Left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent oral anticoagulation.

Cardiology journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-15 DOI:10.5603/CJ.a2022.0054
Jarosław Karwowski, Jerzy Rekosz, Renata Mączyńska-Mazuruk, Anna Wiktorska, Karol Wrzosek, Wioletta Loska, Katarzyna Szmarowska, Mateusz Solecki, Joanna Sumińska-Syska, Mirosław Dłużniewski
{"title":"Left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent oral anticoagulation.","authors":"Jarosław Karwowski, Jerzy Rekosz, Renata Mączyńska-Mazuruk, Anna Wiktorska, Karol Wrzosek, Wioletta Loska, Katarzyna Szmarowska, Mateusz Solecki, Joanna Sumińska-Syska, Mirosław Dłużniewski","doi":"10.5603/CJ.a2022.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electric cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of embolism, with embolic material existing in the heart cavities. The initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy reduces the risk of thromboembolic events. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi in non-valvular AF, to compare vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with respect to thrombus prevalence, and to evaluate the rate of LAA thrombus persistence on repeat transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after treatment change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 160 consecutive AF patients who presented with an AF duration > 48 h and had undergone TEE before cardioversion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Left atrial appendage thrombus was observed in 12 (7.5%) patients, and spontaneous echo contrast 4 was observed in 19 (11.8%) patients; the incidence was similar between the NOAC and VKA groups (8.9% vs. 3.6% and 12.4% vs. 18.5 %, respectively). Among patients on NOAC, thrombus prevalence was detected in 8.4% of users of rivaroxaban, 8% of users of dabigatran, and 12.5% of users of apixaban.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LAA thrombus developed in 7.5% of patients despite anticoagulation therapy, demonstrating similar prevalence rates among patients either on NOAC or VKA. Lower mean LAA flow velocity and a history of vascular disease were independent predictors of embolic material in the LAA. It seems that in the case of embolic materials in LAA under NOAC treatment, switching to VKA provides additional clinical benefit to the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2022.0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electric cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of embolism, with embolic material existing in the heart cavities. The initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy reduces the risk of thromboembolic events. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi in non-valvular AF, to compare vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with respect to thrombus prevalence, and to evaluate the rate of LAA thrombus persistence on repeat transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after treatment change.

Methods: We enrolled 160 consecutive AF patients who presented with an AF duration > 48 h and had undergone TEE before cardioversion.

Results: Left atrial appendage thrombus was observed in 12 (7.5%) patients, and spontaneous echo contrast 4 was observed in 19 (11.8%) patients; the incidence was similar between the NOAC and VKA groups (8.9% vs. 3.6% and 12.4% vs. 18.5 %, respectively). Among patients on NOAC, thrombus prevalence was detected in 8.4% of users of rivaroxaban, 8% of users of dabigatran, and 12.5% of users of apixaban.

Conclusions: The LAA thrombus developed in 7.5% of patients despite anticoagulation therapy, demonstrating similar prevalence rates among patients either on NOAC or VKA. Lower mean LAA flow velocity and a history of vascular disease were independent predictors of embolic material in the LAA. It seems that in the case of embolic materials in LAA under NOAC treatment, switching to VKA provides additional clinical benefit to the patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服抗凝治疗心房颤动患者左心房附件血栓的发生。
背景心房颤动(AF)的电复律与栓塞风险增加有关,栓塞物质存在于心腔内。开始口服抗凝治疗可降低血栓栓塞事件的风险。本研究的目的是评估非瓣膜性房颤患者左心耳(LAA)血栓的发生率,比较维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)和非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOACs)的血栓发生率,并评估治疗改变后重复经食管超声心动图(TEE)左心耳血栓持续率。方法我们招募了160名连续的房颤患者,这些患者的房颤持续时间>48小时,并在复律前接受了TEE。结果左心耳血栓12例(7.5%),自发回声造影4例(11.8%);NOAC组和VKA组的发病率相似(分别为8.9%对3.6%和12.4%对18.5%)。在NOAC患者中,8.4%的利伐沙班使用者、8%的达比加群使用者和12.5%的阿哌沙班使用者检测到血栓患病率。结论7.5%的患者尽管接受了抗凝治疗,但仍出现了左心耳血栓,表明NOAC或VKA患者的发病率相似。左心耳平均流速较低和有血管病史是左心耳栓塞物质的独立预测因素。似乎在NOAC治疗下左心耳栓塞材料的情况下,改用VKA为患者提供了额外的临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A real-life clinical application of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocarditis - one-center observational retrospective study. Cardiovascular sequelae in symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection survivors. Pregabalin and gabapentin-induced heart failure. A comparison of the management and five-year outcomes of patients treated for chronic coronary syndrome between 2006-2007 and 2015-2016 - insights from the PRESAGE registry. Effect of alcohol abuse on selected markers of inflammation, hemostasis, and endothelial function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1