Performance Comparison of Similarity Measure Algorithm as Data Preprocessing Stage: Text Normalization in Bahasa

Achmad Yohni Wahyu Finansyah, Fnu Afiahayati, Vincent Michael Sutanto
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Similarity Measure Algorithm as Data Preprocessing Stage: Text Normalization in Bahasa","authors":"Achmad Yohni Wahyu Finansyah, Fnu Afiahayati, Vincent Michael Sutanto","doi":"10.15294/sji.v9i1.30052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: More and more data are stored in text form due to technological developments, making text data processing more difficult. It also causes problems in the text preprocessing algorithm, one of which is when two texts are identical, but are considered distinct by the algorithm. Therefore, it is necessary to normalize the text to get the standard form of words in a particular language. Spelling correction is often used to normalize text, but for Bahasa Indonesia, there has not been much research on the spell correction algorithm. Thus, there needs to be a comparison of the most appropriate spelling correction algorithms for the normalization process to be effective.Methods: In this study, we compared three algorithms, namely Levenshtein Distance, Jaro-Winkler Distance, and Smith-Waterman. These algorithms were evaluated using questionnaire data and tweet data, which both are in Bahasa Indonesia.Result: The fastest normalization time is obtained by the Jaro-Winkler, taking an average of 31.01 seconds for questionnaire data and 59.27 seconds for tweet data. The best accuracy is obtained by the Levenshtein Distance with a value of 44.90% for the questionnaire data and 60.04% for the tweet data. Novelty: The novelty of this research is to compare the similarity measure algorithm in Bahasa Indonesia. Therefore, the most suitable similarity measure algorithm for Bahasa Indonesia will be obtained.","PeriodicalId":30781,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v9i1.30052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: More and more data are stored in text form due to technological developments, making text data processing more difficult. It also causes problems in the text preprocessing algorithm, one of which is when two texts are identical, but are considered distinct by the algorithm. Therefore, it is necessary to normalize the text to get the standard form of words in a particular language. Spelling correction is often used to normalize text, but for Bahasa Indonesia, there has not been much research on the spell correction algorithm. Thus, there needs to be a comparison of the most appropriate spelling correction algorithms for the normalization process to be effective.Methods: In this study, we compared three algorithms, namely Levenshtein Distance, Jaro-Winkler Distance, and Smith-Waterman. These algorithms were evaluated using questionnaire data and tweet data, which both are in Bahasa Indonesia.Result: The fastest normalization time is obtained by the Jaro-Winkler, taking an average of 31.01 seconds for questionnaire data and 59.27 seconds for tweet data. The best accuracy is obtained by the Levenshtein Distance with a value of 44.90% for the questionnaire data and 60.04% for the tweet data. Novelty: The novelty of this research is to compare the similarity measure algorithm in Bahasa Indonesia. Therefore, the most suitable similarity measure algorithm for Bahasa Indonesia will be obtained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相似度度量算法在数据预处理阶段的性能比较:马来文文本归一化
用途:由于技术的发展,越来越多的数据以文本形式存储,这给文本数据的处理增加了难度。这也会给文本预处理算法带来问题,其中一个问题是当两个文本相同,但被算法认为是不同的。因此,有必要对文本进行规范化,以获得特定语言中单词的标准形式。拼写校正通常用于文本规范化,但对于印尼语,拼写校正算法的研究并不多。因此,需要对最合适的拼写纠正算法进行比较,以使规范化过程有效。方法:本研究比较了Levenshtein Distance、Jaro-Winkler Distance和Smith-Waterman三种算法。这些算法使用问卷数据和推特数据进行评估,这两种数据都是印尼语。结果:Jaro-Winkler归一化时间最快,问卷数据平均为31.01秒,tweet数据平均为59.27秒。Levenshtein Distance的准确率最高,问卷数据的准确率为44.90%,tweet数据的准确率为60.04%。新颖性:本研究的新颖性在于比较印尼语的相似度度量算法。从而得到最适合印尼语的相似度度量算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Random Forest and Double Random Forest Models from View Points of Their Interpretability Comparative Analysis of LSTM Neural Network and SVM for USD Exchange Rate Prediction: A Study on Different Training Data Scenarios Knowledge Discovery from Confusion Matrix of Pruned CART in Imbalanced Microarray Data Ovarian Cancer Classification Comparison of Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machine on Mixed Categorical and Continuous Independent Variables for COVID-19 Patients Data The Comparison of K-Nearest Neighbors and Random Forest Algorithm to Recognize Indonesian Sign Language in a Real-Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1