Childbirth in Bhutan: A study on the use of neuraxial analgesia for labor pain.

Public health challenges Pub Date : 2023-03-07 eCollection Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1002/puh2.73
Tenzin Yoezer, Dawa Gyeltshen, Jampel Tshering
{"title":"Childbirth in Bhutan: A study on the use of neuraxial analgesia for labor pain.","authors":"Tenzin Yoezer, Dawa Gyeltshen, Jampel Tshering","doi":"10.1002/puh2.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The practice of neuraxial labor analgesia (NLA) as a mode of pain relief was introduced in Bhutan in 2016 despite it being in practice for more than five decades. There is a lack of data on NLA in Bhutan. Therefore, this study describes the use of NLA and its outcome over 4 years in Bhutan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. The data were obtained from the Anesthesia Department, medical records, admission forms, and birth-registers. A total of 524 women were included. Data were recorded using 2021 Microsoft Excel version 16.57 (22011101) and analyzed using Epi Info 7.2.5.0. Categorical data were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Continuous data were summarized using mean and standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of NLA usage was 3.5% (524/15,119). Most women were between 21 and 30 years (67.2%). Modes of delivery following NLA were spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean section, and assisted vaginal delivery 63.4%, 18.4%, and 18.3%, respectively. Non-reassuring fetal status (37.5%) and failed progression of labor (36.5%) were the leading indications of cesarean section. The primary reason for assisted vaginal delivery was poor maternal effort (55.2%). Neonates of the mother who received neuraxial analgesia had neonatal jaundice in 8%, neonatal intensive care unit admission in 0.76%, and Apgar score less than 7 in 5.1% and 0.2% at 1 and 5-min, respectively, after birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although NLA is safe for both mothers and babies, its use is low in Bhutan. The probable reason for the low incidence could be a shortage of anesthesiologists, cultural beliefs, and lack of awareness. The Ministry of Health and the Department of Anesthesia should work together to improve the service.</p>","PeriodicalId":74613,"journal":{"name":"Public health challenges","volume":" ","pages":"e73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The practice of neuraxial labor analgesia (NLA) as a mode of pain relief was introduced in Bhutan in 2016 despite it being in practice for more than five decades. There is a lack of data on NLA in Bhutan. Therefore, this study describes the use of NLA and its outcome over 4 years in Bhutan.

Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. The data were obtained from the Anesthesia Department, medical records, admission forms, and birth-registers. A total of 524 women were included. Data were recorded using 2021 Microsoft Excel version 16.57 (22011101) and analyzed using Epi Info 7.2.5.0. Categorical data were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Continuous data were summarized using mean and standard deviation.

Results: The incidence of NLA usage was 3.5% (524/15,119). Most women were between 21 and 30 years (67.2%). Modes of delivery following NLA were spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean section, and assisted vaginal delivery 63.4%, 18.4%, and 18.3%, respectively. Non-reassuring fetal status (37.5%) and failed progression of labor (36.5%) were the leading indications of cesarean section. The primary reason for assisted vaginal delivery was poor maternal effort (55.2%). Neonates of the mother who received neuraxial analgesia had neonatal jaundice in 8%, neonatal intensive care unit admission in 0.76%, and Apgar score less than 7 in 5.1% and 0.2% at 1 and 5-min, respectively, after birth.

Conclusion: Although NLA is safe for both mothers and babies, its use is low in Bhutan. The probable reason for the low incidence could be a shortage of anesthesiologists, cultural beliefs, and lack of awareness. The Ministry of Health and the Department of Anesthesia should work together to improve the service.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不丹分娩:使用神经轴镇痛治疗分娩疼痛的研究
背景:神经轴分娩镇痛(NLA)作为一种镇痛方式于2016年在不丹引入,尽管它已经实践了50多年。不丹缺乏NLA的数据。因此,本研究描述了不丹4年来NLA的使用及其结果。方法:2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日进行回顾性描述性研究。数据来源于麻醉科、病历、住院表和出生登记簿。总共包括524名妇女。使用2021 Microsoft Excel version 16.57(22011101)记录数据,使用Epi Info 7.2.5.0进行分析。分类数据用频率和百分比进行汇总。用均值和标准差对连续数据进行汇总。结果:NLA使用率为3.5%(524/15,119)。大多数妇女年龄在21至30岁之间(67.2%)。分娩方式分别为自然阴道分娩、剖宫产和辅助阴道分娩,分别占63.4%、18.4%和18.3%。胎儿状态不稳定(37.5%)和产程失败(36.5%)是剖宫产的主要指征。辅助阴道分娩的主要原因是产妇努力不足(55.2%)。接受轴向镇痛的母亲的新生儿在出生后1 min和5 min出现新生儿黄疸的占8%,进入新生儿重症监护病房的占0.76%,Apgar评分低于7分的分别占5.1%和0.2%。结论:虽然NLA对母亲和婴儿都是安全的,但它在不丹的使用率很低。发生率低的原因可能是缺少麻醉医师、文化信仰和缺乏意识。卫生部和麻醉科应共同努力,提高服务水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Family Planning Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Male and Female Garment Factory Workers in Alexandria, Egypt. Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes of Undergraduate Students on Trichomoniasis in Ghana. A Qualitative Exploration of the Lived Experience of Menopause Among Black Women in the United Kingdom. Afghanistan's Silent Epidemic: The Overuse of Antibiotics Is Fueling a Public Health Crisis. Strengthening Critical Health Infrastructure-One Road to Climate Resilience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1