Is citizen satisfaction affected by the equivalent framing effect? A study based on situations involving poor government performance

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION International Review of Administrative Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI:10.1177/00208523231173128
Gao Xuede, Wang Qian, Shen Xiyun
{"title":"Is citizen satisfaction affected by the equivalent framing effect? A study based on situations involving poor government performance","authors":"Gao Xuede, Wang Qian, Shen Xiyun","doi":"10.1177/00208523231173128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although numerous studies have confirmed the existence and possible limitations of the equivalent framing effect in performance information evaluation, few studies have examined the conditions under which this framing effect works or does not work. This paper explores the equivalent framing effect of citizen satisfaction in the case of poor government performance by using two investigation experiments, and examines the boundary conditions of this effect in terms of performance information sources and trust in government. The results show that citizen satisfaction is higher when performance information is framed positively, rather than negatively. The findings demonstrate that the equivalent framing effect of citizen satisfaction is moderated by performance information sources and trust in government. This result indicates that equivalent framing effect has a certain fragility, showing heterogeneity with different sources of performance information and different levels of public trust in the government. Truthfully reporting poor performance is the basic requirement for local governments. This study reminds government staff that, on the one hand, low performance is not a scourge, and small changes in poor performance reports may significantly change citizen satisfaction. On the other hand, it is not a panacea to improve citizen satisfaction simply by changing the presentation of performance information. The government should make more efforts to improve the public's confidence in performance information and the government.","PeriodicalId":47811,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Administrative Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231173128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although numerous studies have confirmed the existence and possible limitations of the equivalent framing effect in performance information evaluation, few studies have examined the conditions under which this framing effect works or does not work. This paper explores the equivalent framing effect of citizen satisfaction in the case of poor government performance by using two investigation experiments, and examines the boundary conditions of this effect in terms of performance information sources and trust in government. The results show that citizen satisfaction is higher when performance information is framed positively, rather than negatively. The findings demonstrate that the equivalent framing effect of citizen satisfaction is moderated by performance information sources and trust in government. This result indicates that equivalent framing effect has a certain fragility, showing heterogeneity with different sources of performance information and different levels of public trust in the government. Truthfully reporting poor performance is the basic requirement for local governments. This study reminds government staff that, on the one hand, low performance is not a scourge, and small changes in poor performance reports may significantly change citizen satisfaction. On the other hand, it is not a panacea to improve citizen satisfaction simply by changing the presentation of performance information. The government should make more efforts to improve the public's confidence in performance information and the government.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公民满意度是否受到等效框架效应的影响?一项基于政府表现不佳的情况的研究
虽然大量的研究证实了等效框架效应在绩效信息评价中的存在和可能的局限性,但很少有研究考察这种框架效应在什么条件下起作用或不起作用。本文通过两个调查实验,探讨了政府绩效差情况下公民满意度的等效框架效应,并从绩效信息源和政府信任两个方面考察了这种效应的边界条件。结果表明,当绩效信息是积极的而不是消极的框架时,公民满意度更高。研究结果表明,绩效信息源和政府信任对公民满意度的等效框架效应有调节作用。这一结果表明,等效框架效应具有一定的脆弱性,在不同的绩效信息来源和不同的公众对政府的信任水平下呈现出异质性。如实报告政绩是对地方政府的基本要求。本研究提醒政府工作人员,一方面,低绩效不是祸害,低绩效报告的微小变化可能会显著改变公民满意度。另一方面,仅仅通过改变绩效信息的呈现方式来提高公民满意度并不是灵丹妙药。政府应该做出更多的努力来提高公众对绩效信息和政府的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: IRAS is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to academic and professional public administration. Founded in 1927 it is the oldest scholarly public administration journal specifically focused on comparative and international topics. IRAS seeks to shape the future agenda of public administration around the world by encouraging reflection on international comparisons, new techniques and approaches, the dialogue between academics and practitioners, and debates about the future of the field itself.
期刊最新文献
Is bureaucracy ironclad after all? Prevalence and variances of performance- and strategy-oriented management in German local governments A three-model approach to understand social media-mediated transparency in public administrations Board gender diversity in municipally owned corporations: A resource dependence perspective The autonomy and governance of mutual aid organizations for civil servants’ welfare Administrative reforms in Portugal and Spain: From bureaucracy to digital transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1