The Impact of Hematological Parameters on Pain Relief After Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection

Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2023.57614
S. Kaya
{"title":"The Impact of Hematological Parameters on Pain Relief After Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection","authors":"S. Kaya","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2023.57614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Since inflammation plays an important role in radiculopathies, and that neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratios (PLR) are known to be associated with inflammation, the effects of these values on transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy were investigated. Methods: A total of 101 patients, who were diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathy and underwent TFESI, were retrospectively analyzed. Therapeutic success was considered to be a ≥ 50% decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) scores one month after TFESI. The patients in the study were placed in two groups according to whether their treatment was successful or unsuccessful, according to this criteria, and hemogram parameters in the two groups were then compared. Results: The study included 46 female and 55 male patients with a mean age of 49.43 ± 13.29. The median duration of symptoms was 3.0 (3.0-8.0) months. It was found that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, platelet counts, mean plazma volümü (MPV), kırmızı hücre dağılım genişliği (RDW), platelet/ lenfosit oranı (PLR), sistemik inflamatuar indeks (SII), sedimentation, and C-reactive protein (CRP), although it was observed that there were significant increases in NLR in the successful group [2.34 (1.70-3.17)], as compared to the unsuccessful group [1.79 (1.51-2.57)] (p=0.026). Conclusion: Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is able to predict the response to TFESI treatment in patients with lumbar radiculopathy, in that patients with a higher NLR demonstrate a better response. Keywords: Hemogram parameters, inflammation, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar radiculopathy","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.57614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Since inflammation plays an important role in radiculopathies, and that neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratios (PLR) are known to be associated with inflammation, the effects of these values on transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy were investigated. Methods: A total of 101 patients, who were diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathy and underwent TFESI, were retrospectively analyzed. Therapeutic success was considered to be a ≥ 50% decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) scores one month after TFESI. The patients in the study were placed in two groups according to whether their treatment was successful or unsuccessful, according to this criteria, and hemogram parameters in the two groups were then compared. Results: The study included 46 female and 55 male patients with a mean age of 49.43 ± 13.29. The median duration of symptoms was 3.0 (3.0-8.0) months. It was found that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, platelet counts, mean plazma volümü (MPV), kırmızı hücre dağılım genişliği (RDW), platelet/ lenfosit oranı (PLR), sistemik inflamatuar indeks (SII), sedimentation, and C-reactive protein (CRP), although it was observed that there were significant increases in NLR in the successful group [2.34 (1.70-3.17)], as compared to the unsuccessful group [1.79 (1.51-2.57)] (p=0.026). Conclusion: Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is able to predict the response to TFESI treatment in patients with lumbar radiculopathy, in that patients with a higher NLR demonstrate a better response. Keywords: Hemogram parameters, inflammation, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar radiculopathy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射后血液学参数对疼痛缓解的影响
目的:由于炎症在神经根病中起着重要作用,并且已知中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)与炎症有关,因此研究了这些值对腰神经根病患者经孔硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)的影响。方法:对101例诊断为腰神经根病并行TFESI的患者进行回顾性分析。治疗成功被认为是TFESI后一个月视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分下降≥50%。根据这一标准,将研究中的患者根据治疗成功与否分为两组,然后比较两组的血象参数。结果:本研究包括46名女性和55名男性患者,平均年龄为49.43±13.29。症状的中位持续时间为3.0(3.0-8.0)个月。研究发现,两组在中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、单核细胞、血小板计数、平均血小板体积(MPV)、kırmızıhücre dağılım genişliği(RDW)、血小板/lenfosit oranı(PLR)、炎症指数(SII)、沉降和C反应蛋白(CRP)方面没有显著差异,尽管观察到与不成功组[1.79(1.51-2.57)]相比,成功组的NLR显著增加[2.34(1.70-3.17)](p=0.026)。结论:中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率能够预测腰神经根病患者对TFESI治疗的反应,因为NLR较高的患者表现出更好的反应。关键词:血象参数、炎症、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率、腰椎间盘突出症、腰椎神经根病
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1