How Engagement with Mathematics in an Integrated STEM Lesson Evolved over Four Years

Mollie H. Appelgate, Kari Jurgenson
{"title":"How Engagement with Mathematics in an Integrated STEM Lesson Evolved over Four Years","authors":"Mollie H. Appelgate, Kari Jurgenson","doi":"10.1080/19477503.2021.2023965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With student-centered, hands-on approaches to real-world problems, integrated STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) curricula have the potential to engage students more authentically in multi-disciplinary learning and to learn mathematics more deeply. However, researchers have shown concern that the “M” is often a silent partner and have called for increasing mathematics’ visibility in STEM curricula. Taking into account this background, this paper investigated how teachers’ and students’ engagement with mathematics within a specific lesson in an integrated STEM unit evolved over four years in two elementary teachers’ classrooms and the factors the teachers pointed to that may explain their adaptations. Using classroom observations and teacher interviews, the results showed that the time engaged with the mathematics and the depth of engagement with the mathematics decreased over the four years. Five themes emerged that may explain their adaptations: 1) limited time, 2) the need to address required school academic standards in limited time, 3) materials and preparation, 4) the teachers’ comfort with the curriculum and, to a lesser extent, 5) their perceptions of their students’ abilities. These findings have implications for those that are writing, studying, or potentially using integrated STEM curricula in elementary schools.","PeriodicalId":36817,"journal":{"name":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","volume":"14 1","pages":"63 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2021.2023965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT With student-centered, hands-on approaches to real-world problems, integrated STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) curricula have the potential to engage students more authentically in multi-disciplinary learning and to learn mathematics more deeply. However, researchers have shown concern that the “M” is often a silent partner and have called for increasing mathematics’ visibility in STEM curricula. Taking into account this background, this paper investigated how teachers’ and students’ engagement with mathematics within a specific lesson in an integrated STEM unit evolved over four years in two elementary teachers’ classrooms and the factors the teachers pointed to that may explain their adaptations. Using classroom observations and teacher interviews, the results showed that the time engaged with the mathematics and the depth of engagement with the mathematics decreased over the four years. Five themes emerged that may explain their adaptations: 1) limited time, 2) the need to address required school academic standards in limited time, 3) materials and preparation, 4) the teachers’ comfort with the curriculum and, to a lesser extent, 5) their perceptions of their students’ abilities. These findings have implications for those that are writing, studying, or potentially using integrated STEM curricula in elementary schools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在四年的综合STEM课程中,学生对数学的参与度是如何变化的
综合STEM(科学、技术、工程、数学)课程以学生为中心,以实践方法解决现实世界的问题,有可能让学生更真实地参与多学科学习,并更深入地学习数学。然而,研究人员担心“M”往往是一个沉默的伙伴,并呼吁提高数学在STEM课程中的可见度。考虑到这一背景,本文调查了在两名小学教师的课堂上,教师和学生在综合STEM单元的特定课程中对数学的参与是如何在四年的时间里演变的,以及教师指出的可能解释他们适应的因素。通过课堂观察和教师访谈,结果表明,在四年中,参与数学的时间和参与数学的深度有所下降。出现了五个主题,可以解释他们的适应:1)有限的时间,2)需要在有限的时间内达到学校要求的学术标准,3)材料和准备,4)教师对课程的舒适度,以及在较小程度上,5)他们对学生能力的看法。这些发现对那些在小学写作、学习或可能使用综合STEM课程的人有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Investigations in Mathematics Learning Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Connections within the Multiplicative Field: A Case Study of Adán’s Mathematical Thinking Investigating the Complexity in Elementary Teachers’ Noticing of Children’s Mathematical Thinking in Written Work Preservice Secondary Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: Focus on Reflective Practice The Role of Units Coordination in Preservice Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Units Construction and Coordination: Past, Present, and Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1