After the Theological Turn? Editorial Introduction

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION Open Theology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1515/opth-2022-0216
M. Kočí
{"title":"After the Theological Turn? Editorial Introduction","authors":"M. Kočí","doi":"10.1515/opth-2022-0216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Nobody trusts theology and, in fact, for a very good reason;” John D. Caputo, one of the contributors to this special issue of Open Theology, once shocked the audience of theology students and professors at the Catholic University of Leuven. Caputo intended to criticize and challenge the partisan thought of theology which often result in self-referential debates without relevance, sometimes even without rational rigor, and almost all the time without credibility. However, there was also a bit of apologetics in Caputo’s statement: When theologians failed, philosophers are here and ready to take the initiative in exploring the fecundity of theological concepts. And indeed, despite certain forms of theology becoming less and less relevant, the questions of the late theological importance find their way back to the academic as well as public debates even stronger. The field of philosophy has experienced a return to the religious and some do not hesitate to talk directly about the theological turn. As a result, the discourse on religion, naming God, religious experience, faith, and so on, has undergone a great reversal. It is no more theologians who seek to employ the contemporary critical consciousness of philosophy to re-translate, re-read, re-interpret, and re-conceptualize Christianity to make it more comprehensible, more rational, and more attractive. Now, myriad philosophers, religious and secular philosophers alike, do not hesitate to draw inspiration from the sphere of religion and theology in order to interpret the structures of existence in the world. The motivations for such philosophical reconsiderations of religion vary, but a general perspective suggests that the religious allows for thinking excess, and exploring the impossible; religious thinking offers the possibility of criticizing metaphysics; it provides an alternative to modern objectivism and represents the other of autonomous reason. In short, religion appears as something beyond total control and mastery and yet the questions related to the religious give us much food for thought. Whatever the motivation, the result is obvious: we are confronted with de-localized Christian concepts and even de-theologized theologies that open new horizons for understanding. Perhaps the most interesting part of the whole movement is the audacious and spirited repetition of Christianity outside the exclusively defined ecclesial body. Nonetheless, there are still theologians among us; even theologians who take Caputo’s exclamation that “nobody trusts theology” seriously and who, at the same time, engage with the plethora of philosophical literature on the questions which used to be once the domain of their discipline. The trained eyes of a theologian cannot but see that the philosophical (re)turns to the religious provoke –whether they intend to or not – a radically renewed sense of theology; a sense which must be, however, uncovered and tested. This topical issue of Open Theology aims to explore, interrogate and reflect on how contemporary continental philosophy unfolds and advances the development of (new) philosophical theology. What does it mean to practice theology after the philosophical return to religion? What is the prospect for theology after the theological turn in philosophy?","PeriodicalId":42436,"journal":{"name":"Open Theology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2022-0216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Nobody trusts theology and, in fact, for a very good reason;” John D. Caputo, one of the contributors to this special issue of Open Theology, once shocked the audience of theology students and professors at the Catholic University of Leuven. Caputo intended to criticize and challenge the partisan thought of theology which often result in self-referential debates without relevance, sometimes even without rational rigor, and almost all the time without credibility. However, there was also a bit of apologetics in Caputo’s statement: When theologians failed, philosophers are here and ready to take the initiative in exploring the fecundity of theological concepts. And indeed, despite certain forms of theology becoming less and less relevant, the questions of the late theological importance find their way back to the academic as well as public debates even stronger. The field of philosophy has experienced a return to the religious and some do not hesitate to talk directly about the theological turn. As a result, the discourse on religion, naming God, religious experience, faith, and so on, has undergone a great reversal. It is no more theologians who seek to employ the contemporary critical consciousness of philosophy to re-translate, re-read, re-interpret, and re-conceptualize Christianity to make it more comprehensible, more rational, and more attractive. Now, myriad philosophers, religious and secular philosophers alike, do not hesitate to draw inspiration from the sphere of religion and theology in order to interpret the structures of existence in the world. The motivations for such philosophical reconsiderations of religion vary, but a general perspective suggests that the religious allows for thinking excess, and exploring the impossible; religious thinking offers the possibility of criticizing metaphysics; it provides an alternative to modern objectivism and represents the other of autonomous reason. In short, religion appears as something beyond total control and mastery and yet the questions related to the religious give us much food for thought. Whatever the motivation, the result is obvious: we are confronted with de-localized Christian concepts and even de-theologized theologies that open new horizons for understanding. Perhaps the most interesting part of the whole movement is the audacious and spirited repetition of Christianity outside the exclusively defined ecclesial body. Nonetheless, there are still theologians among us; even theologians who take Caputo’s exclamation that “nobody trusts theology” seriously and who, at the same time, engage with the plethora of philosophical literature on the questions which used to be once the domain of their discipline. The trained eyes of a theologian cannot but see that the philosophical (re)turns to the religious provoke –whether they intend to or not – a radically renewed sense of theology; a sense which must be, however, uncovered and tested. This topical issue of Open Theology aims to explore, interrogate and reflect on how contemporary continental philosophy unfolds and advances the development of (new) philosophical theology. What does it mean to practice theology after the philosophical return to religion? What is the prospect for theology after the theological turn in philosophy?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神学转向之后?编辑简介
“没有人相信神学,事实上,这是有充分理由的;”本期《开放神学》特刊的撰稿人之一约翰·D·卡普托曾震惊过鲁汶天主教大学的神学学生和教授。卡普托打算批评和挑战神学的党派思想,这种思想往往导致没有相关性的自我参照辩论,有时甚至没有理性的严谨性,几乎总是没有可信度。然而,卡普托的声明中也有一些辩护:当神学家失败时,哲学家们就在这里,并准备主动探索神学概念的丰富性。事实上,尽管某些形式的神学变得越来越不相关,但后期神学重要性的问题又回到了学术界和公众的辩论中,甚至更加激烈。哲学领域经历了宗教的回归,有些人毫不犹豫地直接谈论神学的转向。因此,关于宗教、命名上帝、宗教经历、信仰等的论述发生了巨大的逆转。神学家们不再试图利用当代哲学的批判意识来重新翻译、重读、重新解读和概念化基督教,使其更容易理解、更理性、更具吸引力。现在,无数哲学家,无论是宗教哲学家还是世俗哲学家,都毫不犹豫地从宗教和神学领域汲取灵感,以解释世界上存在的结构。对宗教进行这种哲学反思的动机各不相同,但从总体角度来看,宗教允许过度思考,探索不可能的事情;宗教思维提供了批判形而上学的可能性;它为现代客观主义提供了一种选择,代表了自主理性的另一种。简言之,宗教似乎是完全无法控制和掌握的东西,但与宗教有关的问题给了我们很多思考的食物。无论动机是什么,结果都是显而易见的:我们面临着去本地化的基督教概念,甚至是去神化的神学,它们为理解开辟了新的视野。也许整个运动中最有趣的部分是在专门定义的教会机构之外大胆而充满活力地重复基督教。尽管如此,我们当中仍然有神学家;即使是神学家,他们也认真对待卡普托的“没有人信任神学”的感叹,同时,他们也参与了大量关于曾经是他们学科领域的问题的哲学文献。神学家训练有素的眼睛不能不看到,哲学(重新)转向宗教激发了——无论他们是否有意——一种彻底更新的神学感;然而,这种感觉必须被揭露和检验。本期《开放神学》的主题是探索、质疑和反思当代大陆哲学如何展开和推动(新)哲学神学的发展。在哲学回归宗教之后,实践神学意味着什么?哲学神学转向后,神学的前景如何?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Theology
Open Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Theology is an international Open Access, peer-reviewed academic journal that welcomes contributions written in English addressing religion in its various forms and aspects: historical, theological, sociological, psychological, and other. The journal encompasses all major disciplines of Theology and Religious Studies, presenting doctrine, history, organization and everyday life of various types of religious groups and the relations between them. We publish articles from the field of Theology as well as Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology of Religion and also dialogue between Religion and Science. The Open Theology does not present views of any particular theological school nor of a particular religious organization. The contributions are written by researchers who represent different religious views. The authors present their research concerning the old religious traditions as well as new religious movements. The aim of the journal is to promote an international and interdisciplinary dialogue in the field of Theology and Religious Studies. The journal seeks also to provide researchers, pastors and other interested persons with the fruits of academic studies.
期刊最新文献
“Teachers of Good Things”: Origen on Women as Teachers Constructive After Systematic? On Doing Theology in South Africa Today Blood Lines: Biopolitics, Patriarchy, Myth A Militant Bride: Gender-Loaded Metaphors in Jerome’s Writings to Ascetic Men and Women “The Remedy for a World Without Transcendence”: Georges Bataille on Sacrifice and the Theology of Transgression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1