The criminalization of stalking and characteristics of court practices in stalking cases in Lithuania

Ilona Laurinaitytė, Ilona Michailovič, Liubovė Jarutienė, Justina Zokaitė
{"title":"The criminalization of stalking and characteristics of court practices in stalking cases in Lithuania","authors":"Ilona Laurinaitytė, Ilona Michailovič, Liubovė Jarutienė, Justina Zokaitė","doi":"10.15388/crimlithuan.2021.9.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stalking is considered a serious public health problem as well as a harmful form of victimization often leading to severe consequences for the victim. Although there is still little agreement on the exact definition of stalking, it has been recognized that the core elements of stalking include deliberateness and recurrence of the stalker’s actions as well as victim fear and concern for safety. The main purpose of this article is to debate on the definition of stalking as well as provide the rates of stalking in Lithuania. Authors conclude that stalking refers to a constellation of a diverse range of actions and may include both direct communication with the victim and the use of cyberspace technologies. A rapid development of modern digital technologies leads to a wide variety of complex stalking behavior patterns that makes it complicated to generate an adequate legal response to this phenomenon. The results of a public survey conducted by a research group from the Law Institute of the Centre for Social Sciences in 2021 show that the rates of stalking in Lithuania are comparable to those reported in foreign studies as 17.5% of Lithuanian population have experienced stalking at least once during their lifetime. Stalking by the current or former intimate partner was the most prevalent stalking category, as it comprised nearly 39% of all stalking cases in the state. The article also covers some aspect of court practices in stalking-related cases during the period from 2016 to 2020, before anti-stalking legislation was introduced in Lithuania. By year 2021, when stalking was criminalized in Lithuania, 23 European Union member countries have managed to develop criminal anti-stalking legislation. Another aim of this article is to discuss the way criminal anti-stalking legislation was introduced in Lithuania and compare Lithuanian approach to the legal provisions enacted in other countries. Authors conclude that although the introduction of criminal anti-stalking legislation in Lithuania was an important step towards ensuring victims’ safety, it still may possibly lead to some practical issues during the criminal investigation of stalking cases.","PeriodicalId":52861,"journal":{"name":"Kriminologijos studijos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kriminologijos studijos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/crimlithuan.2021.9.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stalking is considered a serious public health problem as well as a harmful form of victimization often leading to severe consequences for the victim. Although there is still little agreement on the exact definition of stalking, it has been recognized that the core elements of stalking include deliberateness and recurrence of the stalker’s actions as well as victim fear and concern for safety. The main purpose of this article is to debate on the definition of stalking as well as provide the rates of stalking in Lithuania. Authors conclude that stalking refers to a constellation of a diverse range of actions and may include both direct communication with the victim and the use of cyberspace technologies. A rapid development of modern digital technologies leads to a wide variety of complex stalking behavior patterns that makes it complicated to generate an adequate legal response to this phenomenon. The results of a public survey conducted by a research group from the Law Institute of the Centre for Social Sciences in 2021 show that the rates of stalking in Lithuania are comparable to those reported in foreign studies as 17.5% of Lithuanian population have experienced stalking at least once during their lifetime. Stalking by the current or former intimate partner was the most prevalent stalking category, as it comprised nearly 39% of all stalking cases in the state. The article also covers some aspect of court practices in stalking-related cases during the period from 2016 to 2020, before anti-stalking legislation was introduced in Lithuania. By year 2021, when stalking was criminalized in Lithuania, 23 European Union member countries have managed to develop criminal anti-stalking legislation. Another aim of this article is to discuss the way criminal anti-stalking legislation was introduced in Lithuania and compare Lithuanian approach to the legal provisions enacted in other countries. Authors conclude that although the introduction of criminal anti-stalking legislation in Lithuania was an important step towards ensuring victims’ safety, it still may possibly lead to some practical issues during the criminal investigation of stalking cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立陶宛跟踪案件的刑事定罪和跟踪案件的法院实践特点
跟踪被认为是一个严重的公共卫生问题,也是一种有害的受害形式,通常会给受害者带来严重后果。尽管对跟踪的确切定义仍没有达成一致,但人们已经认识到,跟踪的核心要素包括跟踪者行为的深思熟虑和反复发生,以及受害者对安全的恐惧和担忧。本文的主要目的是讨论跟踪的定义,并提供立陶宛的跟踪率。作者得出结论,跟踪是指一系列不同的行为,可能包括与受害者的直接沟通和网络空间技术的使用。现代数字技术的快速发展导致了各种复杂的跟踪行为模式,这使得对这一现象做出充分的法律回应变得复杂。社会科学中心法律研究所的一个研究小组在2021年进行的一项公开调查结果显示,立陶宛的跟踪率与外国研究报告的跟踪率相当,因为17.5%的立陶宛人口一生中至少经历过一次跟踪。现任或前任亲密伴侣的跟踪是最普遍的跟踪类别,因为它占该州所有跟踪案件的近39%。这篇文章还涵盖了2016年至2020年期间,立陶宛出台反跟踪立法之前,法院在跟踪相关案件中的一些做法。到2021年,当立陶宛将跟踪行为定为刑事犯罪时,23个欧盟成员国已成功制定了反跟踪刑事立法。本文的另一个目的是讨论立陶宛引入反跟踪刑事立法的方式,并将立陶宛的做法与其他国家颁布的法律条款进行比较。作者得出结论,尽管立陶宛引入反跟踪刑事立法是确保受害者安全的重要一步,但在跟踪案件的刑事调查过程中,这仍可能导致一些实际问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Manipulation of sports competitions in the Lithuanian football: empirical research Peculiarities of consolidation of criminal penalties and the justice of the final sentence in the practice of Lithuanian courts Managing the risk of repeated violence against the intimate partner in probation service: Review of the practice in Lithuania and foreign countries Sexual harassment and abuse in sport: some legal and criminological considerations Certain Relevant Issues of Interviewing Minors and Victims in the Practice of Law Enforcement Institutions During Criminal Proceedings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1