpretive differences no longer bear such high stakes, literary scholars continue to disagree concerning how best to interpret The Shortest Way. For some scholars, the issue is how, or to what extent, irony operates in the satire, whereas others remain skeptical whether irony can be found in the satire at all. Scholars who would otherwise disagree tend to find common ground in the assumption that Defoe had little in common with the bombastic priest he aimed to expose. The present essay reframes the conversation surrounding The Shortest Way by challenging this traditional assumption. It does so by examining the satire in light of the changes taking place in the discourse of religion, particularly as these changes appeared in the controversy surrounding occasional conformity. During the Restoration period, the practice of occasional conformity developed as a work-around to the Test Act requiring officeholders to prove their conformity to the established church. Provided that the Dissenter could attest to have taken the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper in a parish church, it did not matter that he continued to attend his nonconformist meeting house. This practice of communicating, or receiving communion, in different churches raised serious issues for both Defoe and the high churchmen he sought to expose. The problem of communication, of negating the distinction between the parish church and the meeting-house, becomes evident in Defoe’s speaker’s remark that “the Spirit of Martyrdom is over” (The Shortest Way 106). According to Defoe’s high-church Anglican
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“殉难精神结束了”:笛福《与持不同政见者最短之路》(1702)中的讽刺、沟通与冷漠
自1702年《与异议者的最短道路》首次出版以来,解读问题一直主导着该书的阅读。这部讽刺散文声称是一位极端的圣公会牧师的作品,呼吁迫害那些不符合既定英国教会的人。由于这本书是匿名印刷的,丹尼尔·笛福最初的许多读者都没有意识到,这本小册子的作者,一个持不同政见者,实际上并没有支持它的煽动性论点。当他被揭露是作者时,笛福坚持说这本小册子不是要直截了当的。这是一部具有讽刺意味的作品。众所周知,当局对文本的解读大不相同,指控笛福犯有煽动性诽谤罪,并判处他终身监禁。尽管解释上的差异不再具有如此高的利害关系,但文学学者们在如何最好地解读《最短的路》方面仍然存在分歧。对一些学者来说,问题是讽刺在讽刺中是如何运作的,或者在多大程度上运作的,而另一些学者则对讽刺是否能在讽刺中找到持怀疑态度。否则持不同意见的学者往往会在这样一种假设中找到共同点,即笛福与他想要揭露的夸夸其谈的牧师几乎没有共同点。本文通过挑战这一传统假设,重新定义了围绕《最短的路》的对话。它通过根据宗教话语中发生的变化来审视讽刺,特别是当这些变化出现在围绕偶尔顺从的争议中时。在复辟时期,偶尔合规的做法发展成为《测试法》的一项变通措施,该法案要求官员证明他们符合既定教会。如果持不同政见者能够证明他在教区教堂参加了主晚餐圣礼,那么他继续参加他不墨守成规的会议室也没关系。这种在不同教堂交流或接受圣餐的做法给笛福和他试图揭露的高级牧师带来了严重的问题。沟通的问题,否定了教区教堂和会议室之间的区别,在笛福的演讲中变得很明显,“殉道精神已经结束”(《最短的路》106)。根据笛福的圣公会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Alex as the Product, Producer, and Consumer of Art in the Dilapidated State, in Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange Friendship and Art in Valerie Martin’s I Give It to You Reading As Conversation with the Overarching Blended Author (Or Roberto Bolaño): Joint Attention, Immersion, and Interaction The Objects of Jane Gardam The Book, Meaning, and Densities of Essential Forms in J.M. Coetzee’s Foe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1