Researching ‘Faith’ Beyond the Congregation: Testing Terminology in a Pilot Project

Q2 Arts and Humanities Ecclesial Practices Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI:10.1163/22144471-bja10043
F. Porter, Ian Jones
{"title":"Researching ‘Faith’ Beyond the Congregation: Testing Terminology in a Pilot Project","authors":"F. Porter, Ian Jones","doi":"10.1163/22144471-bja10043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBased upon the experience of an empirical pilot project, this article considers methodological challenges and opportunities involved in researching the faith of people not attached to church congregations, but participating in a church-based initiative. Is it possible to find out what ‘faith’ is for these people, without imposing overtly religious – or non-religious – understandings of ‘faith’? Having situated our work within the research landscape concerning faith, belief and non-belief, we introduce our definition of ‘faith’, drawing upon (but also in places critiquing) Abby Day’s work on investigating ‘belief’ and David Gortner’s research on worldview and ‘personal theology’. Supported by the project’s process and findings, we argue that our approach offers a framework which takes seriously Day’s concern to understand interviewees’ ‘belief’ on its own terms whilst also offering a way of inviting them to evaluate the Christianity they encountered through contact with a local church.","PeriodicalId":37169,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesial Practices","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecclesial Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22144471-bja10043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based upon the experience of an empirical pilot project, this article considers methodological challenges and opportunities involved in researching the faith of people not attached to church congregations, but participating in a church-based initiative. Is it possible to find out what ‘faith’ is for these people, without imposing overtly religious – or non-religious – understandings of ‘faith’? Having situated our work within the research landscape concerning faith, belief and non-belief, we introduce our definition of ‘faith’, drawing upon (but also in places critiquing) Abby Day’s work on investigating ‘belief’ and David Gortner’s research on worldview and ‘personal theology’. Supported by the project’s process and findings, we argue that our approach offers a framework which takes seriously Day’s concern to understand interviewees’ ‘belief’ on its own terms whilst also offering a way of inviting them to evaluate the Christianity they encountered through contact with a local church.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究会众之外的“信仰”:在试点项目中测试术语
基于一个实证试点项目的经验,本文考虑了研究不隶属于教会会众但参与基于教会的倡议的人的信仰所涉及的方法学挑战和机遇。在不强加对“信仰”的公开宗教或非宗教理解的情况下,有可能找出这些人的“信仰”是什么吗?在将我们的工作置于关于信仰、信仰和非信仰的研究领域后,我们引入了我们对“信仰”的定义,借鉴(但也在批评)Abby Day关于调查“信仰”和David Gortner关于世界观和“个人神学”的研究。在该项目的过程和调查结果的支持下,我们认为,我们的方法提供了一个框架,认真对待戴的关注,以了解受访者的“信仰”,同时也提供了一种邀请他们通过与当地教会接触来评估他们所遇到的基督教的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecclesial Practices
Ecclesial Practices Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Is Qualitative Research the Best or Only Way to Study Lived Theology? ‘Give the Grant Money to the Youth’: From Youth Departure to Belonging in the Ethnic Church Practicing Reflexivity at the American Academy of Religion Qualitative Research in Theology. A Spiritual Turn? Ethno-Apophasis: An Ethnographic Theology of Thinness and Refusal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1