From objects of study to worldmaking beings: The history of botany at the corner of the plant turn

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY History Compass Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1111/hic3.12782
Kathleen Cruz Gutierrez
{"title":"From objects of study to worldmaking beings: The history of botany at the corner of the plant turn","authors":"Kathleen Cruz Gutierrez","doi":"10.1111/hic3.12782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The “plant turn” of recent years has surfaced as an interdisciplinary position that sees plants as more than inert, passive objects subject to the whims of humans and of more charismatic animal life. Recent research in STEM, the social sciences, and the humanities, alongside scholarly publishing pursuits, have opened a field in which a small yet expanding community of scholars are proposing the worldmaking and agential capacities of plants. While the field of environmental history has already spent decades centering vegetal life and its profound impact on human societies, this essay considers what the plant turn might look like for the history of science and more specifically, the history of botany. What might it mean for plants to transform from objects of study to worldmaking beings in histories of the science? Drawing on two brief historical case studies from the Philippines, the essay invites consideration of plant worldmaking, understood in tandem with alternative ontologies, and of theorizing with plants. Though it may be much too soon to draw conclusions about what the plant turn may portend for the history of science (and the writing that may come from it), historians may have something to offer the plant turn—in discipline and method—in order to make this promising bed of scholarship rigorous and accessible.</p>","PeriodicalId":46376,"journal":{"name":"History Compass","volume":"21 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hic3.12782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The “plant turn” of recent years has surfaced as an interdisciplinary position that sees plants as more than inert, passive objects subject to the whims of humans and of more charismatic animal life. Recent research in STEM, the social sciences, and the humanities, alongside scholarly publishing pursuits, have opened a field in which a small yet expanding community of scholars are proposing the worldmaking and agential capacities of plants. While the field of environmental history has already spent decades centering vegetal life and its profound impact on human societies, this essay considers what the plant turn might look like for the history of science and more specifically, the history of botany. What might it mean for plants to transform from objects of study to worldmaking beings in histories of the science? Drawing on two brief historical case studies from the Philippines, the essay invites consideration of plant worldmaking, understood in tandem with alternative ontologies, and of theorizing with plants. Though it may be much too soon to draw conclusions about what the plant turn may portend for the history of science (and the writing that may come from it), historians may have something to offer the plant turn—in discipline and method—in order to make this promising bed of scholarship rigorous and accessible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从研究对象到创造世界的生物:植物转折之处的植物学历史
近年来,“植物转向”作为一种跨学科的立场浮出水面,它认为植物不仅仅是惰性的、被动的物体,受制于人类和更有魅力的动物生命。最近在STEM、社会科学和人文科学领域的研究,以及学术出版领域的追求,开辟了一个领域,在这个领域,一个小而不断扩大的学者群体正在提出植物的世界创造和代理能力。虽然环境史领域已经花了几十年的时间来关注植物生命及其对人类社会的深远影响,但本文考虑的是植物的转变对科学史,更具体地说,是植物学史的影响。在科学史上,植物从研究对象转变为创造世界的生物可能意味着什么?从菲律宾的两个简短的历史案例研究中,本文邀请考虑植物世界的形成,与替代本体论一起理解,并与植物理论化。虽然现在就得出关于植物转折对科学史(以及由此产生的著作)的预示的结论可能还为时过早,但历史学家可能会为植物转折提供一些纪律和方法,以便使这个有前途的学术温床变得严谨和容易理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History Compass
History Compass HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Issue Information ‘Temples Devoted to Cold Coffee and Hot Sex’: Coffee Bars and Youth Culture in Postwar Britain Issue Information Australasian Histories of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean World Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1