Evaluation of Estimated Survey Duration Equations Using a Health Risk Assessment

IF 0.9 2区 社会学 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS Survey Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-08-10 DOI:10.18148/SRM/2021.V15I2.7800
Brittany U Carter, James Bennett, Elric Sims
{"title":"Evaluation of Estimated Survey Duration Equations Using a Health Risk Assessment","authors":"Brittany U Carter, James Bennett, Elric Sims","doi":"10.18148/SRM/2021.V15I2.7800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Survey duration—the time it takes to complete a survey—affects response and completion rates. Estimated survey duration equations may be used to estimate survey duration, however, there are no studies assessing their use. The objective of this study is to evaluate estimated survey duration equations using a health risk assessment. Six existing estimated survey duration equations were identified. Using health risk assessment data from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018, an average participant profile was built to inform the inputs into the estimated survey duration equations. Estimated survey duration of the health risk assessment ranged from 7.64 minutes to 39.6 minutes. Using the same dataset, the estimated survey duration was compared to the actual completion time of the health risk assessment. The average completion time of the health risk assessment was 11.27 minutes. The estimated survey duration equations either under- or overestimated the completion time of the health risk assessment. The equation that is based on word count, number of questions, decisions, and open text boxes is recommended for use to estimate the duration of a health risk assessment although it was an overestimate. Using estimated survey duration equations appear to be a suitable alternative to pilot testing but future studies are needed to further evaluate these equations in other types of surveys.","PeriodicalId":46454,"journal":{"name":"Survey Research Methods","volume":"15 1","pages":"187-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18148/SRM/2021.V15I2.7800","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Survey duration—the time it takes to complete a survey—affects response and completion rates. Estimated survey duration equations may be used to estimate survey duration, however, there are no studies assessing their use. The objective of this study is to evaluate estimated survey duration equations using a health risk assessment. Six existing estimated survey duration equations were identified. Using health risk assessment data from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018, an average participant profile was built to inform the inputs into the estimated survey duration equations. Estimated survey duration of the health risk assessment ranged from 7.64 minutes to 39.6 minutes. Using the same dataset, the estimated survey duration was compared to the actual completion time of the health risk assessment. The average completion time of the health risk assessment was 11.27 minutes. The estimated survey duration equations either under- or overestimated the completion time of the health risk assessment. The equation that is based on word count, number of questions, decisions, and open text boxes is recommended for use to estimate the duration of a health risk assessment although it was an overestimate. Using estimated survey duration equations appear to be a suitable alternative to pilot testing but future studies are needed to further evaluate these equations in other types of surveys.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用健康风险评估评估估计调查持续时间方程
调查持续时间(完成调查所需的时间)会影响响应和完成率。估计调查持续时间方程可用于估计调查持续时间,然而,没有研究评估其使用情况。本研究的目的是利用健康风险评估来评估估计的调查持续时间方程。确定了六个现有的估计调查持续时间方程。利用2018年1月1日至2018年12月31日的健康风险评估数据,建立了平均参与者资料,为估计调查持续时间方程的输入提供信息。健康风险评估的估计调查时间从7.64分钟到39.6分钟不等。使用相同的数据集,将估计的调查持续时间与健康风险评估的实际完成时间进行比较。健康风险评估的平均完成时间为11.27分钟。估计的调查持续时间方程低估或高估了健康风险评估的完成时间。建议使用基于字数、问题数量、决定和打开的文本框的公式来估计健康风险评估的持续时间,尽管这是高估。使用估计调查持续时间方程似乎是替代试点测试的合适方法,但需要进一步研究在其他类型的调查中进一步评价这些方程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Survey Research Methods
Survey Research Methods SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transitioning to a Mixed-Mode Study Design in a National Household Panel Study: Effects on Fieldwork Outcomes, Sample Composition and Costs. Impact of Mode Switching on Nonresponse and Bias in a Multimode Longitudinal Study of Young Adults. Horizontal Stratification in Higher Education and Differentiation of Young Adults’ Labor Market Outcomes: Differences by College Selectivity, Fields of Study, and Gender and Their Trends The Effect of Participation to School Career Programs on Types of Career Maturity and Leisure Activities for Undergraduate: Application of Dual Latent Profile Analysis Work-related experiences and happiness of young adult women during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining the moderating effects of social relationships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1