Examination of Sensory Recovery of Breasts Reconstructed With Silicone Breast Implants After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1177/22925503231175507
Masahiro Sasaki, Yukiko Aihara, Kaoru Sasaki, Junya Oshima, Yoichiro Shibuya, Mitsuru Sekido
{"title":"Examination of Sensory Recovery of Breasts Reconstructed With Silicone Breast Implants After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.","authors":"Masahiro Sasaki, Yukiko Aihara, Kaoru Sasaki, Junya Oshima, Yoichiro Shibuya, Mitsuru Sekido","doi":"10.1177/22925503231175507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Reconstructed breast with silicone breast implants (SBIs) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) provides high patient satisfaction from a cosmetic point of view, but low patient satisfaction with respect to hypoesthesia of the reconstructed breast, and reinnervation is required. Currently, few reports are available on reinnervation in breast reconstruction with implants, and detailed data on desensitization of reconstructed breasts are lacking. Therefore, we examined perceptual data after NSM with respect to reinnervation. <b>Methods:</b> In our department, after NSM, tissue expander or SBI was used to perform 1-stage or 2-stage breast reconstruction, and touch, warm and cold, and pain sensations in 31 cases more than 1 year after completion of reconstruction were examined. <b>Results:</b> All tests of sensations tended to be better in the medial region than in the lateral region, but no correlation with postoperative years was found. In the comparison of the incision lines, in the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (SW test), a significant difference was observed between the inframammary fold (IMF) incision and the para-areola incision in the breast D region, between the lateral incision and the para-areola incision, and between the IMF incision and the para-areola incision in the areola b region. In addition, linear regression analysis of postoperative years did not establish a predictive formula for the SW test or pain sensation in any of the 9 regions. <b>Conclusions:</b> The difference in the excision range was considered to be the largest factor affecting hypoesthesia. We also speculated that preservation of the internal mammary artery perforators during mastectomy led to preservation of the anterior cutaneous branch of the intercostal nerves, and therefore, the perception of the medial region was better than that of the lateral region. In the case of NSM in which the anterior cutaneous branch was preserved, the recovery of outer perception including that of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) was poor, so it was considered that nerve reconstruction between the lateral cutaneous branch and the NAC was effective for reinnervation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"7-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231175507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reconstructed breast with silicone breast implants (SBIs) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) provides high patient satisfaction from a cosmetic point of view, but low patient satisfaction with respect to hypoesthesia of the reconstructed breast, and reinnervation is required. Currently, few reports are available on reinnervation in breast reconstruction with implants, and detailed data on desensitization of reconstructed breasts are lacking. Therefore, we examined perceptual data after NSM with respect to reinnervation. Methods: In our department, after NSM, tissue expander or SBI was used to perform 1-stage or 2-stage breast reconstruction, and touch, warm and cold, and pain sensations in 31 cases more than 1 year after completion of reconstruction were examined. Results: All tests of sensations tended to be better in the medial region than in the lateral region, but no correlation with postoperative years was found. In the comparison of the incision lines, in the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (SW test), a significant difference was observed between the inframammary fold (IMF) incision and the para-areola incision in the breast D region, between the lateral incision and the para-areola incision, and between the IMF incision and the para-areola incision in the areola b region. In addition, linear regression analysis of postoperative years did not establish a predictive formula for the SW test or pain sensation in any of the 9 regions. Conclusions: The difference in the excision range was considered to be the largest factor affecting hypoesthesia. We also speculated that preservation of the internal mammary artery perforators during mastectomy led to preservation of the anterior cutaneous branch of the intercostal nerves, and therefore, the perception of the medial region was better than that of the lateral region. In the case of NSM in which the anterior cutaneous branch was preserved, the recovery of outer perception including that of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) was poor, so it was considered that nerve reconstruction between the lateral cutaneous branch and the NAC was effective for reinnervation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳头缺失型乳房切除术后硅胶乳房植入物重建乳房感觉恢复的检查
背景:保留乳头乳房切除术(NSM)后使用硅胶乳房植入物(SBIs)重建乳房,从美容的角度来看,患者满意度很高,但重建乳房的感觉迟钝患者满意度很低,需要重新神经支配。目前,很少有关于植入物乳房重建中神经再支配的报道,也缺乏关于重建乳房脱敏的详细数据。因此,我们研究了NSM后关于神经再支配的感知数据。方法:在我科,NSM术后,使用组织扩张器或SBI进行1期或2期乳房重建,并对31例重建后1年以上的患者的触觉、冷热和疼痛感进行检查。结果:内侧区的所有感觉测试往往比外侧区更好,但与术后年龄无关。在切口线的比较中,在Semmes-Weinstein单丝试验(SW试验)中,在乳房D区的乳下折叠(IMF)切口和乳晕旁切口之间、在乳晕b区的侧切口和乳糜旁切口之间以及在IMF切口和乳影旁切口之间观察到显著差异。此外,对术后年份的线性回归分析并没有建立9个区域中任何一个区域的SW测试或疼痛感觉的预测公式。结论:切除范围的差异被认为是影响感觉迟钝的最大因素。我们还推测,乳房切除术期间保留了乳内动脉穿支,从而保留了肋间神经的前皮支,因此,对内侧区域的感知优于对外侧区域的感知。在保留了前皮支的NSM的情况下,包括乳头-乳晕复合体(NAC)的外感恢复较差,因此认为外侧皮支和NAC之间的神经重建对神经再支配是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
期刊最新文献
A 5-Year Analysis of Saudi Arabian Applications to Plastic Surgery Residency Training in Canada. Rectovaginal Fistula Repair Following Vaginoplasty in Transgender Females: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques. Current Practices and Trends of Plastic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in Canada. Safety of Cefazolin Perioperative Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Patients With Penicillin Allergy: A Retrospective Chart Review. Long-Term Opioid Use After Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: Incidence and Associated Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1