Umair Iqbal, Z. Ahmed, Hafsa Anwar, Nihit M. Shah, Wade M. Lee, A. Nawras, H. Khara, Aijaz Ahmed, S. Khurana
{"title":"Hemorrhagic Ascites Is Associated With Reduced Survival in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Umair Iqbal, Z. Ahmed, Hafsa Anwar, Nihit M. Shah, Wade M. Lee, A. Nawras, H. Khara, Aijaz Ahmed, S. Khurana","doi":"10.14740/gr1485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Hemorrhagic ascites is characterized as red blood cell count greater than 10,000/mm3. In cirrhosis, ascites is an event of decompensation, and associated with poor prognosis. However, significance of hemorrhagic ascites is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the significance of hemorrhagic ascites in cirrhotic patients. Methods We conducted a systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry, and Web of Science Core Collection to identify studies till March 2021, which, in patients with cirrhosis, compared outcomes amongst those with hemorrhagic ascites to those with non-hemorrhagic ascites. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality, and secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Results Four studies, with 2,058 cirrhosis patients, were included. Among these, 1,488 patients had non-hemorrhagic ascites and 570 had hemorrhagic ascites. We observed no significant differences in AKI (odds ratio (OR) = 2.55; confidence interval (CI): 0.58 - 11.24), HE (OR = 2.52; CI: 0.70 - 9.05), SBP (OR = 1.66; CI: 0.12 - 22.83) and PVT (OR = 0.99; CI: 0.71 - 1.39). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly higher in patients with hemorrhagic ascites compared to those with non-hemorrhagic ascites (OR = 1.79; CI: 1.37 - 2.36; I2 = 56%). Pooled 3-year mortality was significantly higher in those with hemorrhagic (72.5% (CI: 68.2-76.4%)) when compared to non-hemorrhagic ascites (57.9% (CI: 55.2-60.6%)) (OR = 2.17; CI: 1.71 - 2.74) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 15%). Conclusions In patients with cirrhosis, hemorrhagic ascites is a poor prognostic marker, which is associated with increased ICU stay and mortality. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate significance of hemorrhagic ascites in patients with cirrhosis.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"26 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background Hemorrhagic ascites is characterized as red blood cell count greater than 10,000/mm3. In cirrhosis, ascites is an event of decompensation, and associated with poor prognosis. However, significance of hemorrhagic ascites is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the significance of hemorrhagic ascites in cirrhotic patients. Methods We conducted a systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry, and Web of Science Core Collection to identify studies till March 2021, which, in patients with cirrhosis, compared outcomes amongst those with hemorrhagic ascites to those with non-hemorrhagic ascites. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality, and secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Results Four studies, with 2,058 cirrhosis patients, were included. Among these, 1,488 patients had non-hemorrhagic ascites and 570 had hemorrhagic ascites. We observed no significant differences in AKI (odds ratio (OR) = 2.55; confidence interval (CI): 0.58 - 11.24), HE (OR = 2.52; CI: 0.70 - 9.05), SBP (OR = 1.66; CI: 0.12 - 22.83) and PVT (OR = 0.99; CI: 0.71 - 1.39). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly higher in patients with hemorrhagic ascites compared to those with non-hemorrhagic ascites (OR = 1.79; CI: 1.37 - 2.36; I2 = 56%). Pooled 3-year mortality was significantly higher in those with hemorrhagic (72.5% (CI: 68.2-76.4%)) when compared to non-hemorrhagic ascites (57.9% (CI: 55.2-60.6%)) (OR = 2.17; CI: 1.71 - 2.74) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 15%). Conclusions In patients with cirrhosis, hemorrhagic ascites is a poor prognostic marker, which is associated with increased ICU stay and mortality. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate significance of hemorrhagic ascites in patients with cirrhosis.
背景出血性腹水的特征是红细胞计数大于10000/mm3。在肝硬化中,腹水是一种失代偿事件,与预后不良有关。然而,出血性腹水的意义尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估肝硬化患者出血性腹水的意义。方法我们在Embase、MEDLINE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心、世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)国际临床试验注册中心和Web of Science核心集合中进行了系统检索,以确定截至2021年3月的研究,这些研究在肝硬化患者中比较了出血性腹水患者和非出血性腹水的结果。主要转归为3年死亡率,次要转归为急性肾损伤(AKI)、肝性脑病(HE)、自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)和门静脉血栓形成(PVT)。结果纳入4项研究,共2058例肝硬化患者。其中1488例为非出血性腹水,570例为出血性腹水。我们没有观察到AKI的显著差异(比值比(OR)=2.55;置信区间(CI):0.58-11.24)、HE(OR=2.52;CI:0.70-9.05)、SBP(OR=1.66;CI:0.12-22.83)和PVT(OR=0.99;CI:0.71-1.39)。出血性腹水患者的重症监护室(ICU)住院时间明显高于非出血性腹水(OR=1.79;CI:1.37-2.36;I2=56%)。出血性腹水患者的合并3年死亡率(72.5%(CI:68.2-76.4%))显著高于非出血性腹水(57.9%(CI:55.2-60.6%))(OR=2.17;CI:1.71-2.74)和低异质性(I2=15%)。结论在肝硬化患者中,出血性腹水是一个不良的预后标志,它与ICU住院时间和死亡率的增加有关。需要进行前瞻性研究来进一步评估肝硬化患者出血性腹水的意义。