Representing rape culture on teen television

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION Popular Communication Pub Date : 2020-12-28 DOI:10.1080/15405702.2020.1868044
E. Ryalls
{"title":"Representing rape culture on teen television","authors":"E. Ryalls","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2020.1868044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Increasing cultural attention to sexual assault in the U.S. has raised questions about consent, leading some states to implement “yes means yes” laws. In order to provide insight into how mainstream discourse take into account feminist understandings of sexual violence and affirmative consent, this article considers representations of rape culture and affirmative consent in two recent teen television programs, 13 Reasons Why (2017-2020) and Sweet/Vicious (2016–2017). Both shows reference sexual assault in nearly every episode, constructing a world in which rape culture is rampant. In portraying rape as lack of consent, as opposed to outright refusal or resistance, the shows do the important work of emphasizing why affirmative consent is essential. While progressively suggesting that rape culture necessitates affirmative consent, 13 Reasons Why and Sweet/Vicious simultaneously contribute to rape culture by relying on the long-standing trope that, when it comes to girls and sexual assault, “no” may mean “yes.”","PeriodicalId":45584,"journal":{"name":"Popular Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15405702.2020.1868044","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Popular Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2020.1868044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Increasing cultural attention to sexual assault in the U.S. has raised questions about consent, leading some states to implement “yes means yes” laws. In order to provide insight into how mainstream discourse take into account feminist understandings of sexual violence and affirmative consent, this article considers representations of rape culture and affirmative consent in two recent teen television programs, 13 Reasons Why (2017-2020) and Sweet/Vicious (2016–2017). Both shows reference sexual assault in nearly every episode, constructing a world in which rape culture is rampant. In portraying rape as lack of consent, as opposed to outright refusal or resistance, the shows do the important work of emphasizing why affirmative consent is essential. While progressively suggesting that rape culture necessitates affirmative consent, 13 Reasons Why and Sweet/Vicious simultaneously contribute to rape culture by relying on the long-standing trope that, when it comes to girls and sexual assault, “no” may mean “yes.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在青少年电视节目中代表强奸文化
摘要:在美国,越来越多的文化关注性侵犯,引发了人们对同意的质疑,导致一些州实施了“是即是”的法律。为了深入了解主流话语如何考虑到女权主义对性暴力和平权同意的理解,本文考虑了最近两个青少年电视节目《13个原因》(2017-2020)和《甜蜜/邪恶》(2016-2017)中强奸文化和平权赞同的表现。这两部剧几乎每一集都提到性侵,构建了一个强奸文化泛滥的世界。这些节目将强奸描述为缺乏同意,而不是直接拒绝或抵抗,强调了为什么肯定同意至关重要。虽然逐渐表明强奸文化需要肯定同意,但《13个为什么》和《甜蜜/邪恶》同时也助长了强奸文化,因为它们依赖于一个长期存在的比喻,即当涉及到女孩和性侵时,“不”可能意味着“是”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Popular Communication
Popular Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Video game characters and transmedia storytelling. The dynamic game character, A big little fiction form: last decade of production and circulation of made-for-TV movies in Europe Unspooled: how the cassette made music sharable Mourning the greatest: “unforgivably black” and peacefully Muslim Muhammad Ali Making fandom great again: silencing discussions of racism in reactionary and transformative fandoms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1