An investigation of the association of grit with performance in accounting courses

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Accounting Education Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100779
Jeremy M. Vinson, Jeffrey J. McMillan, Lydia F. Schleifer
{"title":"An investigation of the association of grit with performance in accounting courses","authors":"Jeremy M. Vinson,&nbsp;Jeffrey J. McMillan,&nbsp;Lydia F. Schleifer","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Grit has become a buzzword in business, with academic research and popular press purporting that grit may be a better determinant of success than even talent or IQ. The contention is that the greater an individual’s “grittiness” the better their ability to work strenuously toward challenges and to maintain effort and interest over time, which results in success. Accounting courses are broadly considered to be difficult courses and a type where students’ grit would likely aid performance. We investigate whether grit is associated with academic performance in accounting courses, while controlling for learning strategies and motivation. Using survey data from multiple courses throughout the accounting curriculum, we find that grit is positively associated with both short-term and long-term academic performance, although the strength of association varies among the grit measures. Our results suggest instructors should consider grit as a trait positively associated with performance in accounting courses and highlights three popular measures available for assessing grit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575122000136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Grit has become a buzzword in business, with academic research and popular press purporting that grit may be a better determinant of success than even talent or IQ. The contention is that the greater an individual’s “grittiness” the better their ability to work strenuously toward challenges and to maintain effort and interest over time, which results in success. Accounting courses are broadly considered to be difficult courses and a type where students’ grit would likely aid performance. We investigate whether grit is associated with academic performance in accounting courses, while controlling for learning strategies and motivation. Using survey data from multiple courses throughout the accounting curriculum, we find that grit is positively associated with both short-term and long-term academic performance, although the strength of association varies among the grit measures. Our results suggest instructors should consider grit as a trait positively associated with performance in accounting courses and highlights three popular measures available for assessing grit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
毅力与会计课程成绩关系的调查
毅力已经成为商界的一个流行词,学术研究和大众媒体都声称,毅力可能是比天赋或智商更能决定成功的因素。其论点是,一个人的“坚韧不拔”越强,他就越有能力努力应对挑战,并长期保持努力和兴趣,从而取得成功。会计课程被广泛认为是很难的课程,学生的毅力可能会帮助他们取得成绩。在控制学习策略和动机的情况下,我们调查毅力是否与会计课程的学习成绩有关。通过对会计课程中多个课程的调查数据,我们发现毅力与短期和长期的学习成绩都呈正相关,尽管不同的毅力测量指标之间的关联强度有所不同。我们的研究结果表明,教师应该将毅力视为一种与会计课程成绩呈正相关的特质,并强调了评估毅力的三种常用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
期刊最新文献
How a color-based teaching method has lifted grades for first-year accounting students Workbook design and controls: A framework Examining the contribution of diverse feedback perspectives during a work-integrated learning intervention Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1