Dismantling a Monopoly: Jews, Christians, and the Production of Shofarot in Fifteenth-Century Germany

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Medieval Encounters Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI:10.1163/15700674-12340112
Andreas Lehnertz
{"title":"Dismantling a Monopoly: Jews, Christians, and the Production of Shofarot in Fifteenth-Century Germany","authors":"Andreas Lehnertz","doi":"10.1163/15700674-12340112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis essay presents a case study from Erfurt (Germany) concerning the production of shofarot (i.e., animal horns blown for ritual purposes, primarily on the Jewish New Year). By the early 1420s, Jews from all over the Holy Roman Empire had been purchasing shofarot from one Christian workshop in Erfurt that produced these ritual Jewish objects in cooperation with an unnamed Jewish craftsman. At the same time, two Jews from Erfurt were training in this craft, and started to produce shofarot of their own making. One of these Jewish craftsmen claimed that the Christian workshop had been deceiving the Jews for decades by providing improper shofarot made with materials unsuitable for Jewish ritual use. The local rabbi, Yomtov Lipman, exposed this as a scandal, writing letters to the German Jewish communities about the Christian workshop’s fraud and urging them all to buy new shofarot from the new Jewish craftsmen in Erfurt instead. This article will first examine the fraud attributed to the Christian workshop. Then, after analyzing the historical context of Yomtov Lipman’s letter, it will explore the underlying motivations of this rabbi to expose the Christian workshop’s fraud throughout German Jewish communities at this time. I will argue that, while Yomtov Lipman uses halakhic explanations in his letter, his chief motivation in exposing this fraud was to discredit the Christian workshop, create an artificial demand for shofarot, and promote the new Jewish workshop in Erfurt, whose craftsmen the rabbi himself had likely trained in the art of shofar making.","PeriodicalId":52521,"journal":{"name":"Medieval Encounters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medieval Encounters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700674-12340112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay presents a case study from Erfurt (Germany) concerning the production of shofarot (i.e., animal horns blown for ritual purposes, primarily on the Jewish New Year). By the early 1420s, Jews from all over the Holy Roman Empire had been purchasing shofarot from one Christian workshop in Erfurt that produced these ritual Jewish objects in cooperation with an unnamed Jewish craftsman. At the same time, two Jews from Erfurt were training in this craft, and started to produce shofarot of their own making. One of these Jewish craftsmen claimed that the Christian workshop had been deceiving the Jews for decades by providing improper shofarot made with materials unsuitable for Jewish ritual use. The local rabbi, Yomtov Lipman, exposed this as a scandal, writing letters to the German Jewish communities about the Christian workshop’s fraud and urging them all to buy new shofarot from the new Jewish craftsmen in Erfurt instead. This article will first examine the fraud attributed to the Christian workshop. Then, after analyzing the historical context of Yomtov Lipman’s letter, it will explore the underlying motivations of this rabbi to expose the Christian workshop’s fraud throughout German Jewish communities at this time. I will argue that, while Yomtov Lipman uses halakhic explanations in his letter, his chief motivation in exposing this fraud was to discredit the Christian workshop, create an artificial demand for shofarot, and promote the new Jewish workshop in Erfurt, whose craftsmen the rabbi himself had likely trained in the art of shofar making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《打破垄断:犹太人、基督徒和15世纪德国朔法罗的创作》
本文介绍了一个来自埃尔福特(德国)的关于shofarot(即为仪式目的吹响的动物角,主要是在犹太新年)生产的案例研究。在1420年代早期,来自神圣罗马帝国各地的犹太人一直在埃尔福特的一家基督教作坊购买羊角果,这家作坊与一位不知名的犹太工匠合作生产这些仪式用的犹太物品。与此同时,两个来自埃尔福特的犹太人正在接受这项工艺的培训,并开始制作他们自己制作的羊角果。其中一名犹太工匠声称,基督教作坊几十年来一直在欺骗犹太人,用不适合犹太人仪式的材料制作不合适的羊角。当地拉比约姆托夫·利普曼(Yomtov Lipman)揭露了这一丑闻,他写信给德国犹太人社区,指责基督教作坊的欺诈行为,并敦促他们都从埃尔福特的新犹太工匠那里购买新的羊角罗。本文将首先调查基督教工坊的欺诈行为。然后,在分析了Yomtov Lipman这封信的历史背景之后,它将探讨这位拉比揭露基督教工作坊在当时整个德国犹太社区的欺诈行为的潜在动机。我认为,虽然Yomtov Lipman在他的信中使用了halakhic的解释,但他揭露这种欺诈行为的主要动机是诋毁基督教作坊,人为地创造对羊角号的需求,并促进埃尔福特的新犹太作坊,拉比自己的工匠可能受过羊角号制作艺术的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medieval Encounters
Medieval Encounters Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Medieval Encounters promotes discussion and dialogue accross cultural, linguistic and disciplinary boundaries on the interactions of Jewish, Christian and Muslim cultures during the period from the fourth through to the sixteenth century C.E. Culture is defined in its widest form to include art, all manner of history, languages, literature, medicine, music, philosophy, religion and science. The geographic limits of inquiry will be bounded only by the limits in which the traditions interacted. Confluence, too, will be construed in its widest form to permit exploration of more indirect interactions and influences and to permit examination of important subjects on a comparative basis.
期刊最新文献
Ibn ʿĀʾisha: Matrilineal Kinship, Naming Practices, and the Poetics of Marwanid Matrilineality The Sufi Who Was a Sayyid: Muḥammad Ḥusaynī Gesūdarāz’s Assertions of Spiritual Authority Medieval Latin Lives of Muhammad, edited and translated by Julian Jolles and Jessica Weiss Ties of Kinship and Islamicate Societies: Introduction Epistolary Strategies of Negotiation: Reading a Fraternal Dispute at the Mughal Court, 1593–1594
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1