A residual performance methodology to evaluate multifunctional systems

Q1 Materials Science Multifunctional Materials Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1088/2399-7532/ab8e95
Wilhelm Johannisson, S. Nguyen, G. Lindbergh, D. Zenkert, E. Greenhalgh, M. Shaffer, A. Kucernak
{"title":"A residual performance methodology to evaluate multifunctional systems","authors":"Wilhelm Johannisson, S. Nguyen, G. Lindbergh, D. Zenkert, E. Greenhalgh, M. Shaffer, A. Kucernak","doi":"10.1088/2399-7532/ab8e95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of multifunctional materials and structures is receiving increasing interest for many applications and industries; it is a promising way to increase system-wide efficiency and improve the ability to meet environmental targets. However, quantifying the advantages of a multifunctional solution over monofunctional systems can be challenging. One approach is to calculate a reduction in mass, volume or other penalty function. Another approach is to use a multifunctional efficiency metric. However, either approach can lead to results that are unfamiliar or difficult to interpret and implement for an audience without a multifunctional materials or structures background. Instead, we introduce a comparative metric for multifunctional materials that correlates with familiar design parameters for monofunctional materials. This metric allows the potential benefits of the multifunctional system to be understood easily without needing a holistic viewpoint. The analysis is applied to two different examples of multifunctional systems; a structural battery and a structural supercapacitor, demonstrating the methodology and its potential for state-of-the-art structural power materials to offer a weight saving over conventional systems. This metric offers a new way to communicate research on structural power which could help identify and prioritise future research.","PeriodicalId":18949,"journal":{"name":"Multifunctional Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multifunctional Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-7532/ab8e95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The development of multifunctional materials and structures is receiving increasing interest for many applications and industries; it is a promising way to increase system-wide efficiency and improve the ability to meet environmental targets. However, quantifying the advantages of a multifunctional solution over monofunctional systems can be challenging. One approach is to calculate a reduction in mass, volume or other penalty function. Another approach is to use a multifunctional efficiency metric. However, either approach can lead to results that are unfamiliar or difficult to interpret and implement for an audience without a multifunctional materials or structures background. Instead, we introduce a comparative metric for multifunctional materials that correlates with familiar design parameters for monofunctional materials. This metric allows the potential benefits of the multifunctional system to be understood easily without needing a holistic viewpoint. The analysis is applied to two different examples of multifunctional systems; a structural battery and a structural supercapacitor, demonstrating the methodology and its potential for state-of-the-art structural power materials to offer a weight saving over conventional systems. This metric offers a new way to communicate research on structural power which could help identify and prioritise future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价多功能系统的剩余性能方法
多功能材料和结构的发展越来越受到许多应用和行业的关注;这是一种很有前途的方法,可以提高整个系统的效率,提高实现环境目标的能力。然而,量化多功能解决方案相对于单功能系统的优势可能具有挑战性。一种方法是计算质量、体积或其他惩罚函数的减少。另一种方法是使用多功能效率度量。然而,对于没有多功能材料或结构背景的观众来说,这两种方法都可能导致不熟悉或难以解释和实施的结果。相反,我们引入了多功能材料的比较度量,该度量与单功能材料的熟悉设计参数相关。这个度量可以让多功能系统的潜在好处很容易被理解,而不需要一个整体的观点。该分析应用于两个不同的多功能系统实例;一个结构电池和一个结构超级电容器,展示了该方法及其在最先进的结构动力材料方面的潜力,以减轻传统系统的重量。这一指标提供了一种沟通结构权力研究的新方法,有助于确定未来研究的优先顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Multifunctional Materials
Multifunctional Materials Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Sustainably Grown: The Underdog Robots of the Future Origami-patterned capacitor with programmed strain sensitivity Mechanical, electrochemical and multifunctional performance of a CFRP/carbon aerogel structural supercapacitor and its corresponding monofunctional equivalents Optically controlled grasping-slipping robot moving on tubular surfaces Encapsulation and on-demand release of functional materials from conductive nanofibers via electrical signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1