The effects of efficiency on banks’ market risk: Empirical evidence from China

Mohd Fahmee Ab-Hamid, Hawati Janor, Aisyah Abdul-Rahman, Mariani Abdul-Majid
{"title":"The effects of efficiency on banks’ market risk: Empirical evidence from China","authors":"Mohd Fahmee Ab-Hamid, Hawati Janor, Aisyah Abdul-Rahman, Mariani Abdul-Majid","doi":"10.21315/aamjaf2021.17.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the effect of efficiencies on market risk using a sample of Chinese commercial banks from 2000 to 2015 using different measures of market risk; the Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES). The cost and profit efficiencies are estimated by the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) on the 12 biggest banks listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. In testing the effect between efficiency and market risk, this study applied four different models to uncover the relationship between VaR and ES as measures of market risk on cost and profit efficiencies. Utilising a panel data analysis, the results show that different banks efficiencies affect market risk measures differently. While bank cost efficiency reduces market risk, increase in profit efficiency increase market risk. The analysis in this study helps explain the unconvincing evidence of an inefficiencies-risk connection in the bank sector. Bank regulators and managers may need to focus on the cost and profit efficiencies-related initiatives to better manage the market risk. These findings provide bank managers with more understanding of bank risk and serve as an underpinning for bank supervision efforts aimed at strengthening the joint risk management of efficiency market risks.","PeriodicalId":44370,"journal":{"name":"Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2021.17.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article investigates the effect of efficiencies on market risk using a sample of Chinese commercial banks from 2000 to 2015 using different measures of market risk; the Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES). The cost and profit efficiencies are estimated by the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) on the 12 biggest banks listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. In testing the effect between efficiency and market risk, this study applied four different models to uncover the relationship between VaR and ES as measures of market risk on cost and profit efficiencies. Utilising a panel data analysis, the results show that different banks efficiencies affect market risk measures differently. While bank cost efficiency reduces market risk, increase in profit efficiency increase market risk. The analysis in this study helps explain the unconvincing evidence of an inefficiencies-risk connection in the bank sector. Bank regulators and managers may need to focus on the cost and profit efficiencies-related initiatives to better manage the market risk. These findings provide bank managers with more understanding of bank risk and serve as an underpinning for bank supervision efforts aimed at strengthening the joint risk management of efficiency market risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
效率对银行市场风险的影响:来自中国的经验证据
本文以2000 - 2015年中国商业银行为样本,采用不同的市场风险度量,考察了效率对市场风险的影响;风险价值(VaR)和预期缺口(ES)。利用随机前沿分析(SFA)对上海证券交易所上市的12家最大银行的成本和利润效率进行了估算。为了检验效率和市场风险之间的关系,本研究应用了四种不同的模型来揭示VaR和ES之间的关系,作为市场风险对成本和利润效率的度量。利用面板数据分析,结果表明,不同的银行效率对市场风险指标的影响不同。银行成本效率降低了市场风险,而利润效率的提高则增加了市场风险。本研究的分析有助于解释银行部门效率低下-风险关联的不令人信服的证据。银行监管者和管理者可能需要关注与成本和利润效率相关的举措,以更好地管理市场风险。这些发现为银行管理者提供了对银行风险的更多了解,并为旨在加强效率市场风险联合风险管理的银行监管工作提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: To provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and dissemination of empirical findings and analytical research in the specialized areas of accounting and finance with special emphasis on scholarly works with policy implications for countries in the Asia Pacific. The following are some of the topical subject areas relevant to the journal (but are not limited to): Accounting • Financial reporting and accounting standards • Auditing issues • Value based accounting and its relevance • Theory of accounting firm • Environmental auditing • Corporate governance issues • Public sector accounting Finance • Valuation of financial assets • International capital flows • Ownership and agency theory • Stock market behavior • Investment and portfolio management • Islamic banking and finance • Microstructures of financial markets
期刊最新文献
The Multifaceted Impact of Directors and Officers (D&O) Insurance on Corporate Governance and Performance The Relationship between Corporate Governance, Employee Salaries, Salary Gaps and Financial Performance Corporate Social Responsibility Practices, Corporate Sustainable Development, Venture Capital and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Chinese Public Listed Firms Volatility Spillovers Effects between Energy Commodities and Islamic Stock Markets Internationalisation Strategy and Management Accounting and Control Systems: A Network Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1